Coming To Grips With Being Down 0-2
You know how when you feel really frustrated, lost, confused, betrayed, and downright depressed you just want to go for a walk in do particular direction and wander around aimlessly till you find some place to sit down and hopefully come to grips with what's happened? Ok, maybe you don't do that, but I do and this is probably going to end up being the literary form of that. So I apologize in advance if this has no clear direction or purpose.
I don't know if I was mentally prepared to be down 2 games to none. I believed that this team would bounce back with a victory in game 2. At worst, I thought, it would have been a close game at the end and perhaps the Heat would have gotten a lucky bounce and won the game. I didn't expect to see the "good guys" get blown out in 2 straight games (and they were blow outs, I don't care what the final score ended up being).
This is the same core group that has been to the Finals twice and has a Banner to their names right? The only thing that can stop them is injuries to Kevin Garnett (obviously 2 years ago, but I would argue that a still-recovering KG was a factor in game 7 last year too). When this team needs to win a game, they do, ...right?
While technically they wouldn't be eliminated with a game 3 loss, this next game is the definition of a "must win" game in the spirit in which that term was created. But wasn't game 2 a very, very, very important game to win? Ok, sure, all playoff games are very, very important. Still, I can't help but feel kind of blindsided by this loss.
All of a sudden we are faced with questions that I simply don't want to and am not prepared to ask. Are the Heat just a better team than us now? Is the season over for us? Who do we pull for after we are out of it? Did Danny make a huge mistake at the deadline (or even in the offseason)? Will Doc stick around? Will there be a lockout? Will Danny blow up the team or "rebuild on the fly" or run it back one more time with another plug-in piece or two? Is The Window closing already? I ...don't ...know, and I don't want to think about any of that. I'm not ready to.
Do I still believe in this team? Umm, I think so. I believe they are very capable of winning the next two at home, taking momentum, and making this a best of 3 series. They are capable of winning the next 4 and showing the world that there's still a championship swagger about this team. I have tons of hope in this team. The problem is that I haven't seen that hope or belief manifest itself on the court yet. I guess that is the definition of faith. Believing in something unseen. I have faith, but I have to admit that it is wavering.
By the way, please, spare me and everyone else the lecture on what it takes to be a "true fan." Every fan deals with stuff like this in their own way. It doesn't make them less of a fan or you more of one. There were many Red Sox fans who, when down 3-0 to the Yankees in '04, stopped believing that they had a shot to come back. If you are honest with yourself (and a Sox fan) you probably felt at least a little doubt. That doesn't mean you were not a fan. It didn't make the victory any less sweet. For those that believed the whole time, did they get a medal or something? Was there a special parade for them that I missed? Give me a break.
I really, really, really hope that the Celtics can rip this Heat team to shreds. I still think that they can. I'm just not sure of it anymore.
Part of me wanted to write a rah-rah, "we can do it" type of piece this morning to cheer everyone up (well, at least the "optimists") but I didn't want to sound fake or disingenuous. (Note: perhaps it is for the best, the only title I could come up with was M.C. Hammer's "Too Legit To Quit." I know, I'm sorry.) On the other hand, I simply cannot count this team out either. There's too much history there. Too much talent. Too much experience. Too much pride.
Several commented yesterday that the torch isn't passed. It is ripped out of the former team's hand. Well you are gonna have to kill this team to take that torch out of its cold, dead hands. Maybe that's just what is going to happen, but not before they strike back and do some damage on the other side. This team may or may not come back and win, but they will fight back. Of that I'm sure. And really, as a fan, that's all I can ask for at this point. The past is past; all we can do is deal with the present and hope for the future.
Go Celtics.
155 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent
Thanks – really sums up my feelings.
As much as I want to believe it can be turned round, the bottom line is that we looked soft and slow in the last 3 Heat games (plus the Bulls whipping as well).
I supported “the trade” but it does seem like too much of a coincidence that the wheels have come off so badly since.
What really scares me is that it wasnt the usual issues (the bench, the lack of a solid center to go with the big four, Rojan havin an off game) which has cost us so far against the Heat, rather it’s been our one, great strength which has gone missing – the big 3.
If we do go out (in say 5 games), I can’t see Danny tinkering – I think it would have to be a reboot.
Great article. Also agree The Big 3 did not show up for the games in Miami ( yes, I know, they did show up, but were simply outplayed by the opponents). I know we’ve got enough weapons to make the series way way way tougher for the Heat. They (Miami) have been playing with nearly no opposition. That has got to change. We can still win the series? I am not sure, maybe. We definitely have enough power and options and alternatives and different game plans to get them in trouble big time. I think the problem is Miami has figured us out. We have to make it difficult for them again, because that’s where they’ll suffer the most. Miami cannot seem to close games out. Let’s Go Celtics!! (Hi from Spain).
I wish you could use "Can´t touch this" as a headline
Being genuine is good, though.
The Truth shall set you free.
Their Big 3 are better than out Big 3
Rondo is supposed to be the difference, but when only 1 of 3 play good in a game, Rondo has to tear it up. He’s played well, but not great.
" Hell yeah I'm trying to gain an advantage out here. If you can't handle it, get off the court."- Kevin Garnett
"Stats are for losers."- Rahim Morris (Tampa Bay Buccaneers)
by KG's Knee on May 5, 2011 8:17 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
It's all set up for Shaq now
Team down 0-2, looking for a sprark to get em’ going coming home. Shaq rides in on his white horse elephant (Shaq ain’t riding no horse) and saves the day. Increasing his LEGEND and in the process writing his own Hollywood ending……….With the Celtics!
" Hell yeah I'm trying to gain an advantage out here. If you can't handle it, get off the court."- Kevin Garnett
"Stats are for losers."- Rahim Morris (Tampa Bay Buccaneers)
Marvelous!
" Hell yeah I'm trying to gain an advantage out here. If you can't handle it, get off the court."- Kevin Garnett
"Stats are for losers."- Rahim Morris (Tampa Bay Buccaneers)
The story lines would be epic...
Years from now we’d have visions of Shaq, running out of the tunnel to start Game 3, putting up a 18/8 in the first half and dominating the lane with reckless abandon. We’ll sit around the fire with our grandkids and say “The year was 2011, the Celtics were down 0-2, the city of Boston thought all was lost, there was no hope. And then… Shaq came.”
…Clearly, this was his plan all along.
Or not, but whatever, it was fun to think about.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I have already come to grips with it. The season has been over for some time. The team lost its confidence after that trade. Who can blame them when the Coach and GM pull the rug from under them. The C’s will go out in 5 and then rebuilding starts.
