Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

Would You Trade Rajon Rondo For Chris Paul?

David West unexpectedly decided to opt out of his contract this week.  That is one big domino that might force New Orleans to seriously consider trading cornerstone point guard Chris Paul.

West likely done in New Orleans - NBA - Yahoo! Sports

His decision could be a prelude to the eventual departure of All-Star guard Chris Paul(notes), who has played his entire career with West in New Orleans. The Hornets might have to trade Paul next season before he reaches free agency in 2012 and start a complete rebuilding process.

If New Orleans wants a young, super-talented point guard who (unlike Paul) is locked up long term on a deal that is actually quite a bargain, their best option would be to trade for Rajon Rondo.  To make salaries work the Celtics would actually have to add a player to the trade - perhaps a signed and traded Jeff Green.

The Hornets would likely want to try to offload the contract of Emeka Okafor in exchange for an expiring contract like Ray Allen or Kevin Garnett (perhaps with a wink wink deal to release them?), but I really don't think the Celtics would seriously consider such a drastic move unless they've hit the detonate button on The Window and asked for lots of draft pick sweeteners to boot.  Though you could argue that trading Rondo would be a nuclear option anyway, even if the return was Chris Paul.

Danny Ainge has already indicated that no player is untouchable on the roster.  So the question for you Celtics fans is - would you do it?

Feel free to post your best trade proposals and debate the merits of each. but remember to comply with the "treat all posters with respect" rule that we enforce strictly here.

Poll
Would you trade Rajon Rondo (and filler) for Chris Paul?
Yes
2676 votes
No
1993 votes

4669 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 169 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No

Rondo is the most underappreciated player on this team. Although people say that “so goes Rondo, so go the Celtics”, it’s really all about Rajon. His playmaking and decisions (and toughness) is something this team survives on. Trade him for Chris Paul and you get back a better player on paper but the chemistry and knowledge Rondo has is more useful to the Celtics than CP3’s buckets.
We need Rondo.

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:04 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

Give the team a chance in 2011-12. Then think of rebuilding the team

by vgarcia890 on Jun 27, 2011 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree fully as Rondo goes so do the C's...

he is the C’s quarterback and spark plug of the Celtic engine…but if Rondo goes, not on the court but in exchange for Paul and gives the C’s a better shot at acquiring Howard, I think you must make that trade for the C’s best interests and the improved chances of winning more titles with that core.

by fordescort on Jun 27, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

why do folks think "getting CP" == "getting Howard" ???

where is that equation coming from?

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 27, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I at least...

never said getting Paul = or guarantees getting Howard.

I just think since Howard wants to play with Paul as has been reported in the past (see links below for one example), if Paul was to sign with the C’s it may improve the chances of maybe luring Howard to come to play in Boston also.

 http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/30/dwight-howard-wants-to-play-with-chris-paul-jameer-who/

by fordescort on Jun 28, 2011 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

that seems like a pretty tenuous reason on which to blow up the team for.

Howard might also prefer to have a more complete team around him for a change.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well you...

First asked why do some think getting Paul means getting Howard and I answered it with a one possible valid reason.
Now you are saying its a tenuous reason to which I disagree.

If you can acquire a talent like Paul and it increases the chance of luring Howard to Boston (since Howard wants to play with Paul) and the you have the chance to add to your team possibly the 2 best players at there positions in the NBA (which does not come along often), I think its not a tenuous reason to acquire them both, but a very smart reason which is in the Celtics franchises best interest.

Howard and Paul would be expensive to acquire and Danny would have to make the numbers work to acquire them to have enough money to acquire additional talent to surround them with.
But we have seen teams before acquire expensive combination of superstars and still be able to add decent lower cost players around them to compete for titles just like the Lakers did with Kobe and Shaq in the late 90’s, the C’s did with the big 3 in 08 and the Heat have done currently with the big 3 of Lebron, Wade and Bosh.

by fordescort on Jun 28, 2011 8:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't say it was a tenuous reason for getting them both.

I said it is a tenuous reason for blowing up the team, which you would be doing if you are talking about exchanging Rondo and Green and peripherals for CP and peripherals.

If you had a guarantee that getting CP would bring Howard here, then yeah, that’s a different situation. But I don’t read Howard’s words up above as a guarantee by any stretch.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok....

but I still disagree it would be tenuous even if we did not get both Paul and Howard together.

If you get Paul to come to Boston and it gives you a better shot (even though its not a guarantee) of luring Howard to Boston, even if he does not end up coming to Boston and we end up with just Paul, I think it would still be very much worth to do, since at least you have a shot of getting the 2 best players in there positions in the NBA, which is not a opportunity that comes across often.

Also if Howard does not come to Boston, the C’s could always go after some other star player, in place of Howard (via free agent signing or trade transaction) to play alongside Paul, using the money they would of spent on Howard and down the line the $$ that is freed up when Pierce’s huge $17 million contract expires at the end of 2013.

Just my 2 cents worth though.

by fordescort on Jun 28, 2011 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think thats a non issue

Paul is a better player than Rondo and would help the Celtics now and in the future more than Rondo could. With or without Howard.

by AussieGreen on Jun 28, 2011 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

He also costs a lot more.

Which doesn’t help the Celtics in the future in acquiring other talent.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Then we will be looking at naohter +20 years of insignificance post Big 3.

Tthe way Miami mishandled us & that they are still a young team with a good 7-10 years run, we really will be on our way to another +20 years of insignificance if we don’t retool soon.

Getting CP3 & Dwight is a “once in a lifetime opportunity,” we have that chance now yet it’s such a narrow window of opportunity that may close soon & so, we better not squander it given the fact that we’re the team amongst top NBA team with the best chance to make it happen.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!

CP3: Same passing abilities (perhaps even better), better shooter. Chris Paul is a superior player. It’s that simple. He’s arguably the best PG in the league. He almost beat the Lakers in the playoffs with a starting 5 of: Bellinelli, Ariza, Landry and Okafor.

And if we acquire Paul, we get a shot at Dwight Howard. It might sound impossible, but it’s true.

When J.J. Barea dominates Mike Bibby and Mario Chalmers and Rondo doesn’t, you know something is wrong (and yes, he got injured, but he didn’t do much before that).

This is like not wanting to trade Eric Gordon for Kobe Bryant or Rudy Gay for LeBron James or Josh Smith for Kevin Garnett (in his prime). Ridiculous.

by Celticsdude on Jun 27, 2011 6:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah

but this team crashes and burns with no Rondo on the team. He is the link between Doc and the players, he is the man who sets everything up. CP3 won’t have that. He’ll get his buckets and assists but I’m SURE that the Big 3 (and mostly Ray) would fall off because they are used to Rondo’s pinpoint passes. Not to mention the fact that Doc would have to change the team’s playbook and that’s not what veterans like to see.

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

CP3 won’t have what? Watch the tape. The guy is a willing passer. He trusts his teammates even if they suck, and his teammates absolutely sucked last year!

by Celticsdude on Jun 27, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't mean it by that

I meant that Rondo feels every player in Beantown and knows where they will be every second. His mind is like a clockwork on the court. CP3 is a willing passer, but he just doesn’t have that awesome chemistry.

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

And CP3 can score at will which Rondo can't.

Ggiven our Big 3’s advancing age, they surely need another scoring option especially towards the end of a pivotal game like last year’s loss to LA, or this year’s loss to Miami.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

???

cp3 is a consistent 10assist per game yearly… besides being a better shooter and scorer.

if this will precede a dwight howard signing, then go for it!

by jaimsitecom on Jun 27, 2011 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!

Did I forget to say yes? For all the reasons above. This team, next year, can WIN IT ALL, but not without more scoring.

Rondo is an amazing assist man, but the guys receiving those passes are 1) passing them up (KG) and 2) missing them (Big Baby). We rely on Pierce and Ray Allen too much to score. When they go, so do the Celts.

Paul would add scoring, and still rack up nice assists. Let’s get another banner! Plus, Paul will be the reason why FAs will want to come to Boston. Not Rondo. Sorry, but for all his assists you don’t hear guys talking about wanting to play with him like they did about Steve Nash and Jason Kidd.

by No Nickname on Jun 27, 2011 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?

