Would Danny Ship Out The Captain?
Today, Adrian Wojnarowski poses some provocative questions about whether the Celtics should trade Paul Pierce:
Celtics headed for rebuild, maybe sooner than later - Adrian Wojnarowski - Yahoo! Sports
As Kevin Garnett and Allen become free agents this summer, money will peel away from the salary cap. Between then and now, the bigger question promises to be: Does ownership and general manager Danny Ainge go for the complete rebuild and trade Pierce before the March 15 deadline? Several contending teams have inquired about Pierce’s availability. As one Eastern Conference official said, there are "lots of calls asking if [Boston] will blow it up." . . .
Garnett and Allen come off the Celtics’ cap this summer, but Pierce is the most perplexing member of the Big Three. He has two years and $32 million left on his contract through the 2013-14 season, and moving him for a shorter deal could make the Celtics a huge player in free agency the next two years. As Boston officials contend, this is the reason they didn’t re-sign Perkins and Tony Allen to long-term contracts. They’ve been preparing for the time their core became too old, for the team’s need to start over.
To be more precise, if the Celtics traded Pierce (without taking back additional long-term salary) they could clear $16,790,345 from next season's cap, and as much as $15,333,334 the following year. Without Pierce next season, the team could have realistically as much as $40 - $45 million in cap room, depending on things like rookie salaries, how much the cap fluctuates, etc. That's enough for at least two max contract guys to pair with Rondo. Or, the team could sign-and-trade Rondo, and do a fresh rebuild with three or more major free agents.
(more after the poll and break)
In addition to the cap flexibility, Pierce probably has some trade value around the league. He had an excellent season last year -- his best season ever in terms of efficiency -- and he's showing signs of life this year after a start that has been marred by injuries. It's likely that Pierce could bring us back a draft pick or two, and maybe a young guy with some potential. By trading Pierce, the idea would be to jump start rebuilding. Danny Ainge has repeatedly lamented Red's refusal to trade Larry Bird and Kevin McHale for sentimental reasons, and this could be Danny's chance to undo what Red did. He's already tried to trade Pierce at least once (in order to draft Chris Paul); perhaps Danny would be inclined to do so again.
At the same time, there's something to be said for allowing Paul Pierce to remain a career Celtic. Look at the leader board of all-time Celtics statistics: Pierce is top-seven all-time in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks. He's on the cusp of passing the legend Larry Bird for second all-time in Celtics scoring. He led the team to a championship after a long drought, and has been the face of the franchise for 14 seasons now. The Celtics are a franchise that have traditionally rewarded loyalty and have preferred to keep players part of the family. On a visceral level, trading Pierce would hurt badly. That's without even getting into arguments regarding whether Pierce and the rest of the core can lead a deep playoff run.
So, where do you stand? If a team makes a legit offer for Pierce (say, an expiring contract, a young player with some upside, and a #1 pick) do you pull the trigger? Or are you disinclined to trade Pierce under any circumstances?
293 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Read about this on yahoo
I think after last night’s loss many in media are starting to speak out more about this team’s struggles. Today at work I read so many article on Boston’s current struggles. People aren’t sure what the problem is with the Celtics? Age, injuries or out of shape?
I hope that this current team can get it together sooner than later because it’s painful to watch them play at this moment.
It all depends on what the offer is
It would have to be really good deal to give up a lifer in Pierce, one of only 4 current players who have played more than 10 seasons with the same team.
If we can get Dwight Howard in return
That will bring the springs back on KG’s knees.
by KingCeltics on Jan 17, 2012 6:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Riiiight
Only if we take Big Baby back and send them Rondo with Pierce and maybe even Ray.
simul justus et peccator
I agree - only do it if it clearly gets the C's closer to another title
As a fan I would strongly prefer to see Pierce retire in green. I’d like him to be there through the transition of the next couple of years and show the next generation the Celtics way. Though I would say that the Celtic legacies of Parish, Cowens, and Cousy were not hurt by them ending their careers in another uniform.
That said, anyone should be tradeable if it clearly makes the team better. I just have a hard time seeing how that happens. Is anyone really going to trade a franchise cornerstone or high lottery pick for Pierce? And if they clear cap space is there a reasonable scenario where they can use the extra space to acquire a cornerstone player?
Other factors to consider:
- How does it affect the locker room? Does Doc sign off on this? How does it affect Rondo’s feelings about the team going forward?
- How does it affect the chance of good players coming to Boston in the future? If Pierce is upset, feels betrayed and talks about it in the media it could hurt the Celtics reputation.
- How would fans react? Think it would hurt ticket sales, fan interest, ad revenue? Is ownership OK with what would happen?
by NHSportsFan on Jan 17, 2012 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
How does it affect Rondo?
That depends. If the Cs attract two max contract players alongside him next year, I think he’ll be just fine with it.
franchise player no more its all about making the team better and its all about business.
why care about rondo’s feelings if he cant improve his jumpshots his a trade bait also.
by reb0undwins18 on Jan 17, 2012 11:42 PM EST up reply actions
Any player can and should be traded for the right deal
Keeping anyone for “sentimental” reasons is nuts. Should be grounds for dismissal.
But there are two things I’d like to see go away:
- Puns on the word “Truth”…. should be limited to no more than 1 per day.
- “That said”, “having said that”, “that being said”, blablabla
Thanks for your constructive comment, I guess...
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
+1
Jesus Shuttlesworth: I hate my name. What kind of name is Jesus anyway?
Jake Shuttlesworth: It's biblical.
Jesus Shuttlesworth: Yeah, no kidding.
by jakeshuttlesworth on Jan 17, 2012 7:25 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
"Keeping anyone for "sentimental" reasons "
Well, don’t forget that this ultimately is an entertainment business.
And sentiment is part of the entertainment product that they are selling.
It has to be weighed appropriately. Not given in to. Not ignored. It’s just part of the product.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
do it asap. this team is done. trade everyone. even if they get it together its a first round playoff loss.
Watch out for us in the playoffs?
Maybe in the wheelchair basketball league. In the NBA, though, not so much.
Don't knock the wheelchair basketball league.
They can ball.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
People said the same thing in 2010...
This team looks even worse right now, but fans have counted this team out before and have been wrong.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
People said the same thing in 2010-2011...
and look how that turned out. We were destroyed in the second round, never even made it to the conference finals.
The big three are a year older, we’re still Perkless, and no better off the bench. And our competitors all got better. By no stretch of the imagination is this team, as presently constituted, a threat to make the finals.
Ahh ... the magic of predictions
if you predict that your car will fall apart while driving it each day, and then drive it each day, eventually, you will be right!
It may indeed be time for the ‘car’ to fall apart. Roy has a valid point though – there is a certain faction that has been predicting that imminent collapse constantly for several years now.