At least DA gets to drool over the first round pick he earned from his wonderful Green trade.
Get outta here with that stuff.
It has nothing to do with the trade.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I would have to concur
Yes I do agree with the writer, those are the exact feelings I have. As much as I want my Celts to win, it may be out of their hands now. I don’t think any less of my team. It’s just that it seems the hearts are not in the right place at this exact time. But I STILL love my team regardless of what happens in this post season.
Your word or words is the only thing that no one can take from you. Use them wisely.
That trade...
always comes up.
The strange thing is that it’s not Perk the player (although some of his D wouldn’t go a miss) which is hurting us it’s the loss of that togetherness.
To be honest I would rather have JON starting than Perk right now, imo he has been our most consistent starter this post season but I am starting to wonder if even a 25 y.o. Shaq would make a difference when the big 3 look so mentally “gone”.
I have also got my head round it – this isn’t just us getting knocked out, it’s the end of a great (although should have been greater) era.
My only (very small) hope is that PP has not had a full game in this series yet and he can inspire the rest of the team.
A 25 year old Shaq would make a difference.
Duh, there’s nothing to wonder about there.
You’re talking about a guy who dominated the entire league in a way we’ve only seen a handful of times in history. Obviously that would change things.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
read my post properly before replying
by Derekg49 on May 5, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It was a joke bro, chill.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
loss of identity
I agree re: Perk. It’s not that Perk’s skillset is irreplaceable by any means. JO is doing a great job and probably brings more to the table when you are simply looking at his abilities.
However, Boston had a certain swagger and attitude about them for the last 4 years. No one else in the league had it. They were the league’s bully when they wanted to be. They were old school. When healthy, they were the best team in the league when it mattered, and they knew it. That swagger and nasty attitude disappeared when Perk was traded. They don’t play with that same swagger. They don’t play with the same toughness. You can’t underestimate chemistry in team sports, and I think Danny did that here.
Perhaps.
I really can’t argue that’s not true. But we’ll never really know for sure.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
The Trade...
It seems we have traded Lil Nate, Perk, and the belief for Green and Curley
by Celticnation on May 6, 2011 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions
A calculated risk that Danny may have lost.
Danny took a calculated risk by trading Perk. The team was playing about 700 ball before Shaq got hurt. He bet that Shaq would reemerge and was therefore willing to trade Perk to get Green and a first rounder. It made sense because the team needed another small forward and he could also start the rebuilding process with Green and a first round pick. A reasonable theory. Because Shaq hasn’t played, he may have lost the bet for this year and maybe beyond. I also believe that although Perk has intangibles, they were not a factor in the win/lost column while Shaq was on the court
Right on Schedule for the Playoffs
Get back to the present Celtic fans. We have lost 2 road games. Granted we didn’t play our best. But Miami probably did play it’s best down the stretch in Game 2.
So, if the Big Four raise their shotmaking percentage and everybody plays defense with no turnovers down the stretch for two games we are dead even in the series. And we all know it’s up for grabs again!
Our bench won their minutes in game 2 so it’s up to the big 4 to raise their level of play.
I agree that Jermaine was the most consistent player in game 2 and probably should have been in the game down the stretch with the lack of offense Big Baby is producing.
That's true...
The two games were Miami at their best. The Celtics took their blows even when they were wounded and tried clawing back. Hopefully, after three days of recuperating, the Celtics will be the one delivering the pain.
by bfrombleacher on May 5, 2011 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions
What is right on schedule?
This core group of players has never been down 2-0 in a playoff series
I have to be totally honest
when the Big Three was put together, I figured there was a 3 year window, now into year 4.
Danny Boy is going to have a lot of work to do a couple years down the road,
if not sooner.
Prove we are wrong, Tom "Medicine Man" Quinn, NOT!
But that 4th year window opened wide and let a lot of sunshine in until the (gulp) trade.
If we do not win it this year, the players and we the fans are all going to wonder what could have been had not DA made the deals even though we were the top seed in the East at the time and the players just got Brother Perk back. Dude worked hard to get back and he wanted badly to get back to the Finals. Played with a lot of heart. Perhaps he will get his chance in a blue jersey….ugh.
by JPV on May 5, 2011 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions
It's a nice sentiment and all.
I cried a little.
But it has nothing to do with this team right now, and is not the reason they lost two games… on the road… against a really, really good team.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I do not mean to debate this much since there will be plenty of time for this later.
I cannot agree that the 2 losses had NOTHING to do with the trade. That is a pretty blanket statement. I think the trade is in the mix with the poor play down the stretch of these two games. Perk was a brother and fellow warrior. Played well in the defensive system alongside with KG. Knew the rotations. Played with the same 4 other players since the Big 3 came on the scene. Best friends with Rondo. Played with a lot of heart and hated his opponent while on the court. He was not a 10/10 guy every night but he was not Mikki Moore either. Stuff he contributed on the court and in the locker room is hard to measure. Sorry if I have a soft spot for the guy but he was the epitome of a Celtic. A throwback to the Cowens era. And only 26 years old. Can never convince me the trade did not mess with these guys.
That's fine, and you're entitled to you're opinion.
But please understand, none of what you just argued can be proven. You’re basically talking about the “psychology of sports” aspect of a trade. It’s speculative, at best, we simply cannot know if there’s any truth to it.
We can however point to stats, stats that say Perk isn’t nearly the player post injury as he was before, stats that say both his rebounding and shot blocking is down considerably. Stats the show he is getting torched in the post by Nene and Z-Bo this year, stats that say OKC has been a better team with him OFF the floor so far. These are all things we can see, all things we can quantify.
You might be right, maybe it did mess with their heads, maybe it does have something to do with their play. Then again, maybe they just lost two games on the road to a good team, and that’s it. Maybe, when they come home, they’ll got those calls they weren’t getting, the shots will fall a bit easier with that home cooking, and this series with be 2-2 and going back to Miami. So, if that happens, what then? The trade is a scape goat when they lose, and not even a thought when they win.
Let it go.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Please do not tell me to let it go.
Stats do not tell the whole picture. If you want evidence, go back and watch the Association and see the players’s faces and hear the comments after the trade. Go back and read some of the comments of the opposing players in talking about how the Celtics are softer up the middle. Look at his contributions to THE CELTICS over the past few years. Perhaps he is getting torched in OKC but he is not playing with KG on defense and with the same starters he played with for several years. That could explain some of the OKC “stats”. And what stat do you use to measure one’s heart and grit?