Hell no. Look at Dwight — he’s working out with Rondo during the summer. OJ Mayo said he would like to play with Rajon. Truth is, players would LOVE to play with a pass-first guy like RR. Second, there is no Ray Allen if there is no Rondo. Their sync off screens and passes on target are amazing.

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

no ray if there's no rondo?

what did ray do all of those years before he played with rondo? what did he do in ‘08 when rondo wasn’t a great player?

by Celticsdude on Jun 27, 2011 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ray in Seattle > Ray in Boston

if we look at individual play. His game in Boston is based on action off screens. Note how Ray’s results went up this year, much like Rondo’s level of play.

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

A few things...

1) I don’t think Dwight is actually working out with Rondo; that was a joke;

2) Dwight has specifically mentioned wanting to play with Chris Paul, apparently (Link);

3) Rondo and Paul are both superb passers, and Paul actually has a significantly better assist-to-turnover ratio;

4) Ray would be great playing with either player. It’s not like Ray and Rondo have perfect chemistry; they’ve clashed numerous times, and Ray quietly complained about his shot attempts toward the end of the year.

The only reason I would hesitate at all would be if team doctors had injury concerns. Otherwise, it’s CP3 all the way for me.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

by Roy_Hobbs on Jun 27, 2011 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

im big on not trading rondo but i got to admit

getting okafor, paul for rondo and green, ray and then getting ray back for vet min would be very very very tempting and i might even do it. assuming of course paul is healthy and signs and extension

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 27, 2011 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely agree. I’d move Rondo for CP3 unquestionably.

by CoachBo on Jun 27, 2011 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

#1

No brainer.

by Big_Easy on Jun 27, 2011 10:47 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Totally agree.

I wrote about this after we were eliminated. With Paul, teams have to play us 5 on 5 to respect his shot. And when he gets to the free throw line, he makes them. Free agents will still want to come here if Paul comes, and perhaps Howard comes in 2012 as well. No evidence of this other than the snippets I have read, but Doc has some kind of relationship with DH. With Phil Jackson and Jerry Sloan gone, how many coaches are out there that players truly want to play for? Not many but Doc is one of them and I think DH would want to play for him.

by JPV on Jun 28, 2011 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is no Ray Allen if there is no Rondo

What a slap in the face to the great walter ray allen. That’s just disrespectful

by FanFromMaine on Jun 28, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey Celtic brother, we're on the same page!

Don’t know why our other fellow C’s fan doesn’t realize that we really can revamp big time if we get CP3 & that we’re the team amongst all top NBA teams that has the best chance to get both CP3 & Dwight.

Pair the 2 with our Big 3 & we’ll be looking at 4-5 peat in the next 5-6 years, then we go after Durant in 2016 since we’ll have 1 more space for another superstar post Big 3.

If not Durant, atleast a “CP3/Dwight combo” is a good building block to rebuild again post Big 3.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

This truly is a no brainer. CP3 is a superior player to Rondo in almost every facet of the game. Shooting, driving, passing, defence, strength, decision making … shooting. I would say that Rondo is quicker though, that’s about it. If we had Paul there would be no more help defence off the Celtics point guard because he can’t shoot. I would do this trade in a heartbeat.

by AussieGreen on Jun 27, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, unless of course CP3 signs an extension. Gotta say that would improve our chances of luring Dwight.

by markgent on Jun 27, 2011 6:16 PM EDT reply actions  

CP3 will not sign an extension even if D. West stays, CP3 wants to join a super team!

CP3 wants to win bad, & so does Dwight!

CP3 wants to go to NY or Miami because he wants to win, but that’s not possible since NY& Miami doesn’t have space.

Boston’s the next best thing because we have space next year for Dwight even if we get CP3 this year, & still have PP & quite psosibly, KG & Ray re-signing for another championship run.

Not to mention that we will be so attractive with such a team & coach [& GM] that by 2012, old but still solid guys like Vince, Jamison, T-Mac, Nash, & etc. may join us for the vet minimum in order to finally win a ring or 2 before retiring.

But we better beat LA for CP3!

LA may be extremely quiet about it but they’re surely devising a scheme now for a CP3 offer.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

not really true

if the CBA raises the cap to $62m, with billups coming off the books the knicks could add paul if he wanted to go there. of course the bench would look like miami’s

"Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die."

im gonna be all up on you like a spider monkey!

by remembering9ergods on Jun 27, 2011 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did Paul tell you he was joining a ‘super team’? Cos you seem fairly sure of this.

by IsItTheShoes on Jun 28, 2011 12:06 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yes, provided...

a.) CP3 signs a multi-year extension.
b.) NO add two 1st rounders (this year and 2014).
c.) NO adds Aaron Gray.

Love Rajon. But if this will be the offer. I say yes.

by Yoki R on Jun 27, 2011 6:25 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm impressed with the poll

Rondo is a well-liked Boston player for a reason. The hustle he has shown in Celtic Green is laudable and a great way to get our respect.
But Paul is a better player and probably a better shot at title 18 in this window

by CelticPride on Jun 27, 2011 6:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes indeed.

Not only a better shot for title 18 but also, a better shot for Dwight!

You get CP3 & Dwight, then you attract 1 more superstar post Big 3. Can we say kevin durant in 2016?

If not KD, it will surely be some other superstar.

Then we’ll be looking at title 26 in a 10 year period!

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love Rondo but questioned his professionalism after the Perk trade.

He was rightfully affected by it, but as a pro making millions of dollars whose team is in the thicket of a title chase, he needed to put his head down and play. Instead he sulked at times during the season which might have cost us a couple of games.

by JPV on Jun 28, 2011 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I love Rondo

but its Chris freakin’ Paul. You make the deal if its on the table, no questions asked. The only issue is CP3’s health, and if he has a clean bill, there should be no hesitations.

by dococ23 on Jun 27, 2011 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Hi Jeff, you beat me to this question.

I just read the news on D. West.

Once he’s gone, CP3 will surely not sign an extension prompting Orleans to trade him sooner than expected.

As I have kept posting here in Celtic blog so many times, if we want Dwight Howard to come to us, we better get CP3!

Don’t know why so many fellow C’s fans doesn’t think it’s possible nor CP3 & Howard along our Big 3 not championship material.

Hell, they will 4-5 peat if this ever happen which is very realistic!

All we have to do is get CP3 first, then Dwight will come to us. It’s like back in 2008 when KG didn’t want to go to Boston. But once we got Ray, he quickly changed his mind.

Now, if almost 39 yo J.. Kidd is still playing well & it looks like he still have a 2 more solid years in his tank, our Big 3 looks to be that way too!

I mean, 5 years from now, a 40 yo KG will surely be as effective as a 38 yo PJ Brown , while a 41 yo Ray will be as effective as J.Kidd whereas 38 yo PP will be the same age as Kidd now who’s still balling.

With CP3 & Dwight in their prime, such a Celtic team can easily 4-5 peat!

And given our solid draftees & young players (& solid free agents in their mid 30’s joining us for the vet minimum to finally win a ring or 2), we really can 4-5 peat.

And so, we better beat LA who’s surely thinking of a package now for CP3 knowing that this will make Dwight come their way too.

But we have to remember that Boston has the best chance of all top echelon NBA team to get both CP3 & Dwight, as I have mentioned how it can be done in my previous posts.

And to all the Dwight critics, I’ll tell you this:

Once he gets to play with our Big 3 & our outstanding coach, rest assure he will finally know how to win & bring us multiple championship along CP3. That’s just how good our coach & Big 3 are in mentoring young, immensely-talented players.

Superman II will become Green Lantern! Or, Superman II joining our Green Lantern corp will bring us multiple rings & possibly even un-retire Superman I.

We better not let Superman II fall into that yellow spectrum of power & join that sinister Kobe, that will be our end!

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 6:43 PM EDT reply actions  

hahaha...

and timely! just watched the green lantern yesterday. Kobe=Sinestro!

 - laker fan

the greatest gift we have is life, the greatest mistake we can make is to return it unopened.

by designmao on Jun 27, 2011 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

"All we have to do is get CP3 first, then Dwight will come to us."

And you know this … how?

Further – this implies a dichotomy: “If we have Rondo, then Dwight won’t come to us.” Again, you know this … how?

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 27, 2011 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds nice, but not happening...