As to what happened in particular in 2010-2011 – it wasn’t the Big 3 that finally ran aground. The team around them collapsed under the weight of too many injuries.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Consider me sentimentally nuts
I would be sad if PP was traded. He was my first “favorite” basketball player. Rondo was my second.
That said:
What about Pierce to Orlando for Turkoglu, Ryan Anderson (RFA this year) and as many picks (preferably unprotected) as they’re willing to give us? Then we amnesty Turkoglu (Orlando can’t amnesty Turkoglu because they already amnestied Arenas, which is why the deal makes nominal sense for them.)
We can't amnesty players we trade for...
… so we’d be stuck with Turk’s contract.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
Really?
Man this CBA gets more and more confusing. I knew the rule was you can only amnesty players signed in the last CBA, and only once for this CBA, but I didn’t know you couldn’t trade and then amnesty.
I no longer like my proposal as much.
by egotistical ma on Jan 17, 2012 6:04 PM EST up reply actions
Proceed with caution...
I hope the C’s take a deep breath, let this season play out just a bit longer to see if its a lost cause for sure before they move Pierce or any other members of the big 3 or 4.
Unless a great deal come by Ainges way where he can get maybe get a young talent in return (which would be tough, but maybe possible in a multi team trade scenario) who could possibly help the C’s this year, waiting until around the trade deadline I think would be a fair strategy to allow the core one last shot to redeem themselves.
But with Ainge you never know if and when he will make a move so with the rumors starting the upcoming weeks and months should be very interesting to see unfold, especially if the C’s can not get there act together.
+1
Agree! I just hope the Celtics can pull of a run starting tomorrow into next month to ease the frustration of fans and media.
i agree
im a bit sentimental on this. although from the manager’s stand point. we need to look 2-3 yrs ahead. i dont want to see the C’s back to being a mediocre team it was in the 90’s.
Paul Pierce, no matter what is making $32 MILLION over the next two years.......
don’t feel tooo bad for him wherever he is, even if it’s with a cellar dweller, which it won’t be.
This organization has given as much to him as he has to it…moreso, actually….time for him to give a little more by helping our rebuild, hopefilly on the fly.
We may have thought of trading him for the pick that was CP3, but he was also ready to bolt if Danny didn’t get Ray.
It’s business.
it's darn hard to find a true leader to a team
and for Boston Celtics that is #34 Paul Pierce. Mere talent alone cannot win a championship (see Miami Heat). We still need him to lead the team that will be loaded with talent next season, even not as a scoring option but as a veteran instigator.
Pateince
Just don’t see a team with trade assets (Utah/Indy/Minn) or a contender giving back equal value. Nothing more than a low first rounder and bad contract lasting more than a year is not enough. Let’s wait and see if they can break through and develop a rythum.
Paul Pierce is a Celtic.
The day Paul Pierce is traded for a one year advance in cap space and picks is a sad day for the Boston Celtics family. We are already in an excellent position to rebuild with him on board, he is a proven vet that can help with the transition, and his salary will come off the books at a reasonable time during that process. Unless there is a lopsided deal to be made, he should remain where he belongs.
If it happens, my entire world changes.
At that point I’d have to consider that I am a fan more of laundry or logos than the men who have represented the team I love.
The Celtics are not just a basketball team, they are a way of life.
These are the words of the immortal Red Auerbach. Paul has embodied that way of life his entire career, he may be LA born, but he’s become one of our own. I cannot stomach seeing him in another uniform, and nothing I feel for the Celtics will ever be the same if Danny does this.
I don’t care if it extends our rebuilding window a couple years, Pierce should retired a Celtic. End of story.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
The day they trade him ...the day I stop being a Celtic fan spanning over 40 years....mark my words
Is it Soup Yet?
I'm not sure I could ever stop being a fan.
But I’d have a very hard time looking at things the same ever again.
The Perk trade was one thing, this is a whole different story…
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
Don't let the door kick you in the behind guys!
Russell and Bird themselves went on to lead other organizations. Its not the same as being traded, but some of being a fan is about the organization itself and faith that although there will be missteps along the way, what Red built will never dim so much as to go away completely
wahz....you're entitled to your opinion but I don't like being told to let the door hit me on the way out as if I just got here
Is it Soup Yet?
i didn't just get here either...and guess what? You aren't even being honest with yourself. you got to meet and talk with Russ and I didn't
you will stop being a fan? No you won’t, Po. So settle down. We might be screwed up for awhile but a team will form worth rooting for again
No, Danny....
Please DON’T ship The Captain out.
It has been a rough stretch for sure, but we’ll turn this around.
SS & R Ultimate Draft 2011:
C - David "The Admiral" Robinson / Arvydas Sabonis
PF - Kevin "Big Ticket" Garnett / Dave Cowens
SF - Tracy McGrady / Eddie Jones
SG - Paul "The Truth" Pierce / Reggie Lewis
PG - Bob "Hardwood Houdini" Cousy / Maurice "Mo" Cheeks
If Danny trades The Truth then that just proves to me he’s an idiot and just got lucky with the Allen and KG deal. This a guy who severed ties to LA just because he love Boston so much. SMH.
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 6:10 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I don't get it.
When KG was traded out of Minnesota, he’d played there 12 years. As long as Pierce in Boston. To a lot of Minnesotans he was the face of the franchise. Why was it alright for us to take Garnett, and look on him as the face of our franchise, if it would be wrong for Pierce to go somewhere else?
Also, how do you know what Pierce wants? Maybe he’d rather be on a contender.
I think Pierce would prefer to go out swinging with the Big 3.
To whatever end that is. Even if it means missing the playoffs.
I don’t think that would ever happen, as bad as this team has looked, it’s been against really good opponents. They’re still going to be good enough to beat the bad teams and get into the playoffs.
Then again, I’m just guessing. Far as the Garnett thing, it’s exactly the same, and I bet a lot of die hard Wolves fans had this same argument we’re having in this thread right now.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
I think KG leaving Minnesota to come here
created similar fan sentiments to Ray Bourke going from here to Colorado. Each left a perpetually frustrating situation to go finally get a chance at a title. And I think a lot of their original fans were glad for them to do so. Not all fans, of course. But a lot.
I’m not sure if Pierce were traded at this point that that would be viewed in the same way.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
We need a leader
And Paul Pierce #34 is the best leader we ever had, and we can thank to him for many things. He deserves to retire in Green, and none other.
If than idiot of a GM trades him, I’m done.
I don't follow rules, I let the rules follow me.
Celtics organization should take a wait and see approach.
Regardless of this team’s recent struggles give them a few more games to get things together. You don’t trade Paul Pierce, the captain of the Celtics for 13 years. I could be wrong, but I think the Celtics will improve their play.
Danny won't be as stupid as Dumars
Or NJ and NY for that matter when it comes to incoming bad contracts (Gordon/Villaneua)
For the right price
I would definitely do it. And for all of those that say that they’ll stop being fans…I’ll believe it when I see it.