I will feel the same way about the trade if we win it all. If we do, then I will applaud the Celtics for overcoming all the changes and pay tribute to their mental toughness. And I will also wish that Perk was a part of it.
So you basically just said Perk was good because we played with KG?
And in that context, JO is just as good then filling that spot, since clearly it’s only KG that makes the defense great.
You said it, not me.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
That is exactly right. Perk was valuable to us because he played along KG
and in our system as a whole. The sum of those 5 parts were better than any one part. We are about to find out how good he is playing outside that system. I do not think we can judge that yet with the number of games he has played for them so far.
As for JO, he is thankfully playing well and filling the spot well. Does this mean that the players do not miss playing with Perk? No. And how good would we be right now with Perk starting and JO coming off the bench, or vice versa? (assuming no Shaq).
We'll never know really, which is kind of my point.
It’s impossible to say how the team would have done with Perk here right now. I personally don’t think it would have made a difference. Hell, Jeff Green kept us in that game in the first half, if the trade didn’t happen, maybe that game wasn’t even close.
I honestly have no idea, nobody does really. That’s my entire point, neither side can answer that question, so either side saying “We’re losing because of the trade” or, if they start winning “We’re winning because of the trade” is just completely pointless. It’s all speculation and biased opinions.
Which is exactly my point from the beginning, we’ll never answer this question, so you got to let it go.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
So by your reasoning, you should also let your opinion go?
Since we can prove either side, as you indicate, then you should let it go that Perk would not have made a difference? If we let our opinions go, then we might as well shut down the blog! That is what this blog is for.
Oh, and Jeff Green did not play that well in the second half.
If the trade does not happen, maybe the second half goes better? My point about the trade is the big picture and not using it to analyze a several minute stretch of a game.
You're not getting it though.
There is no bigger picture, we can’t answer the question. Nobody can go back in time, nobody can enter an alternate dimension where Perk wasn’t traded, and see exactly how this team would be playing right now.
We don’t know, we never will. So let’s do all of us a favor and stop talking about it. Talk about this team as it is right now, because this is the team we have, nothing will change it. If you don’t like it, that’s fine you have no obligation to be here.
But endless talks about “trade this, trade that, Danny sucks, we miss Perk… blah blah, freaking blah” will go on forever and accomplish nothing. It’s time to move on, this is our team, love it or leave it.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I was trying to be civil and respect your opinion.
But you continue to condescend. I enjoy being on here and sharing my love of the Celtics and opinions on here with everyone. There are many great fans on this site and we sometime disagree but we all care about the team. Unless Jeff,, Po or the other moderators tell me to leave, I will continue to post my thoughts. Feel free to debate, as we have been doing thus far, but do not tell me to do you a favor and stop talking about it. Or that I do not have to be here. If you do not like what I write, do not read it and move on.
I was figurative JPV, I really didn't mean that to say I want you to leave.
Please don’t take it that way.
My point was there’s just no other option right now, this is the team we have, so going on endlessly talking about things we cannot change just won’t accomplish anything.
It’s an exercise in futility, so all of us are left with one choice “Love it, or leave it.” If you love the Celtics, as you clearly do since you obviously have shown passion for it just in being here and having this debate, we have no choice but you support this team as it is now. I’m sorry, but in my opinion, we just can’t do that if we continually live in the past.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Yes, but I wasn't the one who brought it up.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
LOL. Ok Sizzlack. I think we have beaten this dead horse.
But it seems like we agree on the most important thing and that is the Celtics are far from dead. I agree with you that Miami has yet to face adversity in the playoffs. Up 3-0 in the first round and 2-0 in the second round. Let’s see if they eat their young after the Celtics even this out. I hope by late Monday night all of us are posting on here how psyched we are to go back to Miami 2-2 and watch the Heat implode.
Here here.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Great article again Jeff, although this is one of your more melancholy pieces.
You have captured the angst that many of us are feeling right now. What I found interesting is the contrast in how the Lakers and Celtics are handling, at least in public, being down 0-2. Bryant has said the Mavs can beat the Lakers and Jackson has admitted they are very concerned. Bynum is complaining about trust. They sound defeated. The Celtics have a different reaction. Allen said they are not afraid and have the opportunity to come out shining. Garnett states that they have to go home and get two. Davis said it is do or die. But nobody has stated that they think the Heat can beat them in a series. And I think they are not saying it because they do not believe it. Good because playing with confidence at home can turn this around. My only concern, mentally, is Rondo. Hope he has shaken whatever attitude he has after Game 2.
But there is a difference
LA lost two home games, the heat won two home games (which is par).
Glad to see some smart fans
I love the C’s just like anyone else but I’m at least realistic in my thoughts. This team has really been done for sometime. They have no heart, no passion, no intensity, and no desire. We always say, “Wait till next game.” Pretty soon there is no next game. As much as Danny is no good Doc Rivers is just as bad. His rotation scheme is the WORST in the league. My 3 hopes for this team is: we win the next 2 games, BBD hopefully will be gone next year, and WANT Doc gone right after this season. I want to win these games but I’m realistic that they probably wont. Oh yeah, either Shaq is really soft or Doc is full of crap.
Don't like the "smart fans" comment
Do agree the C’s are running out of time though, and quite skeptical myself. Haven’t given up hope though.
Doc does need to switch up his rotation. Garnett needs to come out earlier in the 1st quarter so he can play C to start the 2nd qtr. with Green at PF. Baby can play PF(not C), and might even break out of his funk playing next to JO and our starting backcourt. Shaq should start immediately to see what he can give (even if for only 4 mins.), then play JO last 8 min of qtr..
" Hell yeah I'm trying to gain an advantage out here. If you can't handle it, get off the court."- Kevin Garnett
"Stats are for losers."- Rahim Morris (Tampa Bay Buccaneers)
So not being a "realist" makes you dumb?
How about some reality for you?
Championship contenders for SUPPOSE TO WIN THE GAMES AT HOME.
People need to wake up on this, the series is not over, all the Celtics have done is lose two games on the road to a very good team that wans’t suppose to lose them. Does it put more pressure on them? Of course. Doesn’t mean they wont come through.
A road team in the playoffs in a tough series like this comes in with one goal, protect your home court, push game 7, and then anything can happen. If you manage to steal one of the earlier games great, but if you don’t, it doesn’t change anything.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
My heart tells me the Celtics will win in 7 but
my head tells me that we split in Boston, win a tough game 5 in Miami and lose close game at home in Game 6.