CP3 would look good in green and white, but Rondo has great chemistry with the starters so I doubt that trade is realistic Let’s be real Chris Paul is not going to Boston he’s going to the Knicks it’s that simple. Why would Chris come to Boston and play with aging stars that’s likely to retire after the 2012 season.

The Knicks can trade Billups(35) for Paul which could possibly happen.

by C'sFanfrmNy on Jun 27, 2011 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Nope, Orleans will look for the best exchange for CP3.

Surely, it’s not old Billups!

It will only be an equally-young & talented PG which is Rondo.

LA can offer Bynum & Brown to match CP3’s salary, it will be the best offer of any NBA team especially if D. West leaves.

But if we offer Rondo, Green, & BBD (via “sign & trade”) & Jajuan, then we get CP3.

It may sound like giving-up a lot but if we get CP3, we WILL get Dwight via free agency next year.

In the mean time, we still will be in the championship hunt with CP3 & the Big 3 because there will be solid, mid-30’s free agents out there who will come to us for the vet minimum in their hpoe to finally win a ring or 2.

But just remember, no CP3, no Dwight Howard!

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I here u, but...

I see Chris Paul going to the Knicks for Billups. I could see Danny pulling the trigger if can get CP3.

by C'sFanfrmNy on Jun 27, 2011 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry to all those who wanted to fight me

It’s real late here, but if you want, I can defend Rondo in the AM. :)

by GeeZee on Jun 27, 2011 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

YES

Yes, absolutely. Paul is simply better than Rondo. It’s not blowing anything up when you’re upgrading. Paul gives this team a better chance of winning it all next year AND is more of a marquee attraction for big name free agents in the long term.

Paul does everything Rondo does, pass, steal, run a team but also scores at one of the most efficient rates in the league. Rondo doesn’t. Paul’s a complete player, Rondo isn’t. You also know that Paul can run a team and put up great numbers without being surrounded by HOFers. You don’t know that about Rondo.

by Galeto on Jun 27, 2011 6:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Rondo could be a complete player if he get’s a jumper. lol

by C'sFanfrmNy on Jun 27, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well it took Ason Kidd without a J some time to get to where he is.

He’s still not the best shooter, but I wish Rondo picked up a bit of Jason Kidd.

by JoT on Jun 27, 2011 11:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe

We should all chip in and buy him one.. lol

by AussieGreen on Jun 27, 2011 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rondo has a jumper.

He just doesn’t have a free throw shot.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 27, 2011 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

What do you base this on?

Because from what I’ve seen Rondo has probably the worst jump shot out of any starting PG in the league.

by AussieGreen on Jun 28, 2011 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Then you haven't seen everything.

Rondo takes the majority of his shots from two distances. He takes the biggest portion (47%) at the rim (dunks, layups). His next biggest portion (36%) he takes between 16 and 23 feet. This is where he takes 68% of his jump shots. From that range, Rondo shot 41%.

That was tied for 10th among full-time PGs. And the list of ‘shooters’ who shot worse than Rondo from that range includes quite a few notable names, including Derek Rose, Russel Westbrook, Devin Harris, Collison, Fisher, Parker, etc., etc.

The idea that Rondo doesn’t have a jump shot is a myth. He has a jumper. He just doesn’t take a high volume of jump shots.

Rondo’s only real significant weakness remains at the free throw line.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Give me a break

Stats only count for so much. Rondo is not as good from mid range as any of those guys you mentioned.

by AussieGreen on Jun 28, 2011 3:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Um ... ok.

I guess you won that argument. Very compelling.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

You can take your empirical evidence elsewhere thanks!

by IsItTheShoes on Jun 28, 2011 10:58 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Probably not. I don’t trust CP’s knees at this point.

by Chief Macho on Jun 27, 2011 6:55 PM EDT reply actions  

CP3 for Rondo?

It sounds like a good idea, but I see Chris Paul going to the Knicks as his first choice. He’s been hinting at going to NYK from last season.

by C'sFanfrmNy on Jun 27, 2011 6:58 PM EDT reply actions  

He cannot go to the Knicks, NY just don't have space.

If Orleans tell CP3 that Boston has an enticing offer, CP3 will give it a go knowing that he can get his pal Dwight H. to come to Boston next year & form a super team which will be actually better than a super team in NY since D. Howard is better than Amare…

…while our Big 3, young players, & possibly old but stilll solid free agents on their way to join Boston for the vet minimum to finally win a ring or 2 before they retire will be BETTER versus Melo & the rest of NY.

And so, CP3 will really approve a trade to Boston, but we will have to give-up some good players in order to beat LA’s possible strong offer. (Don’t think for a second that LA’s not thinking of getting CP3!)

But just remember, Boston has THE BEST talent to exchange for CP3, then the most space next year to go after Dwight. This is where we beat LA, NY, Miami, & all the other top NBA teams.

We better not pass-up this once in a lifetime opportunity! And so, it’s really worth going after CP3 if we ever want to get Dwight.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

It can really happen given our talents to offer.

But we will have to cough-up Rondo, Green, BBD (via sign & trade), & maybe even Jajuan if Orleans wants him included.

If we get CP3, we will get Dwight next year!

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Danny can get CP3 & Dwight...

It would easily surpass him acquiring KG & Ray in `07.

These guys are still in their prime years.

by Title 18 on Jun 27, 2011 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've seen Paul play in that Lakers playoff series

he was amazing, a transcendent star and a clutch finisher, Rondo is very, very good but he may never be clutch like Paul

Here’s my trade proposal Jeff:

Boston Trades:

Rajon Rondo – Salary 9.09 Mil 4 Years
Ray Allen – Salary 10 Mil 1 Year
Jeff Green – Qualifying offer 5.9 Mil 3 Years (Sign and Trade)
Glen Davis – Qualifying offer 3 Mil 2 Years (Sign and Trade)
Jermaine O’Neal – 5.8 Mil 1 Year
Future First Rounder

New Orleans Trades:

Chris Paul – Salary 14.9 Mil 3 Years
Emeka Okafor – Salary 11.5 Mil 3 Years
Trevor Ariza – $6.3 Mil 3 Years

Like you mentioned Jeff, there should be a “sweetheart” in place to bring release Ray and have him come back for the Vet Min, that has to happen to first

Trevor Ariza should also be traded to replace Green, let’s face it, Trevor Ariza can give us back what we’ve been sorely missing since Posey.

Emeka Okafor is a more than suitable replacement for J.O.

One more element to add to this would be to sign Carl Landry to the MLE, his ex-teammates could help convince him to come to Boston, if not him then Aaron Gray

This could be the new line up

PG Chris Paul, Arroyo, Bradley
SG R.Allen, D.West, E.Moore
SF Pierce, T.Ariza
PF K.Garnett, C.Landry, J.Johnson
C Okafor, (FA Center for Vet Min)

That on paper is a deeper and more talent team than the one we have now with the potential to win a championship in a 2 year window

by Banner 18 on Jun 27, 2011 7:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Okafor got hammered by the Lakers bigs.

Why would the Celtics want to have a small lineup? If u told me they could get Dalembert, then I would think about it.

On second thought, why would NO consider releasing Allen? They could do some damage with the team they had.

by 17wasEZ on Jun 27, 2011 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

That trade will never happen.

Aside from the fact that it makes us smaller at the 5 and saddles us with 3 years of 32.7M committed to just 3 players – two of which it is doubtful are worth that much, there is a) no way NO makes that trade without the intention of keeping Allen which means b) Allen himself would never okay the deal and c) even if he did, without Allen coming back we are giving up WAY TOO MUCH TALENT in that trade. We’d be giving up the best 3P shooter of the NBA as of last season at the 2 and also end up smaller (6’ 10") at the 5.