As soon as the Celtics start winning again…they’ll be back like little Fan Boys!
tru that..its all talk
if they got a good deal out of it, then im all for it…why jeopardize winning, when thats all a gm needs to worry about is keeping this ship from sinking
Yes yes yes
But depends on what we’re gettin back though. I still want us to be contenders this season so why dont we get a nice athletic sf who can create his own shot. Oh and while he’s at it, ship KG too
by celtz_believer on Jan 17, 2012 6:20 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Yes.
GM’s that fall for that sentimental bs should be fired. If you get a good deal for Pierce you do it. Remember its a BUSINESS. Bring him back in two years so he can eclipse Larry Bird. Trade Rondo for a lottery pick and do a full blown total rebuild. Under no circumstances is this team winning a title this year. The only way next year to “possibly” win a title, is if you sign two free agents and resign KG and Allen to one year deals and bring back Pierce, Bass, and Jeff Green. Those are the two options. If Pierce was traded, could you imagine the rumors for the next two years??? With $45mil in space, they’d be attached to EVERY single rumor involving sign and trades and free agent signings. The main problem with the cap space, is every franchise player save for Dwight Howard is locked up….Lebron, Paul, Kobe, Durant, Wade, Dirk, etc.
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:22 PM EST reply actions
Are these REAL celtic fans?
Wow after banner 17 all of you want to ship the big 3 outta here huh? Just remember the law of karma.
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 6:23 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Hey im a realist
I appreciate the big 3 for making it special during banner 17 year but hey we knew it was going to be over at one point.. Dont tell me that you think this team as it is will even make the playoffs. That’s what you want to believe. Lets just suck it up and realize we have no team for the next 4,5 years.
by celtz_believer on Jan 17, 2012 6:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
They will make the playoffs.
Not even a question about it, at some point this team is going to start playing better. They’ll run off a nice streak of 6 or 7 games, beat enough of the bad teams over the long haul to get in at a 6 or 7 seed.
I guarantee it.
Not saying they have enough left to do anything in the playoffs though, I still think they’re capable, but a lot of things have to go right between now and then.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
Two quick questions
1 – I can’t think of anyone who the Celtics could realistically trade Pierce for this season that would be actually worth trading him for. Any thoughts?
2 – For the 2012 free agent class: Chris Paul is off the table and the Celtics do not seem to be on the radar for Dwight Howard. Even though the Magic are winning now, it doesn’t seem like Howard will resign so he will probably be dealt somewhere this season. Outside of Kevin Love, what remaining free agents are left that would be worth rebuilding around?
Lessee .... there's ... Kevin Love and ..... Kevin Love.
And don’t forget about Mr. Love.
…
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Sorry ... fantasies getting in my head again.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
yes, were Celtic fans...
and we dont want to be in the lottery for 4 years. They got their title, made MILLIONS of dollars, its a business. If the guy that mows your lawn keeps missing spots and doing a bad job, are you going to keep him on your payroll? You’re going to get a better lawn mowerer (?) If Pierce gets you 2 firsts, you do it.
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:26 PM EST reply actions

Right now they may be struggling, but let’s not forget we’ve been down this road in 2010. Later during the 2010 season the Celtics pulled it together and made it to the finals. Obviously this team is different. Perkins, Allen, Davis, West and Shaq are all gone, the Celtics core are older.
Before or after the 2012 the Celtics could have a totally look. I do believe once Garnett, Allen and Pierce move I don’t see the Celtics being relevant for a while. It’s going to be hard to replace Garnett, Allen and Pierce because they were special talents.
Law of Karma?
Doesn’t exist…if it did then after the deaths of Bias and Lewis the Celtics would have gotten two great players to replace them. It didn’t happen.
Ray Allen and Kevin GArnett.
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 6:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
How did they get them?
Through trades! Decades later!!
Business is business! If there’s a good deal, I want Danny to deal anybody he has.
We werent talking trades buddy. You were asking for two players right? We were talking about tge law of karma remember?
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 6:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
So many other factors to consider.
Like the gross mis-management of the team by Chris Wallace, Rick Pitino, and a management team that pinched pennies.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
As a fan I'd rather see PP stay no matter what
I’m more a fan of the men inside the uniform
than the uniform itself
Whats Pierce worth??
Heres a better question…whats an NBA championship worth? Because Pierce could put a team over the top. Please Danny dont not trade Pierce because of the sentimental stuff, if teams are calling that means he has value…whats not to like about that?
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:31 PM EST reply actions
Most likely Pierce destinations...
1. Clippers 2. Orlando 3. Memphis 4. OKC. 5. Denver. 6. Houston I cant see why any other team would want him.
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:34 PM EST reply actions
I could really see a Denver trade
With us shipping out Pierce, Garnett, JO and a draft pick for Galinari, Nene, Kenneth Farried and Jordan Hamilton
"Victory belongs to the most Preserving" - Napoleon
by RotB_MattR on Jan 17, 2012 10:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
IF, IF, IF it came down to it...
What kind of package would be attractive to you all from the Wolves? As a Wolves fan who began following the Celtics when Ray and KG came over, I know how much the Truth would change the Wolves into winners. Anything around Derrick Williams (Who is stuck behind Kevin Love) that is enticing? Obviously Rubio and Love wouldn’t be traded so what else would make sense in rebuilding a team around Rondo? Like Rubio, it’s about athletes (Rubio is making Anthony Randolph look much better than he is) I assume.
Thoughts? What else in addition to D Williams?
Pierce to the Blazers
PP, OJ and Bradley for Wes Matthews, Nicolas Batum and Camby………..
It wont happen
Trading away Pierce is like trading away Larry Bird, or Bill Russel.
Hes a celtic legend, and as such he wont be traded.
He gave alot to the team and will continue to give it his all.
Plus Pierce stated from before, if he wants to play for another team it will be a European team since he and his family would like to travel and explore other countries.
From Minny??
a…Beasley for sure, Darko, and a first probably gets it done. I think Beasley is very underused. He always seems to burn the Cletics.
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:36 PM EST reply actions
Get the heck out of here.
No way I’d take Beasley, not a chance.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
From Minny...
and that 1st has to be unprotected.
by Sarcazmo's Funhouse on Jan 17, 2012 6:37 PM EST reply actions
I think Minny
Traded their first to the Clippers who traded it to New Orleans as part of the Paul trade. Maybe a deal with NO for the Wolves 1st round pick but other than that we can only trade him to contending teams so we would only get a late first round pick or a good young guy with potential. The only reason why we would trade him for almost nothing is to clear cap space.
Correct...
But we have Derrick Williams! Stuck behind Love, he’s a great start to a package for Pierce.
I might go for that
but there has to be other stuff to make the $s work. I still don’t know why the Wolves took Derrick.
simul justus et peccator
You're not the only one confused there...