I concur
with losing in 6 games, not sure in what order.
Prove we are wrong, Tom "Medicine Man" Quinn, NOT!
Nice article, Jeff.
I wish I could shake this black, cynical feeling that has come over me after watching these first two games.
I’ve watched a ton of NBA basketball over the years. And seen a ton of really, really bad officiating. These last two games have kinda put me over the edge with completely understanding just how much the games are at the mercy and whim of the officials.
I don’t know if they are corrupt or incompetent. I just know I can’t trust it to be fair and competent. And that just taints everything.
Even if we win these next two – is that a sign that the Celtics have the ability to come back and win the series? Or is that just the officials extending the series for $$ reasons?
I think I can actually say that right now I am more depressed about what this says about the state of a sport I enjoy – the NBA in general – than I am about the Celtics’ situation in particular.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
by mmmmm on May 5, 2011 9:29 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
It is sad to see fans putting this on the officials
Celts got outplayed in two games. (I know, you are going to fill me up with reams of stats from the deepest darkest depths of your computer to prove me wrong).
if it makes you so sad
just ignore it. You seem to ignore the fact that I am clearly talking about a larger issue than these two games, so that shouldn’t be a problem. And you won’t be sad.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Again, I agree. We need to hear some noise from Doc or Danny
If you look at it from a strategic standpoint Doc or better yet, Danny needs to be complaining & getting fined. There needs to be as much publicity & press as possible. Then, you’ve got the league & the refs both, at the very least, thinking about what perception is being generated. They “say” they want to be ‘fair’ , but when you release the hounds (the press) you increase the pressure to be perceived as fair……..that’s when teams start to MYSTERIOUSLY get a similar # of foul shots…….a better chance at a level playing field.
I’ve watched basketball a long time too, & I’ve seen Sportscenter etc work wonders. Espn loves the controversy / ratings & will play clips & stir the pot. Phil is a master at public proclamations of ref bias. You also saw HUGE press recently over how many losses Crawford was a part of when it came to Mavs playoff games 2-16 record. That was brilliant. The Mavs won that game 101-89……….the Mavs got ********26****** free throws……the Blazers got *******27******* free throws…………………Isn’t that ……………INTERESTING………………….
Time for Danny to do make some noise in the press
It is also sad to see fans who think the refs had no effect whatsoever on the game
The Cs played poorly, but some of the perceived poor play is due to getting hacked with no call REPEATEDLY. Also, it is flat out wrong to call ticky tacky fouls on one side of the floor while the other side gets away with barnyard ball.
Probably true.
Let’s hold out some hope against hope that those things will even out when the series switches to Boston though.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I have very high hopes that they will, indeed, 'even out'.
But that won’t really appease my cynical gloom. If we end up winning due to a similar load of ticky-tack crap, it will just validate it.
The game should not have the calls swaying so extremely for or against any team, even ours.
It just leaves a bad taste, win or lose.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Yep. No argument here.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I here you and you were also good enough in a prior post to point out stats that Lebron has never fouled out of a game this year.
And has maybe come close a few times. So, does anyone think the refs are going to foul him out now.
My issue with the refs was with Game 7 last year. The 4th quarter was a travesty.
Good points
My favorite nba games are when you don’t notice the refs—-when you can’t even remember who ref’d the game.
It seems like a divine blessing when each team gets to the stripe about the same number of times. Imagine, the players actually deciding the game amongst themselves with minimal 3rd party intervention.
Calling it the same both ways is such a beautiful sight. To feel the sense of fair play is a unique joy on the verge of extinction. To bad we can’t reward those refs with extra money & more games. Instead, we have the old boy network with all its infamous glory.
Some cause for optimism is if Shaq plays.
I know. I know. This has become a joke around here, like “Waiting for Godot”. But really. If he can give us 20 minutes and allow us to rotate him and JO at center, we have a good chance to get the series even. And it keeps Baby away from the 5 spot. Who guards Shaq down low? Big Z? Anthony at 6’ 9" , Dampier? And we all know what happens when the defense collapses on Shaq. Either a foul or a kick out to a shooter. And if we win 2 in Boston with Shaq playing effectively with JO, it will mess with the Heat going back to game 5. For this reason alone, I am optimistic.
Here's what really bothers me
All the head hanging from the Celtics. What is that?
We use to get mad, push people around, impose our will, turn up the D, make some big shots, and turn the game/series around.
Now… we hang our heads. KG hangs his head on the bench?? It’s embarrassing and humiliating and unacceptable!!!
Celtics? Who’s mad, pissed, ready to kill somebody over this? Where is the Celtic Heart? We saw it in Game 7’s in 2008 and in the finals. We saw it when KG went down and we beat the Bulls in 7 and took the Magic to 7 games. We saw it last year when we made Lamebron quit, crushed the Magic, and beat the Lakers in the finals (except for that rigged 4th quarter) btw Stern I will NEVER forgive you for that debacle.
This head hanging crap has got to stop. Go punch somebody like Parrish did to big bad Bill Bill Laimbeer. Go closeline somebody like McHale did to Rambus. Somebody step up and call out this team like Bird did against the Lakers in the finals…… You guys are playing like a bunch of sissies….soft… there I said it!
But head hanging… I can’t take that…. WE SHALL NOT GO QUIETLY INTO THE NIGHT! We have a legacy to live up too. Live up to it PP, RA, KG, RR, BBD, JO, SO, DW, JG, NK and you too Doc!
This is about HEART! No more head hanging accepted – time for some BUTT KICKING. We’re winning this or going out in a blaze of glory!
But I’m turning OFF the games if I see another Celtic head hang………
Celtic Chat Handle: Bird
by David Henderson on May 5, 2011 10:08 AM EDT reply actions
Rage, rage against the dieing of the light!
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
YES! Wake up, Man up, and Kick some heat butt
Celtics win as a team! Someone on the team—Paul Pierce—are you listening?—needs to do just what you said—call the team out, fire them up, and then make it happen on the court. I believe that if every player from AB to PP decide they aren’t losing—then they will win. Yes, the heat have come together, and yes lebron and dwade are remarkable players, but the Celtics have one more run to the title in them. Suck it up and let’s do it. You eat an elephant one bite at a time—so start working on that elephant come Saturday! Go, Go, Go! As Bill Russell once said, “Go Up For Glory!”
by bigislandbob on May 5, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
You really have 0 respect for the big 3 then huh?
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Unless LBJ or Wade suffers a broken leg....this series is over!
Forget James, he`s indestructible….and Wade isn`t much different.