You’d basically drop from a ‘Big 4 plus JO’ down to a ‘Big 3’ of CP, Pierce & KG plus D-West & Okafor. That is not a championship caliber team.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 27, 2011 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course it all hinges on Allen coming back

and if a deal works for him to return, that line up can get you through to east

Okafor is a mediocre center and as you say, undersized at 6’10" but he played 72 games for NO and averaged 10.3 pts 9.5 rpg and 1.8 blkpg, for 31.8 minutes per game – J.O. for all his size and skill, will never play a 72 game/ 30 minute per game season again – we’ll be lucky to have him play 2 months at 20 minutes per game not including the playoffs for the same kind of production

and then there’s Ariza, who played a great series against his old Lakers in the playoffs, he can give you what you want out of Jeff Green and Davis off the bench, no need for Green to learn to be more aggressive and Baby to get his head on strait, Ariza is locked on and can be a great 6th man

I also like the idea of Landry for the MLE as I mentioned above, sure he’s undersized but he’s very productive, in the Lakers series, he averaged 15.6 pts 5 reb 0.6 blks 0.8 stls 1 asst playing 36 minutes per 5 games. Baby Davis could not get you that kind of numbers.

So simply put Okafor > inconsistent J.O., Ariza > Green for 6th man, Landry > Baby

and that lineup with Allen back is more a championship caliber team than what we have right now

the only downside is all that salary that’s locked on for three years and like you said, a deal like this won’t get done due to that cause in three years, the grand prize is Dwight Howard and we all know that he’s the key championship greatness right?

by Banner 18 on Jun 28, 2011 6:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes!

As long as Paul’s knee checks out ok long term. I love Rondo but Paul can do everything he does plus carry a team scoring when needed to.

To make the numbers work I guess Green would have to be thrown in. So I would possibly ask for a #1 draft pick in return to offset that.

by JBcat on Jun 27, 2011 7:09 PM EDT reply actions  

They will not give a 1st round pick

We have to remember that we’re not the only team who will go after CP3, LA will have a very strong offer that we may actually have to include Jajuan too along Green + some future 1st or 2nd round picks just to beat LA or anyone else.

Still, it will be worth it because if we get CP3, we’ll get Dwight too!

Then we get Durant in 2016 or some other superstar (Blake G anyone?) because a CP3/Dwight combo post Big 3 will be attractie for anyone wanting to win bad.

Overall, we Celtic Nation need to be thinking long term! We need to stop being too overtly sentimental as that will impede progress.

We SURELY love Rondo, but CP3 is slightly the better player who will attract superstars to join him.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Am a Huge Homer

and an ‘apologist’ for almost anybody on the roster, not to mention a huge Rondo fan.

That being said,Chris Paul, when healthy, is in my opinion, clearly the best point guard in the league.

That said, I don’t know if I trust his knees.

But both at 100%, I don’t think anybody can argue that Rondo is better than CP3.

by KGHurtYourFeelings on Jun 27, 2011 7:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Believe me

People will argue the last sentence with you on CB … the love for Rajon is that strong.

Like I said, if CP3’s knees are healthy, this is a no brainer.

by dococ23 on Jun 27, 2011 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not only the best point guard in the league

I think he’s also a top 5 player in the league in terms of being able to dominate playoff games consistently. He’s one of the few that could lead a team to a title without an absurd amount of talent around him. I think that level of players is Kobe, Lebron, Dwight, Dirk, and CP3. Duncan has fallen out of that group just this year IMO and Durant and Rose aren’t quite there yet. Dirk and Kobe will fade out of that group soon enough, but CP3 Lebron and Dwight should hang around there for several more years.

by action781 on Jun 27, 2011 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

No

Rondo is a pass first pg, Paul is a shoot first pg. I’ll take Rondo. If you want to play as a team you need Rondo. He is most effective when surrounded by good players. Once the “Big Three” end their careers Rondo would still be my guy to build around if you can surround him with good players. Rondo will make those players better, Paul will not.

"I don't come to play, I come to WIN"--Larry Bird
"Criminally Negligent Officiating"--Tommy Heinsohn

by TrueGreen on Jun 27, 2011 7:27 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

that's not true

Paul makes his teammates better. He is not a shoot first pg. Watch the tape. More than willing passer who shoots when he has to and is not afraid of crunch time.

by Celticsdude on Jun 27, 2011 7:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's Crazy Talk

Paul isn’t a shoot first point guard. He is a better decision-maker than anybody else in the league, and probably the best passer as well.

He obviously shoots more than Rondo, but that is because Rondo can’t shoot.

I also don’t think that anybody makes the players around him better than CP3. He always puts the ball in the right spot.

And again, I love Rondo. On an emotional level, I wouldn’t want to trade him, and again, you could even make the argument that you don’t trust Paul’s knees. But as far as basketball, CP3 is better(at 100%)

by KGHurtYourFeelings on Jun 27, 2011 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

@KGHurtYourFeelings

100% agree.

P.S.: Chris Paul played 80 total games in the regular season, which is pretty encouraging.

by Celticsdude on Jun 27, 2011 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, He's Not Coming Here Anyway,

and I’m glad because I’m a UK grad and Rondo and I went to school at the same time, and honestly, I’m a fan and I like rooting for Rondo…

But yeah, CP3 is better.

However, I thought he looked like he lacked a lot of explosiveness during most of the regular season, but man, in the playoffs, he looked incredible at times. I’m curious to see how he starts out next season.

Personal biases aside, if you can get the best PG in the league, you have to do it…but I’m not a GM.

by KGHurtYourFeelings on Jun 27, 2011 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rondo post Big 3 to build around with equates to another +20 years drought!

CP3 equates Nash & Kidd in their prime, a PG any superstar including Kobe would love to play with (it was only 3-4 years ago that Kobe really wanted Kidd.)

Rondo equatessomeone like Bibby, a very solid & effective PG in his prime with Sac. some years ago which challenged LA yet superstars back then still preferred Kidd or Nash.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree CP3 is Better than Rondo

but it seems like you’re selling him short. I think Rondo has the potential to be something really special, but he won’t really be able to define his legacy until the post-big 3 era.

I’m not guaranteeing anything, but I would like Rondo to be a Celtic so I can find out.

However, I really like Paul as a player. If he can ever fully return to 100% health(which I still don’t know that I would bet on), I think he could go down as one of the greatest PG’s of all time

by KGHurtYourFeelings on Jun 27, 2011 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

you kidding?

paul averages over 10 dimes a game… shoot first? he’s just a better scorer than rondo besides being a great passer. he makes his teammates look great too.

by jaimsitecom on Jun 27, 2011 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes I would!!!!

Even if you throw in Jeff Green. Jajuan Johnson can fill the spot of Jeff Green and maybe even contribute more than what we got from Green last season.

Just don’t include Emeka Okafor……that’s a deal breaker.

by LarryBird33 on Jun 27, 2011 7:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, cannot accept Emeka coz then, we won't have space for Dwight next year!

But in order to secure CP3, we may have to cough-up Jajuan too with Green & some future draft picks becuase there will be very strong competition out there especially LA who can offer Bynum & other solid players in order to offset the loss of D. West, if he does bolt-out of Orleans.

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bynum and Brown

are not a better offer than Rondo and Green, IMO. I don’t think we need to give up all the extras you suggest. I would recommend keeping JJ.

by VtCeltics on Jun 27, 2011 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said 'yes' outloud to this question.

People in my office are looking at me like, “Yes to what?”

by teaguelife on Jun 27, 2011 7:44 PM EDT reply actions  

well 1st cp2 wants to go to ny its obvious for that matter so i wouldnt do it unless he was signing a long extension

around a 4-5 year contract

but though danny might not think this but seeing rondo playing thru that horrific injury & coming up big for us in the last 3 playoffs i just cant imagine or fathom rondo in another team & i dont want to he’s a celtic cp3 is a bite size version of the melo,lebron mold wearing a yankees cap to the heat game i mean CMON

but seriously he’s going to the knicks he wants to build another big 3 with melo & stat he said it himself if its my decsion im not trading rondo for cp3 let alone a rondo-green combo for cp3

by stylo617617 on Jun 27, 2011 8:05 PM EDT reply actions  

NY doesn't have space, & so does the other top NBA teams like Miami, Chicago, etc.

Only way NY or the other top NBA teams can get CP3 is to trade Melo, D. Rose, LBJ [or Wade].

by Prester John II on Jun 27, 2011 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

they will after billups comes off the books next season via free agency so cp3 can just veto trades all the way till next summer

& btw im sure NO will explore trading for westbrook before rondo becuase since thier rebuilding they’ll need someone who can score & westbrook for cp3 makes perfect sence

by stylo617617 on Jun 27, 2011 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

No idea if workbable

..but yasssh if it were. You get distribution PLUS shooting minus the here today/gone tomorrow stuff. RR: enigmatic. Paul: an open book.