Well, what else? I guess it depends on what the C’s get for Ray and/or KG I think.
It's a business...
Unfortunately. I miss the times when Red was still around. When the term “franchise player” meant loyalty and was something you could see throughout the league. The term, although still written through many sports articles, doesn’t mean that much anymore. You can hardly see an All-Star spend his whole career in one club.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Danny Ainge pulls the trigger on the team’s main players to start rebuilding. The times are different. Today it’s much more a business than in the Bird era. And even more than in the Bill Russell era. The GMs and owners want results, want teams that sell tickets, and players that help hang banners. Simple as that. Do I agree with that? Not totally. I understand it, though.
But I also understand what being a Celtic is like. The green that flows through our hearts is all about tradition, loyalty, and the romanticism of our idols forever wearing the Celtic pride. Even when they’re done playing or gone to another team, they will be forever true to the feeling of playing in Boston. Last night was an example of that. Not only were the fans still loyal to Perk, but as he said in his own words, he still has a green heart.
I would love to see the Captain retire a Celtic. I’m pretty sure everyone would.
Loyalty
What’s that …… besides PP and Rondo who are true Celtics and both picks.
lets see..
dump PP and cry about losing a big clod like perkins. Now thats loyalty!
Give PP some time.
We all know that this team isn’t gonna win a title with this roster I personally think we should keep ray and pierce for this whole season and trade rondo for Williams but I rather trade rondo for John wall and McGhee to rebuild around wall and trade kg for a young talented star and trade jermaine and Bradley and Wilcox together for some young players who can shoot and run the ball or might as well Top picks and see how it goes from there and hopefully Dwight comes here to Boston and play with wall for a contending team. Plus seeing a legend on my era would really hurt all the celtics fans I really want him to end it and retire as a celtics no doubt I would really hate to see him go.
I would love to see that lazy bum go. If he cared about the team, he would have stayed in shape instead of layin back and playing poker. He’s the reason why we’re rock bottom in the standings.
by celtz_believer on Jan 17, 2012 6:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Now he's a lazy bum?
I’ve seen it all from some Celtics on here. I guess it’s true about some Celts fans. When things so wrong you jump ship or bandwagon right away.
Please be careful labeling and criticizing other fans...
But I agree. “Lazy bum” seems a little harsh for a guy who won Finals MVP and who has come through in the clutch time and time again.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
I am sorry if my comment was hurtful to others. Its just frustrating i put on that Celtic jersey and walk around East Los Angeles a couple times a month. And its sad that I have a harder time with other Celtic fans rather than hardcore laker fans. It just baffles me that laker fans have more respect for our players than our fans.
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 7:03 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
+1
Some fans are different than others I guess.
Thank you. I was thinking that cos it got deleted.
by The green mamba on Jan 17, 2012 7:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
V
Yes but he doesnt care anymore.. Je should have taken care of his body like Ray always does. But unfortunately Ray isnt great anymore so it hurts us more that our best player was careless
by celtz_believer on Jan 17, 2012 7:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
short sighted to say the least
We’re rock bottom because he was hurt, KG needs more oil (reminds me of DJ’s last few years), we have 1 legit, sort of, center, and a whole host of other issues.
The reason Pierce is being discussed is he’s the only one another team wants! If he was a lazy bum, no one would be inquiring.
“Hey, who’s your laziest player? I want that guy!”
simul justus et peccator
Ray is probably even more valuable.
If Danny really is looking to blow it up.
You can never have too many shooters on a team, Ray Allen can help any team in the NBA, without question, and he has an expiring deal.
"Phil is obviously a good coach. You don't win that many games without being a damn good coach, ... Remember one thing: He's been very fortunate. He picks his spots. That's all I can say." - Red Auerbach
Good maybe these guy's can open their eyes Outta shape
Someone saw that too
PP
What’s he’s pay roll and he’s outta shape, who fault
There something to be said to letting the Core 4 play it out.
It’s been real hard to watch how this season has played out so far, but I feel like thus whole group should have the oppurtunity to right the ship and play it out. The time is coming to move on from this group, but we’re only 12 games in and I feel like they have earned the right to fix this situation. Without question there is more heart than brain in this reponse.
Danny would trade...
Danny would trade his momma, his grandma, his daughter and his dog! Trust me, if he sees a deal in which Pierce is wanted he’ll drop him in a second! No respect for tradition!
I will ALWAYS cheer for the name on the front more than the name on the back
However, please don’t do this, Danny, not under any circumstances. Allow Pierce to retire a Celtic like he deserves. I still have hopes that, given time, this team will get back on track and surprise some people
What if
Pierce doesn’t want to lose. I’m sure some time soon Pierce and Danny will have that talk, “do you want to hand around and hope we can acquire some talent next year so we can contend once again and you can retire a Celtic or if the opportunity arises would you like to be traded to a contender?” If this proposition was made to you as a player what would you do?
Stay with the team you love and have been playing for your whole career but at the same time you have an inkling your last 3 seasons will be miserable loosing ones? Or – Move to a contender where you can actually compete for championships for you final 3 seasons?
I think he pretty much made this decision when he re-signed for 4 years
He had to know then it wasn’t gonna last forever. He has said he wants to retire a Celtic. IF he were to give his blessing on a trade, then my feelings would change. I just want to see some loyalty to him and don’t want to see the rug pulled out from under him!
just throwin' it out there
pierce for big al works on the trade checker…
just sayin’
It's about Championships
The time is here, let’s be truthful, something needs to done and very soon.
We could start dissecting this
Which teams (in theory) would be interested in him and what do they have to offer us thats worth giving up the face of the franchise?
Bulls: Not much
Magic: Not much
Lakers: Nothing
Spurs: Not Much
Clippers: They may have something but are probably unwilling to trade it
OKC: Same as the Clippers, may not want to give up the right pieces.
If Pierce gets traded it will be solely for salary dump / tanking (high draft) purposes.
Mind you though, if this happens we have the opportunity to sign a couple of max contracts in the offseason + another good player and still keep Rondo or trade him for something good. But will the big free agents want to sign with us? If not then trading Pierce will be a wasted exercise.
Forgetting Dallas?
again, not much, but I think they make sense at the moment for a couple different reasons.
I'm probably forgetting a few teams that would be interested.
I suppose we could trade him for Odom and Carter. I’ve seen Carter play and he’s a scoring machine! I have been in a coma for the last 8 years though but I bet he’s still awesome right?
Carter wouldn’t be able to guard a brick wall. When he actually tries, he’s really good. He just doesn’t care enough. No way I want him on the Celtics.
"Can't eat sushi in Utah, brother. Landlocked."
by IsItTheShoes on Jan 18, 2012 2:13 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Only scenario in which Danny trades Pierce is getting a top 5 draft pick in return
But who’s going to give up a top 5 pick that is a contender this year and would take on 32 million ?