Miami has two Hall of Fame players in their prime….they have gone 21-4 since March 8th…they are 3-0 vs. Boston since the Perkins trade….they smell the blood in the water.
Boston`s one shot was in Game 2, when the score was 80-80 mid-way through the 4th quarter. It was then they let the Heat get away from them…along with the series.
Talk to me in a week.
And I want you to save this post somewhere, put it up on your wall. Then crumple it up and eat it with the Celtics even the series.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
I hope you are right
I have my doubts, but have not given up hope yet either. Boston stayed with this team
for most of the game and Pierce was not 100%. If Person’s achilles sprain, gets worse,
than Boston will be finished. The achilles usually does not heal quickly.
We are at home and will be playing better. Shaq may be making a return.
DWest and Green are playing better. So there are a few positives.
Wade and James may just be too much though. Those guys are looking tough.
Pierce's achilles sprain
Don’t know how I came up with Person’s. Chuck Person brought up from the
subconcious. Maybe I was daydreaming about how the 80s Celtics would have
kicked this Miami team’s butt. McHale would have had a field day against this team.
I`m not happy about it either...but, that`s the reality of the situation
Without some crazy intervening event, Miami is NOT going to suddenly lose 4-out-of-5 to an aging and depleted Celtic team.
In addition, the Heat know better than anyone how much they are hated. Wisely, they feed off that, and use it to motivate themselves. To blow a 2-0 lead would bring them unbearable criticism.
They`re not going to allow it to happen.
Ya, and Miami also ran off what... 14 straight at one point?
And then the entire NBA crowned them inevitable champions, and they turned around and dropped 6 straight games.
I don’t know the numbers, and I don’t care to look it up, but it was along that context.
Miami is a team that is great when they are winning and everything is going their way. Once things turn bad, they turn bad quick, this team has not yet responded to adversity, not once, this entire season. Every time trouble comes, it’s literally taken them weeks to turn it around. You don’t have that kind of time in the playoffs.
Maybe it wont happen, maybe they’ll keep playing great and the Celtics just wont be good enough to put them to that test. It’s possible, I won’t argue that. But here’s my point, don’t put it past this Miami to team to cave at the first sign of trouble. And don’t count Boston out because of two games, unlike Miami, they’ve been through this circus before.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Only Wade has a ring on that team. Until they win it all together, I respectfully disagree with you.
LeBron has choked several times in the playoffs and this is new territory for Bosh. If the Celtics get 2 in Boston, how will those guys handle the pressure? Will they snipe at each other? Will players like Chalmers and Anthony shrink from the pressure? Will Game 5 feel like a Game 7 for them? Win these 2 and all the pressure goes back on Miami.
Superman was indestructible. James has proven several times he is mortal.
The torch being passed theme
is shining even lighter now with the Lakers 0-2 situation, but at least Boston is HOME for the next two, so there is still hope.
3-4 yes, 5 no.
Every home game from here out is a “must win.”
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Yes. That too.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
as I said yesterday it takes one play and one game to turn this around
yeah, it looks bleak right now. we’re old, we’re beat up, we’re fatigued, the heat have the 2 best players, etc, etc. But if we win game 3 then who knows? We need to turn this around one quarter at a time. If we stay in the moment and focus on our D and O we have enough horses to win this thing but we need to start playing as a team right now. I think Baby SHOULD attack the rim. we need to get inside on these guys. But he has to do it in the flow of the game and not kill ball movement. He also can’t start his bull rushes 20 feet from the basket. KG needs to find some inner reserve and assert himself. If he gets tired then DOc has to trust in the bench. we don’t need hero ball- we need guys playing together. Pierce has to step up. He has been MIA for 2 games and we need our best player to play like our best player.And Rondo has to pick up where he left off in the 4th qtr when he finally started to look like the guy who beat the knicks. All of these things are doable. Will they happen? I don’t know.
Let's see how the Celtics play in Boston before giving up
Give this team a chance to come back. They are champions after all.
They deserve that respect.
I only want to know one thing
How can anyone definitively say that what has happened to the Celtics has nothing to do with the trade? It’s that simple. Tell me how you know that for sure.
You first.
Tell me how you know it does.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Here is what I have said all along
I am saying in my opinion this team lost a lot of its heart, soul and toughness when Perk walked out the door. I have also said that the two players Danny got in the trade have basically done nothing for this team. They have neither won, nor lost a game for the Celtics. They are just here. I have also said that Danny talked a lot about how important Shaq would be after he made the trade and that he was confident that Shaq was going to be healthy. I actually agree that Shaq would be a big help, but guess what, Danny blew it. He was depending on a guy who still can’t run more than three months after he was injured.
And here is one more effect of the trade. Maybe Rondo played better when Perk was here because Perk was the only guy he listened to. Maybe Perk would give Rondo a little slap upside the head when he started pulling one of his spoiled brat acts. I have no proof, just a theory.
Bottom line — I cannot say fo sure that the trade is why they are where they are right now. However, I feel confident saying the trade brought two players here who have been less than effective and removed a great deal of toughness and leadership from the team, and combined with the injury to Shaq, has left this team a shell of itself.
"trade brought two players here who have been less than effective"
This we can agree on, Green has not worked out as hoped, and Krstic was never apart of long term plans. Obviously Danny expected to have the Shaq-JO-Baby rotation for his Center position.
This hasn’t worked out, it was a calculated gamble from the start, and assuming it’s too late that this point even if Shaq does come back, obviously he lost that gamble. I’m not arguing that point.
But to make the argument that this team is only losing because of that trade, that the rest of the players are a shell of themselves because Perk is going, as if if the trade didn’t happen, they’d have suddenly rolled over Miami int he first two games without question… no, you can’t make that argument.
I agree with your points, things have not worked out as Danny expected them too, but to put the entirety of the blame on the trade is, in my opinion, just not fair.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Keeping Perk was also a calculated risk.
He was just coming back from injury and who knows what could have happened. Jermaine was more of an expected level of risk for his surgery recovery. Shaq’s injury was just plain unexpected, much like KG’s a couple years ago.
And I think Green has done better as a backup than any of the buyout options to choose from at that time.
"I don’t think in the past. I don’t think in the future. You grasp the moment." -KG
And having no backup to Pierce
Would also have been a calculated risk. One can argue that there were other alternatives to what Danny did, but once Quis went down, standing pat was just not an option. However little one thinks of Green’s play, he has provided minutes off the bench that would have not been there if they kept Perk and did nothing.
does it really matter anymore?