Oh, and ps keep CP3 away from Libby.

"Celtics bring order and structure to a chaotic world"

by Tenacious D on Jun 27, 2011 8:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Depending on Pauls health ...

I would consider trading him for Rondo straight up as I think Paul is a better all around player then Rondo especially on the offensive end of the court.

I would hesitate making the trade if Green had to go as I like him as a future replacement for Pierce and would prefer the C’s try and package another player like Baby and change along with Rondo to make the trade work out financially.

My mind would change of giving up both Rondo and Green for Paul though if thats the only way to acquire Paul and if acquiring Paul would increase the chance of Howard signing with the C’s.

by fordescort on Jun 27, 2011 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Its all about our beloved franchise...

 there’s no I in team. I might hate it but also might condone it if only for the greater good of the team.

by Papatrichs on Jun 27, 2011 8:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm so happy that there are so many "no's"

I hope Rondo stays in green for life.

People talk a lot about Chris Paul being the superior player when the biggest disadvantage of having Rondo rather than Paul is the lack of a jumper. Rondo’s jumper will improve next year, mark my words.

by bfrombleacher on Jun 27, 2011 9:01 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I think that...

Paul might actually make things better for Ray by drawing defensive attention as a credible (!) scoring threat.

by spinetingler on Jun 27, 2011 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

The best way to guard Rondo is to not guard him, sag off of him, guard the drive and help off of him because you want him shooting wide open mid range jumpers if your the opposition. You cant do that with Paul because he will kill you with those mid range jumpers all day if you let him.

by AussieGreen on Jun 27, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Paul gets traded it's to either Boston or New York

You have to remember the NBA runs the Hornets now. It’s not like this is the Denver situation, I don’t see New Orleans fighting with 2 or 3 teams trying to get them to up the ante and offer more players. The NBA gets to decide where Chris Paul will land. We all know the NBA is more popular when the New Yorks, Chicagos, L.A.‘s, and Bostons are contenders so I see the Chris Paul going there and I CP3 has said numerous times in inverviews all he wants to do is win NOW so I see him preferring Boston over New York if he thinks things through to win now since if he went to the Knicks they would have NO bench since they’d have to give up Billups, Fields and another bench player on an already weak bench.

by taylorgang34 on Jun 27, 2011 9:45 PM EDT reply actions  

No.

You guys should support another team.

in Boston we love toughness, heart, and i.q., aka what Rondo is all about

I would never trade him, he gave us more than we could ever dream of, including a ring.

by Juneauz on Jun 27, 2011 10:07 PM EDT reply actions  

not with that knee

CP3’s health is too much of a risk

by Phil125 on Jun 27, 2011 10:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Trust in Ainge!!!!!!!! NO to Rondo for CP3.

To begin with, you make it sound like a CP3 trade automatically gets us Dwight. That is not guaranteed by a long shot. I trust Ainge to know more about what is best than you guys who want to throw RR under the bus. That’s why he’s the GM and you are posting guarantees of how to get Howard. As for RR, Green, BBD, JuJuan, and draft picks for Paul, I have one comment…… are you insane?? Hell, let’s throw in KG and Doc too and even offer PP as part of that package. I wouldn’t do it straight up, let alone with add ons.

by CelticsUKfan on Jun 27, 2011 10:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Conditional yes...

  I would absolutely trade Rondo for Paul contingent upon two things.

1) Paul agrees to a long term extension
2) The Celtics don’t have to take on any other big contracts like Okafor that would take away their cap space in 2012.

by CelticsFanNC on Jun 27, 2011 10:21 PM EDT reply actions  

I really don't like poll like these

Yes, if they throw in 3 first rounder
No, if we throw in 3 first rounder

I (danny is the same) would only do the trade if it makes us better, which isn’t easy to do when you are trading 2 good players that are pretty healthy.
it really doesn’t make sense for such a trade to happen, NO will get a hand full of teams to overpay for CP3 and the Cs have no reason to do that, Rondo is a really good PG

need a change,a smart one

by aboubata on Jun 27, 2011 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Love Rondo and will stay supportive of him

but no question asked CP3. The only issue is his knees and if he can stay at least healthy with his knees then no questions asked CP3.

Throughout the season he was the pg that was under the radar in a sense while Rose stole all his shine, but when the playoffs hit and he played the Lakers the way he did in game 1 and game 4, I knew he was still the best pg in the game. He can pass, shoot, rebound, heck he can defend and has high basketball IQ. The only issue is whether he will stay and if he can stay healthy.

by JoT on Jun 27, 2011 11:06 PM EDT reply actions  

No Way

I can’t believe 60% want to trade Rondo and another player for Chris Paul, it seems like a lopsided trade imo, Rondo and say Jeff Green for Paul, you’re losing 2 assets in return for 1 and that 1 asset has knee problems, people don’t understand that his left knee is bone on bone, one more slight tweak or injury and he’s done and we’re left without are best and youngest talent for the future.

by OddsOn34 on Jun 27, 2011 11:40 PM EDT reply actions  

I would do it even though I am a big fan of Rondo

I do not think Rondo is overrated at all, he is probably underrated by most. However Chris paul can take over with scoring and is a much better shooter, plus he is a great defender too. Rondo is a top 5 PG, Chris Paul at his best is #1. Especially if are only comparing pure point guards (Rose is a combo guard).

by kg2128 on Jun 27, 2011 11:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm so tired of this question.

I wish NO would just do something with him to settle the issue so we can put a stake through this topic’s heart.

My opinion: LIke always, it would depend on the nature of the trade. But on the face of it: No way.

To make a trade work we’d have to give Rondo plus Green to make the salaries work and that is WAY too much talent to give up for Paul.

Lets set aside any arguments about whether CP is better than Rondo. The real question is whether he is 7M better. Because 7M buys you quite a bit of talent. If you swap Rondo for CP, you have to spend that 7M replacing Green first of all. Let’s assume you find a suitable replacement for the athletic young SF that you let go of. So you are 7M in the hole and you’ve made your team … marginally better. You have 7M less cap space with which to try to land Howard, who will take a max contract in order to bring here. You’ll probably have just enough room to squeeze him in … but your team will have no talent around him other than CP and Pierce and Jajuan. And no more cap room to get any. Is Howard going to want to come here for a recreation of Orlando’s situation the last few years?

If we got a first round draft pick back to sweeten it, I might consider it.

Otherwise, a team of Rondo, Pierce, Green, Jajuan & Howard PLUS an additional 7M to fatten the roster with sounds a lot more competitive to me. Probably to Howard as well.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

+ 1

Never would I give up Rondo and Green for Paul, its just too much talent moving out for a PG equal the skills of Rondo but only shoots better which actually is covered very much by Green. Defensively I’d say Rondo is better as well.

And im sure DH wouldn’t mind playing alongside Rondo, KG PP and Ray.

I really find it silly this argument that the CP3 post injury is really better than Rondo right now. The salaries alone are completely outrageously in favor for Rondo.

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on Jun 28, 2011 5:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I *love* Rondo, but...

… anyone saying that Rondo + Jeff Freaking Green > Chris Paul is looney. You make that trade in a heartbeat. Anyone would.

by bboisvert on Jun 28, 2011 12:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Its not just "Rondo + Green" vs "Paul"

Its

a) “Rondo + Green + 7M towards another player” vs

b) “Paul + 7M spent to replace Green”

THAT is the deal.

In scenario (a) you have two players and 7M towards bringing in a super star FA (or surrounding role players). In scenario (b) you have Paul and have to spend that money replacing that which you already had.

When both are healthy, just how much more valuable do you think Paul actually is over Rondo?

Statistically, Paul has the advantage, but it isn’t, imho, 7M worth. When healthy, Rondo’s total point creation has not been that far below Paul’s. And Paul can’t run the court by himself. You need a whole team to win a title. You can’t do it with just one or two super stars. Didn’t we all just learn this?

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 1:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

call me looney then....b/c CP3 is not > than Rondo and Green combined!!!!!

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on Jun 28, 2011 5:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

regarless of what WE think, is there any doubt Danny would do it??