Pierce ain’t going anywhere.
Ray Allen on the other hand….
Would Danny Ship Out The Captain?
I don’t see what sense it makes to trade Paul Pierce at this stage. He’s a Celtics and should retire a Celtic. Eventually Ainge will have to get younger and that is likely to happen at the end of the 2012 season.
Right now the Celtics are struggling. Age, fatigue, lack of athleticism, defense and other flaws are hurting this team. I have this strange feeling that things can turn around sooner than later. Maybe that’s just me.
Expiring contract, young player &a number 1? I’d have to sorry, regardless it isn’t like he wont have his # retired
by stylo617617 on Jan 17, 2012 7:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions
-_-
Danny ainge reminds me of the movie moneyball…….
What can Danny get for PP, RA and KG?
Let’s be realistic folks. I’m reading some comments and trade ideas, but shaking my head in the process. I agree that the 4-8 record is a major concern at this point and fans, media are trying to figure what could be the cause.
The Celtics starters are not getting younger, but older and they’re clearly losing the capabilities they once had. It’s apart of being an aging athlete you just can’t cheat father time. Though I still believe it’s early enough to change things for the better.
It’s like what Jalen Rose, Skip Bayless, Mike Fertello, Shaq, Kenny Smith, Barkley are saying hope the Celtics improve and just grind it out until the post-season.
Have to agree
People are posting bad trades for the Celtics, or ridiculously unrealistic trades like getting Dwight Howard for expiring contracts (newsflash orlando doesn’t want to dump D12 for nothing). KG and Ray are expiring contracts and teams aren’t going to gut their rosters for players that can no longer play 35+ minutes effectively. Pierce has a no trade clause, and may want to stay a Celtic till the end. A trade is not impossible just unlikely.
Just read below that Pierce may not have a no trade clause
If that is true, that changes everything.
Pierce has a no trade clause.
So, end of the story, guys.
Which he can waive...
but I don’t believe he would unless it was to a team that would allow him to contend for a championship in his last few years.
by chicagomaroon on Jan 17, 2012 7:27 PM EST up reply actions
A no trade clause
Means that he would have to agree to any trade before its done. Personally I think Pierce would welcome the opportunity to got to say… the Bulls or OKC rather than stay on a sinking ship. There is such a thing as loyalty but even Michael Jordan was looking to sign with the Knicks and team up with Ewing for the 98-99 season before the lockout. Not saying he’ll agree to a trade but who wants to spend the twilight of their career on a rebuilding team? Granted Ainge may pull off some good trades and signings in the offseason because we have a lot of cap space and make the Celtics a contender once again but its not a given, where getting traded to a contender is.
PP won't waive his no trade clause
Because he still got a ring and wants to retire as a celtic.
Paul Pierce's legacy in Boston
Pierce has also been the face of the Celtics through bad years and good and has said he wants to be remembered as one of the greatest Celtics of all time. He’s lived in the area for years and has a wife and kids in school here. I’m doubtful that Pierce is so hungry for another title that he would gladly get up and move to Oklahoma City or Chicago if he had his choice. I feel like at this point in his career his own legacy in Boston is worth more to him than the chance to win another title elsewhere playing a secondary role for another team.
Does he for sure?
That’s great then! It’s his decision.
Do you have a source about this no trade clause?
They don’t mention it on realgm.com.
Why not!?
If it makes us into a contender again I’d sell my soul. Can we not trade Danny Ainge instead though?
For the Good of the team's future and Paul Pierce
Pierce Jersey # should eventually be hung from the rafters at the Garden. that much is sure. He should be afforded the opportunity to continue to compete at a higher level On another team- than we can provide. he spent too many years building and rebuilding already and should not be dragged through another at this stage of his career. Too, we need to move on and blow this thing up and trading Paul Pierce is our best and biggest asset thus bringing us the best deal. It would be a big deal for both of us. Trade him soon.
by Moses Freeman Jr. on Jan 17, 2012 7:32 PM EST reply actions
Sort of like the free Steve Nash thing
Thats another guy that deserves better
Nash is in a FAR worse situation than Pierce. He legitimately needs to be traded immediately, for his sake. I’d bet my house that we’ll make the playoffs and Phoenix won’t.
"Can't eat sushi in Utah, brother. Landlocked."
by IsItTheShoes on Jan 18, 2012 2:15 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
now thats funny
hahaha seriously !!
i said it before , we will make the playoffs. probably 7-8th seed.
Teams already have their star players locked up. Once Garnett, Pierce and Allen are gone Boston will be more difficult to attract top players. There’s not that much talent left in the league that can make the Celtics contenders once the Big 3 are gone.
Other contending teams are not going to let their star players go. Chris Paul doesn’t want to be in Boston. David West doesn’t not want to be in Boston. Lebron, Wade and Bosh are locked in Miami. Portland Trailblazers are not letting LaMarcus Aldridge go anywhere. Grizzles are not letting Rudy Gay or OJ Mayo go anywhere. Timberwolves will likely offer Kevin Love a lot of money. The Thunder will likely offer Westbrook a lot of money. Dwight Howard wants to play in LA, NJ or Dal. Lakers would never deal Gasol and Bynum to Boston. Melo, A’mare and Chandler are locked in NY. Hornets want nothing to do with Rondo. Bulls would never deal Rose, Dang, Boozer and Noah to the Celtics. The Warriors are not trading Curry, Lee or Ellis to the Celtics.
So unless you guys want mediocre players from non-contending teams be my guest trade Paul, Kevin and Ray. lol
PP, KG and RA are becoming mediocre players
Do you think this big 3 is still contening for a title? Wake up!
You have a point about the bigs names beoing locked up in their respective teams, however nobody here thinks that a PP trade would land us a star player. What this team needs is young players / picks / cap flexibility.
What are you trying to say?
by bbeingphilled on Jan 17, 2012 8:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If we can get a good package, absolutely
I love Pierce, but to be this sentimental about him is crazy. I’m a Celtics fan above everything else, and if we have an option to reload by trading Pierce, then go for it. I’m a bit more optimistic about this season than most (I think once the old guys get their legs under them, a lot of these open shots will start falling), so I see no reason to rush this. However, if we’re still struggling (or not), and somebody offers a ton for Pierce (picks, young studs, cap space – not just one of the three, though), we should pull the trigger. This doesn’t mean trading Pierce for peanuts. He could be a huge help to any contending team, especially once he gets back in shape. I’m not sure anybody would offer an awesome package, but if they do, yeah, do it. We’re almost certainly not winning the title this year, and would then have enough cap room to get 2 max contract guys and have some extra picks (presumably) or young players we get for him in return. This would be the quickest way to reload.