The trade happened. Endlessly fretting over it is not going to change anything.
Time to move on and hope for the best. And once again, the
series ain’t over yet. It may be soon. But IT AIN’T OVER YET!
If they lose in this round, Mr. Ainge deserves a great deal of the blame
The trade is a big part of this season. It won’t go away.
Mr. Ainge
Ainge pulled off the trades that brought in the Big Three in the first place.
Mr. Ainge is a big reason why the Celtics won their first championship
since 1986. That was one long drought. And I am grateful for 2008 and
the past few years.
Not to mention that if not for injuries there probably would have
been three championships at this point. Where is the gratitude?
He gambled. He may have lost. We don’t know that quite yet do we?
by McCracker on May 5, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
As of right now, he's definitely lost.
I won’t argue against that. But I don’t blame him for it, even in hindsight I’d of done that trade again.
Green just hasn’t turned out to be the player we thought he’d be. I argued up and down that he played out of position in OKC, he’s a natural 3 and he’d be much better with more minutes there. I still believe that, and I still believe he has the talent to be very good some day.
But to be fair, if we look at the trade, Danny traded Perk based primarily on the gamble of two major points:
1. Shaq would be healthy and the C position would be fine with a Shaq-JO-Baby rotation
2. Green would be better playing as a 3 and be able to provide consistent bench scoring and reliable minutes defending larger wing players while giving Paul rest.
Neither of those two points have worked out, so Danny lost that gamble, there’s no questioning it. But I still don’t fault him for doing it, he had to take that chance. When Marquis went down, you had to get Paul a back up, you think Green has been bad this series… imagine if it was Von Wafer guarding him 20 minutes a game?
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
2. Green would be better playing as a 3
THIS has worked out.
Green’s numbers while playing at the SF spot for us have been fantastic. Not quite as good as Pierce’s, but still very, very good.
The problem is, we still keep playing him a huge chunk of time at the PF – often in configurations with BBD at C.
But even with others at C (JO, Krstic, KG), Green overall has been pretty lame at PF. This is very clear and compelling in his positional split data.
I am bewildered as to why we keep playing Green at PF. It made sense when injuries forced us to use more of BBD’s time at C. But that then gets to a much, much bigger question: Why do we keep putting BBD at C?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
by mmmmm on May 5, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
And he will, gladly.
But he’d do it again in a heart beat. Ainge has proven he’s not afraid to take those risks, and put it all on the line. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. But that’s what you do, teams don’t win Championships by “playing it safe.”
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
No need to give up.
Even if we lose game 3, there’s still the chance to pull out the series and not even by “a miracle”… all it takes is the refs/League that wants to get this product to reach a game 7 and then either some above average RayRay, some balls bouncing our way, or an inadvertent injury to LeBron or DWade. Some team is going to pull out 4 in a row so why not it be the Celtics to add to their lore?
But we’re not at that point yet and several things are in our favor… some rest for nagging injuries, home court fans, a bit of anger as an edge, and a good old case of Shaq-Attack. Rondo/Green have not been a fast break machine so we may as well switch back to Rondo/Shaq that worked well at the start of the season. Shaq being on the floor spreads the others out and makes room for Rondo to drive and either score or dish to an open man.
If nothing else, Shaq can give us 6 solid fouls. And I hope they are solid fouls where someone lands on their ass. Maybe Doc should design a play for Shaq to get the ball on the run and Diesel over LeBron as payback. That’d be worth a foul. But seriously, Shaq’s minutes also help by keeping Kristic on the bench, keeping Baby from playing center, and giving Jermaine some rest so he can come back in strong.
"I don’t think in the past. I don’t think in the future. You grasp the moment." -KG
things that need to happen:
- shaq needs to return
- BBD needs to play fewer minutes and restrict his shots (or have them restricted)
- DW needs to play more. He can create his own shots.
-JG needs some of BBD’s minutes
- Guard the paint better.
What I think is killing the C’s is the Heat’s backdoor passing in the paint. The Heat are getting too many easy, demoralizing pick and roll/baseline cut shots in the paint. Whoever is guarding the paint needs to guard it more. Less double teaming on the perimeter. Let them kill us with 3’s. I can live with that.
Ainge "accidentally" blew up the team in Feb.
He didn`t mean to kill the team….just like Princess Di`s chauffeur didn`t mean to kill her.
But, it did happen….That`s life.
1} Like many others, he vastly overestimated Jeff Green.
2} The trade stripped the Celtics of their identity and chemistry. Now, they are just a collection of players.
1) Probably true, at least for this year.
2) Biased opinion. No way to prove that.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
If you ask some of the opposing players, I think they would say that the Celtics have lost their identity.
Some have already said it. For me, such statements take this out of the realm of speculation.
Which is why I wouldn't ask them.
No one knows anything about that team other than the guys who are in that locker room, and they’re not going to come out and say it.
So again, we’ll just never know.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Man it's sad to see our team look so old and humbled
by Miami. I don’t know if the trade never happened if there would be much difference. What can you say when the big 3 +1 play like mice – not men (my apologies to Ray). Where’s the heart, the toughness, I mean, it looks like they’ve forgotten how to run even the most basic plays.
On the plus side, LA’s not going anywhere, and like Bynum said “there’s trust issues.” Could that apply to the Celtics as well?
I think so with the trust issues.
The problem with both teams are that they are actually good and could probably beat their respective teams, but the heart is not there to me. I don’t see any urgency and what surprises me is that I haven’t seen any from KG. I mean when the playoffs started I wanted the chest pumping screaming and cursing KG. I wanted the KG that talked to himself with the spit hanging out of his mouth(disgusting I know) and I also wanted the slobber big baby heck rondo doesn’t even seem in the zone and I can see it in his eyes he may need the headband back or something, but man I just feel spoiled by last years playoffs.
Both teams along with the spurs have fallen bad and right now the Lakers seem in a deeper hole because they lost at home and now have to go to Dallas with a hostile crowd and no Ron for game 3 because of suspension.
by JoT on May 5, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I included the trust quote because there is something
cleary wrong with the way the team is playing. It’s not all “miami is so much better.” It’s more than that, and their heart seems to be missing.
That's where I agree with you
Miami is good yes, but Boston to me is not slumping because of Miami I really think they have something wrong within the team that is not being put out there. I don’t think they truly trust each other and are comfortable with each other which is why a team may look great on paper, but without chemistry there is nothing there. This team lost it’s trust and true chemistry amongst one another and I hope these two losses along with Shaq coming back can propel this team. I don’t even think the new additions have been properly accepted and joined into the team and even though I hate to say it I believe that has to do with the trade. I have a feeling Jeff has been playing subpar because he’s not happy here and has not been welcomed here by the team to feel comfortable and you can see the contrast in Oklahoma with Perk while not putting up great numbers was welcomed with open arms there.