None. None whatsoever. Trust me on this. WHEN NO accepts Rajon and filler for CP 3, CP is a Celtic. Danny has longed for Chris since the draft, has floated Rajon before anmd Cp is still a more complete player than Rajon. Do I need to add that injury history’s don’t dissuade Danny? Id give it 70% odds we get Chris, BUT in my mid the issue is Rajons great contract vs the unkown of CP’s.

by wahz on Jun 28, 2011 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

leverage

Rondo is great, but there is little risk and great reward with acquiring Paul.

1. Paul is young, good window
2. Paul is better offensively, much needeed
3. Paul has more “star power” for recruiting
4. Paul has strong ties to Dwight

But the biggest thing missing in these arguments is the lack of leverage NO has. Boston doesnt have to put up a monster offer for Paul. NO needs cost controlled value in return, but is limited in its options due to Paul’s deasire to win right away.

Boston is a much more attractive sell to Paul because of the cap management job Ainge has done. NY and Miami dont have the pieces to offer NO.

LA has Bynum, but they are not financially set up to acquire more pieces thereafter. Any Dwight package leaves with Bynum, the rest of LAs core is too old and has too many years on deals to be attractive to any but contenders.

Boston is in a unique position to offer NO a top 5 PG who is locked up lonb term. They are in the other conference and they have expiring deals and draft picks to make it work.

Paul signing long term is about salesmanship. Boston has the cap space to sign his pal Dwight and would have a solid core of young talent as well as retaining the vets potentially.

The big question is: can you get Paul/Howard to ztructure their deals in a way that creates enough czp space to offer KG and Ray enough to stick around

by BillfromBoston on Jun 28, 2011 12:39 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Rondo + picks does it

Unless another team will eat Okafors deal in the trade. At that point Boston would likely be forced to concede unless they were willing to offer a buyout that somehow freed their cap space back up in year two.

But if LA and NY are the prime competition, i dont see how either of them can make offers that satisfy both NO and Paul. LA can take on the money, but wouldnt be able to get Dwight. NY just has an inferior package and would have to hope Paul bits free agency.

Boston can offer both the talent NO wants and the opportunity to contend short and long term due to cap management.

I believe this will, in fact, happen once there is a labor agreement…..in 2012 sometime….

by BillfromBoston on Jun 28, 2011 12:51 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

that's a no brainer

 If we.don’t trade for.him then is probable.he’ll end up in.L.A. or with.a.conference rival.

by the.Doc on Jun 28, 2011 1:07 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Rondo + Green for CP3 + Ariza/Bellinelli..

I think that would be perfectly fair to both teams..
I’m just wondering, who else would NO want to trade CP3 to? surely other teams will have better offers.. and can we sign and trade a restricted FA (Green)?

by Rany on Jun 28, 2011 1:45 AM EDT reply actions  

The salaries don't work if its Ariza

‘Might work if its Bellinelli – but do we want Bellinelli? He did have a pretty decent year last season. I don’t know a ton about him, though.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Trade Rondo to get Paul (with KNEE INJURIES !!!) ??! - NO Thanks

Are you kidding me? This question can’t be seriously.

Rajon can’t shoot ?? You are kidding me!
Of course he doesn’t has a very good effi between 16 – 23 feet (41%) but thats better than Rose has. And dont forget that he is the best puzzle piece to win with the KG, RA and PP. It’s all about Chemistry.

And btw. I really don’t like Chris Paul. He seems to be cocky and arrogant. (He is playing so good for New Orleans, cause he MUST. The Hornets has no other shoot power then Paul.) Are you sure that Paul might be able to subordinate ?? I dont think so.

Rondo showed in the past that he has skills like very few point guards. He has the ability to dominate a game (with triple doubles!!).
I would be glad to see him retering in a Celtics Shirt.

by TomBeatz on Jun 28, 2011 3:47 AM EDT reply actions  

The amount of assumptions being passed off as fact in this post is insane. “Getting CP3 will mean we’ll get Howard!”. Please. Getting Paul means we’d be getting a point guard with a dodgy knee in exchange for Rondo and half our roster. It’s not worth it

by IsItTheShoes on Jun 28, 2011 4:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

HAHAHA....completely true..

I think most people over here are enamored of the Chris Paul of 2 or 3 yrs ago, lets all consider that CP3 is not as good as he was then. his averages this yr are really quite not eye popping to me. Yes he was better in the playoffs but we also saw how insane Rondo can be in the playoffs as a testament to what he did a yr ago. So Id really think twice about trading Rondo for Paul.(to even include Jeff Green is completely insane)

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on Jun 28, 2011 5:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of assumptions ....

One assumption that I find shaky is that Rondo is healthier than CP3. People have been citing Paul’s knee for cause of concern which I think is justified but only to a certain extent. Lets not forget Rondo has been playing on one (or even two) weak ankle(s) for quite sometime. And in the 2nd half of the past season when he was clearly not his own self, he admitted he was not healthy. We all saw how ineffective he could be when he was not 100%, just as Paul was slowed by a repaired and recovering knee.

And then, to make matter worse, his new elbow injury which looked downright horrible at time. How much will that affect his play? Only time will tell.

So if we have to talk about Paul’s knee, then I guess it is only fair to also consider Rondo’s health issue as well.

by getthat18now on Jun 28, 2011 7:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t forget his back.

This is a pretty simple discussion, really. But … is there a shred of legitimate evidence that this deal is even being discussed? I don’t see any at this point.

As I said when the season ended, I see no workable way that the Big 3 and Rondo can continue to exist together without wins continuing to decline. As mentioned above, Rondo initially was a perfect fit for the three front-line scorers. But KG, Ray and Pierce are in scoring decline, and you need look no further than our inability to close games in the Miami series for conclusive proof.

Meanwhile – despite the predictable attempts above to conflate Rondo’s offensive skills – he still isn’t a good enough perimeter shooter to warrant serious defensive attention. And his foul shooting is horrific, bad enough to keep him from consistently attacking the basket as he must do to remain some kind of offensive threat.

How you address this problem is open to debate. You can make a case that the Big 3 should be broken up and Rondo retained. However, you can also make a very conclusive case that Rondo should be shopped around. His offensive game is not developing, despite the conflation.

I’d be looking for something to sign, were I Danny and I had a Paul-for-Rondo deal on my desk. But I’ll believe the deal exists when I see it.

by CoachBo on Jun 28, 2011 7:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting Times

Needless to say, as it was with the time of the Ray & KG acquisitions, the next 15 months will be very interesting for celticsblog.

by celty86 on Jun 28, 2011 6:58 AM EDT reply actions  

I remember reading those blogs

And everyone was complaining how Danny traded for Allen because Allen and Pierce play the same game + Allen is old and has dodgy ankles. Then we traded half our roster for Garnett and everyone was complaining about how old the Celtics are overnight. Remind me, how did that turn out in the end?

by AussieGreen on Jun 28, 2011 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't trade

Rondo but Okafer would be a great Perk replacement

by calc on Jun 28, 2011 7:44 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Chris Paul

  Chris Paul is the only PG I would currently trade Rondo for.

  IMO Paul would help the Celtics offense because he can score at a higher clip then Rondo. With Pierce, KG and Ray no longer capable of carry an offense it is important to get scoring wherever we can.

  Paul would improve the Celtics offense without killing the defense like say….Steve Nash would.

by CelticsFanNC on Jun 28, 2011 8:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Precisely. The driving reason to make this deal is that we can no longer afford an offensively-challenged point guard and remain a title contender.

by CoachBo on Jun 28, 2011 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Love Rondo but...

  I love watching Rondo play when he is on his game, being aggressive on defense and getting into the open court. When he plays that way he is one of the most exciting players in the NBA.

 I am not a huge fan of Chris Paul mostly due to his demeanor on the court. He never looks like he is having fun playing basketball and he whines to the officials constantly. He’s seems very arrogant, even more so then Rondo.

  With that said I would still pull the trigger on a Rondo for Paul deal because he is the one PG out there I am certain would improve the offense without having a negative impact on our trade mark defense. D.Williams and Rose don’t defend anywhere near the level Rondo does. Steve Nash….come on now, his defense is absolutely horrible and he’s ancient. Paul though is a very good defender, possibly as good as Rondo and he would take the pressure off of the aging Big Three to carry the load offensively which to this point Rondo can not do with any consistency.

by CelticsFanNC on Jun 28, 2011 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Did you all forget about this?