Loyalty Is Dead
I just threw up in my mouth at this suggestion to even consider trading Pierce. Disgusted.
by paul7x5x on Jan 17, 2012 7:47 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Ainge isnt above trading anyone...
That said, Pierce is a fan & Wyc favorite. They’d have to get REAL value back for him, not just expiring contracts and picks.
I still say this team can turn it around. Let’s see what happens in the next 10 games or so…
Yes,
Send him to a contender and let him get one more title before he retires. I don’t see how making him stay on a rebuilding team is some false sense of “loyalty.”
It was inevitable, but unfortunately came one year and one title before we expected it. The time to rebuild is now before we play our way out of a top 10 pick in a loaded draft.
My Twitter @totheights
It's not like they're making him stay
He made that decision himself when he signed his last long-term contract, in my opinion.
Yeah, he signed when he, like all of us, expected a year or two more of competing with the Big 3
This team needs to be blown up. So if we start trading guys to start a rebuild it is ridiculous and IMO disrespectful to Paul who has earned the right to play for a winner at this point in his career than to lead some awful rebuilding team.
My Twitter @totheights
Depends
However, im a fan of pierce but if he is sucking we cant not trade him for loyalty reasons. Danny needs to make this team contenders. Anyone that is not doing their job is capable to going bye bye. ANYONE. The way our guys take nights off, no excuse for that. Carry your weight or u might not be around. Im not against any trade for anyone, as long as the celtics get better. A way for pierce or whoever to assure that they stay celtics: do your job and night in and night out leave it all on the court
by Kgwillkillyou on Jan 17, 2012 8:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions
What's that Ainge quote about looking around the Celtic locker room
And saying if he was the GM, these guys would be going…
The game's I've seen
Pierce has been a step slow and he’s lost a little of his hops.
Is that lack of training/conditioning (Not knocking him b/c of the injury)
or is it a sign of age?
I dunno, but the general rule of thumb is to trade an asset too early rather than too late.
My sentiment says keep him, but the business side of me says make a good trade now.
Good trade mentioned in the forums was: Batum+Camby for Pierce
Blazers probably make this deal to be serious contenders. Although I’d rather Batum plus some kind of pick.
Clears cap space and gets a young horse to run with Rondo and play the 3 spot.
If Green comes back I wonder if they Move Batum to the 2 guard spot?
We could also use Green in a trade if needed.
After everything Pierce has done for us though, I want him sitting at every C’s game in the front row and in all the championship photos, hanging around the gym a la Bill Russell.
Heart>head.
So make them add their 1st and add like a 2nd and cash from our side.
It would be a great deal.
My Twitter @totheights
I'd be heartbroken.
"There's no place like it, and it's ours." - Stephen King on Fenway Park
by 808BostonSportsFan on Jan 17, 2012 8:27 PM EST reply actions
that would kill me to see Paul go
let’s be honest, the chances of us attracting two max guys is slim to none. despite the culture and such, Boston is not a prime destination like New York, Chicago, and LA. the money coming off the books with Ray and KG’s expiring contracts is enough to sign a big piece for the future while still retaining Paul anyways.
That is exactly why we need a lottery pick.
Not a low playoff seed and an early exit.
My Twitter @totheights
I would trade them....
I would definitely trade Pierce, Garnett and Allen. I’m sure there’s a lot of contenders looking for capable hall of fame veterans. I would trade those 3 to contenders to try and make those contend for a title.(sarcasm)
I’m sure teams like Miami, Chicago, LA, Denver, Portland, New York, Oklahoma are licking their chops or ringing Ainge to snatch Garnett, Pierce and Allen.
This is me, fence-sitting (again)
So my heart says keep Pierce — who I FINALLY warmed up to after the Allen and Garnett came on board, and he showed the leadership I’d always wanted — but my head says trade him. As much as it pains me, i say pull the trigger but only if it’s the right deal. But frankly I LOVE that he has the no-trade clause, and surely wouldn’t hold it against him if he exercised it if he felt he was getting a raw deal. For perspective, I was against the Big Al trade way back when because I liked the core Ainge had built and felt like he was mortgaging our future for the shot at ONE title at most, and then we’d be in big trouble. Well, Ainge is positioning us to have a future. You have to respect that.
No way
Pierce will retire as a Celtic. Grousbeck won’t do sign off on it.
I don't see it happening but wouldn't be surprised
Are we getting a lottery pick back for Pierce? Or a potential all-star? I don’t think so. I’m sure Danny will pick up the phone, listen and politely say, no thanks. Otherwise I don’t see the point. Tanking is a trap, and what’s the point of trading Pierce when you’re not going to get a better player? A low draft pick? Maybe that’s his market value for all I know, but I don’t think that’s nearly enough value to the Celtics for PP. We’re already going to have a lot of cap space. Also keep in mind Pierce’s last year is only guaranteed for $4-5M. So I’m failing to see how we get back value to make it worthwhile.
I think Ray and KG have declined to the point where it would be more plausible for one of them to get traded. Ray is probably more likely to get traded just because he is shooting incredibly well (although not doing much else by my eyes). KG’s contract is huge and his play so visibly degraded from past years, it’s hard to even come up with a plausible, CBA-workable scenario.
Lastly I’d add, we should be ready for anything (including Rondo being dealt) if this team hasn’t turned it around by Feb. 15. At that point 28 games will be in the books and 19 of them will have been home games. Not much reason to think it will get better on the road.
every time I'm SURE something won't happen, it gets rumored
I was sure Perkins wasn’t going to get traded
I was sure that Rondo was our building block for the future
and I was sure that Pierce would never come up in rumors
the moral of the story, don’t listen to me, I know nothing LOL
Faith and Sports - an essay by Jeff Clark
by Jeff Clark on Jan 17, 2012 9:17 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
We live in Crazy Times, Jeff
I’ve come to expect the unexpected.
if a blogger blogs in the woods and nobody reads
how will he get his daily dose of attention???
read me!!! my opinion mattters!!!
Faith and Sports - an essay by Jeff Clark
I’m open to anything – in a month. Everyone on this roster should be available, because there’s not a soul here now that is an adequate foundation for a rebuild, IMHO.
As for Pierce, his lack of conditioning as the season opened is grounds enough to toss the idea around. It’s been years since I’ve seen such a poorly conditioned player in the green to open the season, and no, the heel isn’t an acceptable excuse. Plenty of ways to condition with that injury. Same goes for Garnett.
With that said, cap space doesn’t impress me as there are no certain, or even probable, good options out there with the space we have.
So, get back to me in a month and we’ll see where this season is. I don’t see a lot of reasons for optimism at this point, and in the meantime, I don’t mind the rumors at all. The old guys need to get their butts in the weight room.
DO NOT trade pierce
Once he gets back into basketball shape he will be fine and score over 20 a game. He is a player that has never relied on athetisism. He has veteran poise and knows how to put the ball in the hole.