This team looks lost and disinterested right now especially with the shocking play of Paul and KG and even Rondo.
by JoT on May 5, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Are the Heat just a better team than us now?
No, but they’re playing better at the moment. The did what they had to do which is protect their HC before heading to Boston. We’ve seen this so many times in sports. We can all make the argument that the Celtics have played poorly in both games 1 and 2, and the refs didn’t help either. So here we are in rough position, but it’s no over until the road team wins.
The Celtics dug a grave, and now they have to figure out whether to jump in or cover it up with dirt and fight on.
If 'The Trade' is really responsible for the sub-par play of the Big 4 - then they don't deserve to be champions.
Seriously – this topic is getting ridiculous.
From a mechanical standpoint, Perk’s physical absence had nothing to do with how poorly the Big 3 shot from the field the last 2 games. And our defensive numbers are not the problem. Despite claims of us being ‘soft’ in the post, the fact is that the Heat only came in to the rim 16 times in Game 2 (compared to our shooting at their rim 27 times). Our problems in these two games have almost entirely been to touch fouls away from the basket on pass-out recoveries from over-aggressive doubles. Almost the entire sum of the point disparity is accounted for by the latter alone.
So if “The Trade” is the cause of any of our woes then it is mental. And if that is true – complete and utter speculation by fan-psychologists, mind you – then frankly our core players are mental weaklings and don’t deserve to win the title anyway.
I personally do not believe that Ray, Paul & KG are mental weaklings. Call me crazy, but I see too much history behind all those guys to believe that. So that is why I don’t believe “The Trade” has anything to do with things at this point. I could be wrong. But this belief makes more sense to me.
I think our current situation is due to a conflux of several other more direct factors that have nothing to do with the trade.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
by mmmmm on May 5, 2011 12:58 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
If we do not win number 18 this season, then I predict that, one by one, over the course of time,
we will hear from these players and coaching staff, and they will say that the loss of chemistry and Perk affected them (they already have said it but, hey, let’s ignore that…..). Only then will this debate truly be settled.
by JPV on May 5, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions
or they will say that "No, we can't use that as an excuse. It was on us and we just didn't do what we needed to."
and will you believe them?
People say a lot of things in public that may or may not be true – whether or not they believe them. People don’t always know rationally, coldly, what is actually driving them.
So no, that probably won’t settle it.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
So you simply never believe anything anyone tells you?
by JPV on May 5, 2011 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn't say that.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
And I think what Vinnie and others, including myself, is saying is that the trade is/was a factor,
Nobody is stating that it is the only reason. That would be short-sighted. But it cannot be discounted completely, like some bloggers seem to suggest. Obviously there are several reasons for the current state but the trade is one of the elephants in the room.
by JPV on May 5, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
if it is a factor - then please explain it in a way that makes sense
Do you really think that Ray, Paul, KG & Rondo are that mentally immature that they would let it affect their play to this level?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Scroll above to my exchanges with Sizzlack if you care to know the basis for my opinion.
I am not retyping all of it again here but you equate mental immaturity with chemistry issues. I do not think they are the same thing.
by JPV on May 5, 2011 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I did read it - and you don't really answer the question explicitly
other than to assert that the trade is a big factor.
Which simply begs the question. Why, exactly, is it a big factor? How, exactly did it come into play in these last two games? Was it not a factor in the prior series against NY?
Couldn’t these last two games just be a case of the Big 4 having a bad couple of games (combined with some unfortunately skewed officiating)?
Every loss since the trade has seemed to become this larger, referendum on The Trade. Wins just happen. Odd that.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
It is a factor m5, there's no question.
But so is literally everything else.
The problem comes when people at it at THE reason, and not A factor in what is going on right now.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
*people "look at it as"
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Do you think that Kendrick Perkins had any impact on keeping Rajon Rondo in line?
I have no proof of this, but my theory is starting to make sense to me (of course). Rondo comes off as a petulant child at times. Maybe it was his buddy perk who would whack him upside the head and get him back on track. Seems to me that Rondo had far fewer “don’t care” games when Perk was here. I would like to see your definitive proof that this trade has had no impact on the performance of this team.
'Can't prove a negative.
You are trying to flip the assertion in order to avoid the burden of proof.
The assertion has been pretty clearly made by you that the trade is the source of much if not all of the Celtic’s problems. Although proof of that assertion would be nice, I would be satisfied with just a description of the mechanism by which your assertion plays out.
This latest post here by you is a step in that direction – but it includes another assertion, of course, about Rondo’s mental makeup. That seems to step into the realm of speculation and pure opinion on Rondo’s maturity. Do you really think he is that immature?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Again, watch The Association and tell me those guys were not affected.
I did list my reasons in my exchange with SIzzlack. I reeled off about 5 or 6 of them mmmmmm. You must have missed it. I certainly think a combo of Perk and JO would be devasting for opponents right now. But perhaps the point is moot since Shaq is back tomorrow night. Hopefully he som gas left in the diesel tank.
by JPV on May 6, 2011 8:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Honestly though, no one is saying it doesn't have an effect.
I don’t know where you come on with this stuff man. I’ve never once heard anyone in support of the trade say “Naw, it doesn’t bother them at all.” But you continually take it to the extreme, and rather than look at it as A factor that clearly has effected them, you argue it as the one and only reason they lost two games.
Dealing in absolutes is absolutely foolish. I do not doubt the trade affected the team, you could see that in the videos, they talked about it like losing a brother, clearly that has it’s impact. But to say that is the only reason, like they simply cannot win without him, that 3 hall of fame players and an All star point guard were only good for the last 3 seasons because they had their big buddy Perk with them and felt all warm and fuzzy, it’s just insane. It basically gives no respect to the mental toughness of those players, and I just simply cannot make that jump.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
04 + 07 = 11
Your definitive statements about this topic are amazing
The trade has nothing to do with anything is your conclusion. Just amazing.
When a statement is qualified with "I believe"
then it is by no means definitive at all. I make it very clear in my text where the boundaries lie between facts and my opinions.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I really, really, really hope that the Celtics can rip this Heat team to shreds. I still think that they can. I'm just not sure of it anymore.