Rondo is a celtic

by LiamB on Jun 28, 2011 8:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Players that won't get traded:

Rondo – He’s probably the best pass-first point guard in the league. The C’s want a pass-first point guard.
Green – Danny loves him and he’ll help this team in the future.
Allen – Can’t break up the Big 3
KG – Can’t break up the Big 3
Pierce – Trade him and Celtic nation will be screaming for Danny’s blood.
And trading for CP3 will kill space to land Howard. If we do match the salaries, we’ll be giving up too much talent. I might be the only one who thinks we have a better shot at Howard with Rondo but, If we get Paul, WE’RE OUT OF MONEY!!!! AND IF WE TRY TO CLEAR SPACE, WE’LL LOSE LOTS OF TALENT!!!!
My answer: NOT AT ALL!!!!

by Celtics own the refs on Jun 28, 2011 8:59 AM EDT reply actions  

If we give Big Baby 6 mil a year and sign an trade him with Rondo it works perfectly. We dont realistically want Glen, he doesn’t want to be here, he’s from Louisiana, NOH have just lost their starting PF, he wants to start, perfect deal.
Anything else and it’s not worth it. We could even get Aaron Gray too if we give Big Baby Davis $8 mil a year or something and Aaron Gray signs for $2mil a year. Isn’t a bad deal if its just Rondo and BBD, I’d take that.

by @JdotD on Jun 28, 2011 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

This (RR+BBD for CP)would be a preferable exchange over RR+JG for CP.

But I’m not sure NO makes that deal.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would. Rondo is a great player, and a great passer, but as we get deeper in the playoffs (and against bigger teams) his limitations show. Before his injury he just wasn’t scoring in the Miami series, despite having Bibby on him. The Lakers aren’t going anywhere, they’re most probably getting Dwight and are going to be just as big. Rondo didnt do crap against the Lakers in the Finals, he can pass but if Kobe is able to take time off when guarding him and just clog the lane it kills everything for us. Paul beat the Lakers pretty much by himself twice, Rondo could never do that.
If it was only for Rondo and say a sign and trade for BBD I’d do it. NOH might be on it now that David West had opted out too. Anything more and it’s not worth it. Rondo and Paul are the two best PGs in the league, and whilst Rondo is a great fit for us, think how amazing an extra 10ppg from our PG would be. And it’s not like Paul is going to steal any of the Big 3’s offense either, it’s a great fit. I’m happy with Rondo, but if we can get Paul for Rondo and Baby, I’d do it.

by @JdotD on Jun 28, 2011 9:42 AM EDT reply actions  

One huge perception that is wrong, imo

Is that CP3 = Howard. After the new CBA we might not even be able to PAY them both without breaking the CBA. Instead, we have Rondo locked up for long enough.

What’s more is that a veteran team like the Celtics couldn’t go through such drastic changes as swapping their starting (All-Star) point guards. What I keep saying here is that the trade looks terrific on paper but I don’t think it would pan out good in real life. Y’all were bashing Danny for the Perk trade but on paper the trade was great – Perkins is nowhere near Green. The argument was intangibles, toughness etc. etc… It’s the very same thing you are forgetting now when you ask for the Rondo trade! CP3 is better.. but you have to look at all the things Rondo brings and you wonder if Paul can duplicate that.

by GeeZee on Jun 28, 2011 9:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, YES, a million times YES

We need to score. CP3 can do that. AND he can pass just as well as Rondo. AND he can steal the ball better than Rondo. AND he can be a clutch player.
I’d love this trade.

by Master_Shake on Jun 28, 2011 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Always thought NO would be a logical destination for BBD ...

From a marketing stand point it’s no brainier. The Hornets are currently being bailed out by the NBA owners – ergo, adding a hometown hero certainly won’t hurt attendance . A straight up S/T for Landry would suffice, but now that JJ is in the picture can we assume he will be given some of Davis’ minutes? That would be risky since he’s nowhere near the defensive player Baby is.

So Landry would be good insurance making the trade package more palatable for us. Let’s not forget RR’s contract is valued based compared to CP3 or D. Will, so NO saves a few million over the next three years. BTW … Bradley, expendable in this scenario, is a team option next season. E’Twaun could be groomed as the future hybrid guard, and there’s G. Brown and a free agent SG to consider. So CP3/Landry for BB (S/T)/RR/AB and cash is worth talking about. Or perhaps CP3/A.Gray for BB/RR/AB.

by PortCelt on Jun 28, 2011 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

CP3+Howard=impossible

Our payroll-2012 in case we trade Rondo for CP3 and seek for Howard as free agent:
Pierce $16,790,345
Bradley $1,630,800
CP3 (player option in NO) $17,779,457
Howard (player option in Orlando) $19,261,200
Johnson+Moore appr. $1,500,000

$56,961,802 to six players.

Stern wants new СВА with $62M cap without exceptions.
So, Celtics will have appr. $5M to resign Green, KG, Allen, West and to add five more players to the roster. Is Danny a magician?

by Doctor56 on Jun 28, 2011 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes he is...

It is also feasible that Paul and Howard would sign extensions at a lower cost for more years. In fact, it is quite common for that to happen in the NBA.

by RickyD Fan on Jun 28, 2011 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

First off. I think we should NOT trade for CP3 for multiple reasons.
Rondo can be taught, eventually to be a good jumpshooter. You can’t teach CP3 to pass like Rondo does. Not talking about assist numbers but the things Rondo can do on the court by passing, CP3 can not.
CP3’s knee injury worries me. Yes he showed brilliance vs LAL in the first round but througout the regular season he wasn’t the same, he was good but not the same. I rather take 82 games of testing than a 6 game series to see how he can still play.
Rondo has showed that He Is a CELTIC. Now I know a lot of people think Celtic Pride is a bunch of BS & people just say it to sound like they’re diehards, etc. But Rondo played through a dislocated elbow, all to show that he has Celtic Pride. Please raise your hand if you didn’t think that was awe-inspiring. But in Boston, Celtic Pride is REAL & Rondo showed it.
Rondo is the BEST, PASSING PG in the leauge. Sure he can’t dunk like D.Rose or Westbrook, sure he can’t shoot like D.Will, Nash, or CP3. But they can’t pass like Rondo, not talking assist number wise, save it stat lovers.
A lot of people think Rondo can NOT shoot, point blank period. But in truth he can. He has a decent mid range, if you watched the entire season. IDK bout his 3 pointers but thats not the point. His TRUE flaws are his free throws and his turnovers. His FT %‘s are unforgivable, but he’ll work on em. Turnovers I think are a bit of the Big 3’s faults because they can’t keep up with Rondo’s pace.

Yes CP3 attracts a lot of FA. BUT, I think Dwight will be leaving to (If he even does leave) New Jersey. They have a good core working there. D.Will is a great PG to play along side Dwight & when they move to Brooklyn, Dwight gets his mainstream media.
To be perfectly honest I don’t want Dwight in a Celtics jersey. Yes, he IS the BEST Center in the leauge, hands DOWN but he doesn’t play with a fire. He plays like a child in a park with his dad, smiling everytime he makes a basket to look back to see if his Dad is proud of him. He shows sooo much immaturity on the court, this guy led the NBA in tech fouls. I prefer guys like Tyson Chandler & Kendrick Perkins who play TOUGH, no nonsense, intense basketball.

All in all, I think even though CP3 is a superior all around player to Rondo…We keep Rondo. It’s like cars really. I’m not a car expert so don’t expect a lot of detail about cars lol. CP3 is like the Camaro in the Transformers movies. Rondo is like that Gran Torino. The Camaro is faster, better looking, more reliable, more stable, almost everything better than that beat up, dirty Gran Torino. But damn it, that Gran Torino is MINE. I don’t care if it won’t start up in the morning when I’m running late to work, I don’t care if the paint is rusty, I don’t care if people don’t double-take when I drive down the street, I don’t care if I gotta manually pull up the windows rather than holding a simple button down to do it. I don’t care if the AC sucks in the car. It’s MINE & I rather have this beat up Gran Torino than any of these new fancy cars that ARE better than it. It’s mine…

by Mub33b on Jun 28, 2011 11:53 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

More interesting = HOW would this trade look...