Oh yeah not to mention he’s been on the Celtics for 13 years and loyalty still means something in my book.
It's the typical knee jerking talk
This team is getting better. But there is a catch 22 in this discussion. If Pierce plays well enough, so that he actually has some trade value, then the team will almost certainly be in the playoff hunt, and no one is going to throw away a playoff opportunity with this group’s experience.
In two to three more weeks (10 – 12 more games), or so, I am guessing there is a good chance the team will be at about .500 the way the schedule is and with the signs of improvement we are beginning to see. But if that is not the case, and the Celtics remain 4, 5 or more games under .500 at that point, then the team may very well look to add to the assets/options they’ll have going into next year. What form that takes who knows, but the least likely would be trading Pierce.
That said, I like the teams I root for to have some continuity that I can identify with, and I think Pierce could be a very useful piece in many ways on and off the court, as the Celts rebuild . Ray would bring those values as well, if he played on a much lower contract. KG could have value in a back up, mentoring and leadership role, if he would do it at a price that lets them bring in the frontline players they will need. But with KG, I don’t know if his emotional makeup will allow him to go that way.
Times are a changin’, but I think these three guys, who do not have chronic injuries that won’t let them play (as Bird and McHale did) could be instumental in developing a team for the future
by SteveZ from Edgemont on Jan 17, 2012 11:19 PM EST up reply actions
IF a WORTHY deal is out there some how...
Trade him…. no point of hanging on when we are not winning this year with the current roster..if we hang on then hes going to look old in a couple years an then he will have no value to anyone, especially if the c’s are rebuilding.
seriously
where is the loyalty, where is the celtic pride? This man has made our team what it is today. The least he deserves is to retire in Green.
I feel sorry for people who would sell even their own mother to land draft picks and younger players..
There is a thing called gratitude, gratitude for a man without whom we would be at the bottom of the league.
And besides, only 12 games have past, so stop whining
I don't follow rules, I let the rules follow me.
agreed.
I would take great pride in watching #34 become the all time Celtics leading scorer, after following him for his entire career. I would love to see his final game in green as his final game in the NBA, a fitting conclusion to a special career in a game absent of loyalty.
I would treasure these things as a fan much more than an extra late round draft pick, a mediocre journeyman with a big contract, or 10 more wins in a lost season like this. And I’m shocked at how many people are ready to give up all that just because we aren’t winning it all this year.
Gotta remember that if Pierce gets traded it's because he wants that
He’s got a no-trade clause.
So, what if Paul Pierce is told he could be traded to a contender, and have the chance to play for a title over the last two-three years of his career. Wouldn’t it be human for him to want that – and didn’t he pay his dues to this organization for many years already? Would he “deserve” to play out the string on a sinking team, even if he didn’t want that?
Why is that loyalty?
remaining a Celtic through the good and the bad
is the very definition of loyalty. There are zero signs that Paul wants out of Boston at this stage in his career. I can think of nothing we get in return, unless it is of unfair value, that would be more meaningful than keeping Pierce as a leader and mentor for the next generation of this team.
I thought we just established above that he doesn't have a no-trade clause
I’m so confused. Source?
I have to believe you're right.
Sherrod Blakely’s reporting there’s no no-trade clause.
my mother and pierce would never equal
sorry..its only a game and i believe pierce will some how manage to move on.. he woulda left if danny didnt get ray and kg most likely..
by yngbamm on Jan 17, 2012 9:41 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
you should be ashamed
so what, pierce wasn’t old last year? Wake up, don’t be greedy and turn your on him.
I don't follow rules, I let the rules follow me.
just a point
its alot harder to trade a player when they have nothing left..
so trading him for something good would only happen if he can give the other team something ..
No I shouldnt
Pierce is no longer our best player and heck, he ‘s playing like he doesn’t even belong in the NBA. Did you see how Durant was toying with him yesterday. Hes done
by celtz_believer on Jan 17, 2012 10:03 PM EST via Android app up reply actions
You are talking about the same Paul Pierce who made 20+ points the last two games, and Kevin Durant the leading scorer in the NBA the last two season, and who does this night in and night out against any defender because he has that ridicolous stretched length. Paul Pierce made 24 points on 8-15 shooting while Durant made 28 on 9-20 shooting.
And you are saying PP doesn’t belong in the NBA? If he had had this kind of game any of the past few seasons you would probably have said, that it was nice that the captain stepped up for this game but that the others needed to show up too. I know that I would.
Paul Pierce is not in shape and not 100 percent healthy yet, but that doesn’t equal “done” in my book.
by European NBA fan on Jan 17, 2012 10:23 PM EST up reply actions
Darn you and your .. your... rationality!
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Naaah...
If I were to pick only one of the big 3, i’d choose KG. I love him and all but a big man’s shelf life in the NBA is just lesser than shooters. This is purely a media bait following a 5-game losing streak of a once almighty big 3 team.
PP’s our captain. ’Nuff said.
If PP is OK with it...
then I’m OK with it.
Maybe he’d like to join a contender as a valuable contributor.
It looks like it’s not gonna happen in Boston, with this year looking like a wash and then a couple years of rebuilding. By that point he’s likely no longer starter quality, and maybe not bench quality.
PP
is untouchable that being said I wouldn’t mind screwing the Lakers by trading Ray and or KG to one of their competitors.
by calc on Jan 17, 2012 10:14 PM EST via mobile reply actions
It'd be like
ripoint out my gallbladder by hand with no anesthesia
by calc on Jan 17, 2012 10:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I would trade ray to the spurs for K. Leonard and an expiring contract. KG to houston for scola and buddinger. Pierce to the clippers for gomes and leslie… giving you a young team of rondo, Bradley, Moore, leslie, Leonard, johnson, stiemsma.. trade JO to. Chicago for a draft pick and scal.
Dooling, pietrus and bass stay to complete the starting uni w/ rondo & stiemsma
To keep this in perspective and make myself feel better
I have to keep reminding myself that the reports say other teams have been inquiring about Pierce. They don’t say Danny is shopping him.
we're not getting Dwight, guys
think about that before saying we should trade Pierce
the only rationale I can come up with (emotionally speaking)
…is dealing him like the Bruins did Ray Bourque – for a shot at a ring
BUT 2 huge differences here
1. Ray didn’t have one yet
2. they struggled for years to get one before trading Ray, not months/weeks like the Celts are now
my head understands the reasons why Ainge would consider it
my heart loathes the subject even being brought up
Faith and Sports - an essay by Jeff Clark
Those are differences, but...
isn’t it also true that Pierce has a no-trade clause? Which means a deal only gets done if Pierce wants it. I’m hearing a lot of people getting ready to be angry at Ainge. But a deal can’t happen unless Pierce wants it to happen too.
Does that change anybody’s opinion? If you were in Pierce’s shoes and you heard you could have a chance to play for a title contender the last two-three years of your career, would you take it?