I hear u Jeff Clark. I see it like this. If the Celtics want it bad then they need to go get it. It’s that simple! What I’ve saw in games 1 and 2; is no fight, urgency or the want to compete. The Celtics seem lost, delusional and caught by surprise by the way the Heat are challenging them.
Come Saturday night those Boston fans at TD Garden better go insane like it’s game 7 do or die. lol
What I see.........
is the that the Celtics have no answer for the quickness of LeBron and Wade.
You can have all the fight in the world and still not be able to stop the first
step of either James or Wade. They are talented and younger.
We have all seen it before with the Celtics overtaking the older 76ers, the Pistons
overtaking the Celtics, the Bulls overtaking the Lakers and Pistons.
Still, a team effort can overcome better talent. Not sure we have the talent to compete.
Sadly, we are hoping that a 39 year old former MVP can regain a little of his old magic
and bring back the lost chemistry to this team. Wishful thinking most likely.
Jeff, your wandering analogy...
is literally what I did after Game 7 last year. Just walking with my thoughts as my only companion, without a single destination. Sad times.
I will always believe in this team, I love this group, though I do miss Perk. Celts in 6.
by green18, 19, 20... on May 5, 2011 1:20 PM EDT reply actions
I just don't want a sweep
Doesn’t look like we can beat them, sad but true.
Celtics' turn on switch for the playoffs: the last bastion of hope for battered Celtic fans.
I dont think its the trade or lack of anything sure refs are giving the Heat points. But if you are going to be a champion there can be no excuses
Every shot the Heat make in a game seems to really be a punch in the gut to our core. Everything the Heat have done has been in preperation for this series. Ask Carlos Arroyo.
I know it dosent sound right, it dosent feel right to say.But, our team defense is working against us. Our help defense isnt helping, their is really no point in helping against Wade or Lebron. They will either make the basket, or get touched with a finger tip and get the foul. The numbers show that most of the Heats points arent coming in the paint, they are from 10 foot out or beyond. I really think that they are using our help defense against us. Every option for Miami is open during games and its our fault for coming to early to help. I hope I’m wrong but this is what i saw in the last three meetings against the Heat. Lebron needs to be forced into hero mode, I dont care what anyone says KG should guard him ( he is good enough to do it) KG needs to challenge him on the court, and hopefully this will turn him back into the old lebron that cant beat us. Pierce should guard Wade and keep his cool but make Wade lose his.I really feel like if this Celtics team keeps doing what they do, and dont figure out a way to turn the Heat back into what they were then they are done. If they stay with their man and stop helping as much its going to take options away that they seem to know are going to be there. I think our team defense is our greatest strength, but Riley ( because I refuse to belive Erica is that good of a coach) has turned our greatest strength against us and it is becoming our biggest weakness against this adjusted Heat team. We only need to rattle the Heat for one game they have proven that when something goes wrong for them they have a hard time getting it back together. COME OUT OF YOUR COMFORT ZONE DOC. CHANGE THE GAMEPLAN OR THE HEAT WILL END IT IN FIVE GAMES OR SOONER. just my opinion
so who should end up defending bosh
Allen?
I mean your saying pierce defends wade, Garnett defends James, and i believe Oneal and rondo will defend the players in the same position. That leaves us with Allen.
" I really think that they are using our help defense against us."
I totally agree with this.
We have got to stop doubling so early and aggressively. We need to get back to playing our normal defense.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
There is an element of machismo that enters the ref debate
…where folks feel “good teams play through it,” or “champions make no excuses,” etc. Of course, this is completely faulty, with little relationship to reality.
The reality is more complex than a few points swung one way or the other. The refs dramatically affect the game in many ways — some obvious, some not. Their fouls affect the score, sure…. but they also determine who’s on the floor. The number of fouls on a player directly changes the way he plays, especially on defense. And then there’s the deeper stuff. What happens to a team when it realizes the zebras are screwing them over? When they recognize (or just feel) that whatever they do, the calls are going to go against them… are they going to play as hard? What would you do?
I am reminded of last year’s Finals game 3, when it was obvious from the start that the zebras would not let the Cs win… and they played like it.
There are things we know, and things we don’t know. Here’s something nobody knows: Nobody knows what would have happened in the Cs’ last two games if the referees had officiated both games fairly. You can SAY ‘the Celtics were outplayed’ — but there’s no way to KNOW what would have happened in fair games. That is a fact. One of the few we have.
No conspiracy talk here. I don’t know why the refs do what they do… I just know they do it. And they impact games dramatically, always have. Watch an NCAA game and the difference is striking. The refs make mistakes there too, but far fewer, and evenly.
So the NBA is still rotten. Big news, eh? That’s what happens when there’s too much money sloshing around, I suppose. Maybe it’s inevitable, I don’t know. I know there’s an easy way to fix it — just install video refs and take most of the power away from the refs. But none of that is going to happen, clearly, because the people who run this ‘sport’ like it the way it is.
Even the players and coaches are in on it, you know. Not in any conspiracy. But with their silence. It’s not the fines that keep them quiet… it’s not wanting to rock the million-dollar boat. The NBA feeds them all, and their families, and so what if the zebras screw them over from time to time? The money still flows, and that’s the bottom line. It would be for you too.
So what to do? For me, the answer is pretty simple. Walk away. Don’t invest your emotions in what amounts to a giant scam. I’m going to do that. Promise.
Yes I will.
One of these days.
We need the swagger back!
We need to be tougher that the Heat. The first 2 games they had their way with us. We need to return the favor. We need the intense KG not the timid one. We need the quick and speedy Rondo not the one that hangs out on the perimiter. We need PP to drive, get fouled and go to the line. We need to get Ray wide open looks by setting hard screens, We need JO to dominate the post. No easy baskets without a hard fouls.
Make sure the foul is not above the neck though because we know who the ref’s and Davis Stern want in the finals.
chemistry is an issue. but remember the fab four have been playing with JO for only a week or two. if they had two months with JO, then the starting five may mesh again.
chemistry matters, but chemistry with a new player can be developed. my hunch is that if JO had played all season, the team would have chemistry. perkins isn’t the only object of chemistry. i liked perk and wish we hadn’t lost him.
Good God this is a depressing thread.....
Sitting here in a hotel in New Delhi looking for some optimism in anticipation of Game 3 tomorrow and most of the posts look like they are prep material for our inevitable demise. Better to stay away and think positive on my own. Bleed Green!
by McHaleinthepost on May 6, 2011 10:57 AM EDT reply actions









