If you’re Danny and you have the chance to do this trade it has to be gut-wrenching to try and negotiate a lower price (potentially losing the deal altogether), but given that Rondo + filler is probably the most attractive replacement the Hornets would get in return for CP3 (except maybe an OKC westbrook package) do you think there’s a scenario in which the C’s can get CP3 WITHOUT:

A) including one of the big 3?
B) including Jeff Green?
C) including a 2012 first rounder?

For example:
Rondo + S&T Big Baby + 2013 first round pick for CP3 straight up?

Rondo + JO + Bradley for CP3?

Obviously both of those example deals would be great for the Celtics, but might be just enough for New Orleans to bite. I know I’m biased, but Rondo is a pretty damn good Chris Paul replacement at a very fair price… it’s hard to see New Orleans doing much better granted CP3 is no guarantee to re-sign

by milt palacio's shot on Jun 28, 2011 12:07 PM EDT reply actions  

That's my take on it.

I’m not averse to trading Rondo if it makes the team better. But you have to think carefully about just how much you are going to be giving up.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Poll question a bit misleading.

The wording of the poll question makes it tough to answer and maybe misleading. At first glance I see Rondo for Chris Paul and I think of course I would. But when it’s Rondo (and filler), the “(and filler)” makes it tough. Then rereading the article it says probably also Jeff Green and maybe also Ray Allen or Kevin Garnett. And now it’s a lot different from Rondo for Chris Paul.

by JohnnyRow on Jun 28, 2011 12:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Exactly.

People need to stop and think through what the whole ramifications would be.

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 6:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah...

I’ll keep Rondo. As has been mentioned, his game just keeps getting better, and he shows no signs of stopping. He’s a hard worker and continually striving to improve. Mark my words, his jumper will keep improving as well, to the point where it will be folly to sag off of him. I believe that he is a much more creative player than Paul, and I would give the “team-first” edge to Rondo as well. As he continues to build his skills, his accuracy, his jumper, and judgement when it comes to defending in the open court, I think that the deficiencies that some see in him when compared to Paul will be minimal at best, if nonexistent.

Plus, he’s ours. let’s go Rondo, and let’s go C’s!!!

by Hal Jordan on Jun 28, 2011 3:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Do you even know what team CP3 plays for?

Have you even seen him play? What the heck are you talking about? He is the ultimate team-first player. Before you bash someone who is either the #1 or #2 pg in the league (Rose being the other NOT Rondo), you should really watch a little film on him. Or at least look at his stat lines.

by RickyD Fan on Jun 28, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow...

I really can’t believe the level of homerism on this site today… I like our team and I’m a die-hard Celtics fan, but honestly, CP3 is a MUCH better basketball player than Rondo. If you take a step back, out of the green glow surrounding this city, and ask anyone (or just look at an position power poll), CP3 is a MUCH higher rated point guard. He has made scrub teammates look like all-stars. With an all-star line up, he would make the finals. This team could easily get back there with CP3 leading the game, because when the older shooters are having off-nights he can handle the scoring burden, and when they aren’t, he can make them look 25 years old again.

Secondly, a Rondo/Garnet trade for Paul/Okafor, with Garnett getting bought out and rejoining the Celtics, would be a huge win for this team. We would not only regain Garnett, but would get the efficient post presence of Okafor. While Okafor is not anything spectacular, he plays hard and can grab boards – which the Celtics need.

Paul is a fantastic passer, maybe the best in the game right now. Anyone who thinks otherwise hasn’t seen any footage of him playing. He has an extra gear that Rondo doesn’t, and has a wide variety of offensive weapons. He can protect the ball better, and makes better decisions.

If you check the position power polls outside of this site, I think you will see that most pundits have CP3 and Rose as the two best point guards (in some combo), and Rondo between 4-6 in the NBA – not higher. If you trade #5 for #1, and pick up inside rebounding through Okafor, I think you win the trade.

by RickyD Fan on Jun 28, 2011 4:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Rondo/Garnett for Paul/Okafor

That is a pretty iffy assumption that KG would get bought out and return. Granted, if it played out like that, that would indeed make the C’s pretty strong this year.

After this year, though, you just added a ton of salary on. Okafor is a 13M per year cap hit through 2013/2014. Paul makes ~7M more than Rondo and his contract hits our cap through 2012/2013.

That would put our total next summer at:

Okafor 13.5M
Pierce 16.7M
CP 17.8M
Green ~7.0M ? (assuming he will get extended)
Bradley 1.5M
Jajuan ~1.5M (guessing)
 ————————-
            58.0M

So much for signing any other big star.

Okafor. Ugh. This only works if we trade him. That is way too much money for him.

I really don’t give much of a hoot about position power polls.

So what if CP is ranked higher than Rondo? All that matters is how much better than Rondo he is. Is he so much better that he is worth killing our salary cap room by that much?

NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by mmmmm on Jun 28, 2011 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is very true, and very REAL...

CP3 I admit is better than Rondo…but NOT at their salary value, and skill wise, the only advantage CP has over Rondo is shooting FT…Yes, just the FT differential, on all accounts including jumpshots from 15 ft and beyond, CP3 is not by much better than RR. assist, rebounds and steals are a wash and defensively I trust Rondo better than CP3… so this CP3 > Rondo is just BS if you ask me.

"No I’m not KG. Not at all, but I’m Big Baby Glen Davis from LSU, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. I’m not the Big Ticket. I’m the Ticket Stub. Don’t count the Ticket Stub out. You might need the ticket to get in the game, but you leave with the ticket stub, because you’ll never forget this game."

by bopna on Jun 29, 2011 4:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chris Paul? Are you serious?

Chris Paul is only good on papers! Rondo is a proven champion with heart. If C’s will go for your moronic idea. then I’ll root for the Miami Heat fck the Cs

by David Bean on Jun 28, 2011 10:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Wouldn't trade Rondo for anyone

Rondo is not in his peak yet plus he is a true Celtic. We don’t to trade our best player, we just need to add youth and athleticism.

The way is see it, there's more than one way to win.

gie+Rondo4MVP

by RONDO4MVP on Jun 28, 2011 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Rondo > Paul

That’s all I have to say

by Juneauz on Jun 30, 2011 12:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Do ot ASAP!!

Rondo is overated, can shoot from the perimeter nor charity stripe, two big negatives for point guards. This could land us Howard in 2012. Danny has always liked CP3

Don’t bet the lakers aren’t after him, and howard, and would give up better players than Rondo, but not point guards, and they may not want to trade in conference

by XSV15 on Jul 3, 2011 10:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

CelticsBlog is a growing interactive community dedicated to providing fresh, comprehensive coverage of the Boston Celtics.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Why we can beat the heat
Mchale_small
Can the C's Cool Down the Heat?
Small
Fourth Quarter of Game 7: A Glimpse of the Future with Rondo?
Small
Is Rondo out of his mind? Or just on some other level?
Celticslogo_small
The All Idiot Team
Giflogocolorsmall_small
Just Like Old Times...
Images_small
What Philly Fans Are Saying
Ray_breaks_record_3_small
Last chance
Small
If this is it....
Small
Any Havlicek Signs in Martins Ferry, OH?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


CEO

Shamrock-blk-trans_small Jeff Clark

Authors/Editors

Hoosiers-dvdcover_small Roy_Hobbs

300h_small Wide Load

Big_4_small Jimmy Toscano

Leon_powe_small Green17

Ud_small Tom Bellinger

Grawful3_small Kiorrik

Authors/Mods

1_koolaid_avi_small FLCeltsFan

Po3_small Master Po

Images_small Bent

Green_avatar_small Fafnir

Small Tom Halzack

N23879518902_8484_small Jon Duke - CSL

Small jose3030

5bill_small Jack Jemsek

Small wjsy

Small Ryan Desmarais

250_small Brendan O'Hare

1119816_small JoshZavadil

Small TLayman

Small Anthony_Bruzzese

Small theoriginalhagrid

Sheed_small evansclinchy

Moderators

Photo_14_small Steve Weinman

Too_much_coffe_man_small Edgar

Small Chris72

Small thirstyboots18

Small CfanMissippi