If he said..
Yes, i’d have no choice as a fan but to accept it. However, Pierce spent how many years knowing he wasn’t on a title contending team and stayed with them how many years? I find it unlikely he’d jump ship now. If he did though, it’d be worth supporting but I find it unlikely.
by RR_The_Future on Jan 17, 2012 10:49 PM EST up reply actions
Is there anyone who can say for sure and back it up whether he does or does not have a no-trade clause?
It keeps coming up.
I can't say for sure, but Sherrod Blakely thinks Pierce does NOT have a no-trade clause
https://twitter.com/#!/SherrodbCSN/status/159632776054837251
yes,
but i feel its dannys job to use his head an not his heart when it comes to business with anyone.
I feel your pain, Master Po
Not dogging on anyone who is against this one. But my heart also goes back over 20-plus years of misery, and it just can’t go back again. What would you say if the Captain signed off?
if Paul Pierce wants to go then it becomes a different story
If he rejects the tradition that only a few have shared (starting and finishing a career with the Celtics) then that changes perspectives. However, I suspect he wants to be a part of Celtics lore, Celtics tradition, and the unique Celtics Family. If he does want those things, then let that desire and tradition rise above a temporary GM who wants to trade him for temporary gain. Viva la Celtics, Viva Red, Viva Paul Pierce!!!
Is it Soup Yet?
we are loyal fans.
thats why we value loyalty , heart , tradition etc…
but when ticket sales starts plummeting, team starts losing, $$$ , choosing heart over head is stupid. from the owner’s stand point.
Master Po is right. This is an entertainment business.
And sentimentality is an important part of the product.
So the Celtic’s definitely have to consider ‘the heart’ when making decisions like this.
I personally don’t see any realistic scenario that involves Pierce being traded. He’s too valuable as a part of the marketing story for this team, he’s got a manageable contract that probably won’t interfere with rebuilding the team around Rondo and he’s popped 21+ points in 4 of his 9 games so far already while still being considered ‘out of shape’.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Really?
I am sorry. But how many of you have been watching the Celtics for more then just three or four years? I don’t know about you guys but I remember my first basketball jersey. I still have it, it’s a Kansas JayHawks Jersey signed by Paul Pierce. The day he became a Celtic was the day I became a Celtic for life. ( I was also 8 years old).
Back to my point though, did any of you know anything about Paul Pierce other then his service? Or his years of commitment? Or the fact he is the Team Captain. Beside all of those (oh didn’t he just hit 20,000 points as a Celtic in 09?) any how, ignoring all those accomplishments, did anyone read the news when Pierce came up for his new contract? (In 08 or 09, I honestly forget which year it was). Did you guys know he took a PAY CUT? Yes, after winning a championship and being the MVP for said championship, Paul Pierce took a PAY CUT. Why? Because this man is a commited Celtic. He took a pay cut when most players look to take a pay raise for their play. Yet, so many fans have the audacity to trade such a player?
Wait – Before you decide to think this post is just a fan ranting, continue reading.
I am not saying that if a trade worth while is presented, we should not consider it. However, I repeat the same question posted before, what would be worthy for Pierce? if anyone says a lottery pick (unprotected), i’d say that’s worth THINKING on but not a guarantee. What else is out there? Unless I hear a name like DHOWARD coming to be the new Big Green Machine (it’s unlikely), I don’t see any real names being worth trading Pierce for. If a trade that was IN FAVOR of us, i’d say it’s considerable, however, we the FANS and the organization owes Pierce WAY more then what he owes us.
That being said, this guy does deserve special consideration for all he has done for this team. Whether it’s a pay cut or staying a Celtic for all those years of not doing well. Even if that isn’t enough, i’d gladly argue the fact that this man spends so much money on helping the city of Boston, ESPECIALLY the children.
(Steps off soap box)
I hope it doesn’t happen but I guess only time will tell.
This is the best post I have ever read on this forum. Thank you
by Blackberry33 on Jan 17, 2012 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
Amen.
Now this is a true fan.
by The green mamba on Jan 18, 2012 12:02 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
No single player is bigger than the Boston Celtics
Not Russell, not Bird, not Pierce.
Maybe not bigger..
But they are the ones who make the franchise anything. Without Pierce and all he did (the years we were mediocre into his championship ring) That came from a player. Not a tag of the Boston Celtics. The players made that happen and I’d argue in Pierce’s time he has contributed more over all then any other Celtic. He spends so much time and $ on the city of Boston, their children, and their fans.
My point is, this man deserves special consideration. Trade clause or not – we should not be trading the face of the Celtics for OVER a decade to blow up the team. Your captain and the guy who helped keep an organization relevant and turn it into a championship (with help of course!) Should not be wasted away for nothing to “blow it up”.
by RR_The_Future on Jan 18, 2012 12:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
lose some games and everybody goes loco. i doubt the c’s will trade pp. 1. they need his cooperation to trade. 2. they need big time value in return and where is that value? 3. there is a loyalty factor tho not as big as you would imagine on both sides. pp was talking about leaving and used it as a threat so it goes both ways. like some blogger said, there is plenty of $ being made by pp so let’s not feel too bad for him whatever happens. let’s see what plays out and not get too boston hysterical. too many pink hats and overreactive media and fans in this region. we’ve all been shaughnessied in this town.
Would the Captain restructure his contract?
Several arguments have been put forth stating that a trade that has the captain leaving Boston would not be a show of fair dealing and loyalty. Paul Pierce is my favorite athlete and basketball player, period. I would love to see him retire as a Celtic. He has been loyal to the organization and was an integral part of the 08 championship team. When he was frustrated with the direction the franchise was going in pre-big three era, he informed Ainge that unless major moves were made he would want to be traded. My question for you captain and celtics fan, knowing that this team is in a downward slump, would you want to be bought-out and maybe re-sign for way less money if that is possible? Would you sacrifice money (since you have made a good chunk of it) to see the Celtics re-tool/rebuild the roster and become elite contenders again?
by Danyck on Jan 17, 2012 11:01 PM EST via mobile reply actions
He did..
I checked, in the 09-10 season, Pierce re-signed with the Celtics taking about a 5-8% pay cut so the Celtics could offer up another contract to sign more players. Pierce was actually quite angry when Ainge didn’t make any moves after a few weeks of Pierce taking a pay cut.
by RR_The_Future on Jan 18, 2012 12:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
He did..
I checked, in the 09-10 season, Pierce re-signed with the Celtics taking about a 5-8% pay cut so the Celtics could offer up another contract to sign more players. Pierce was actually quite angry when Ainge didn’t make any moves after a few weeks of Pierce taking a pay cut.
by RR_The_Future on Jan 18, 2012 12:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
He did..
I checked, in the 09-10 season, Pierce re-signed with the Celtics taking about a 5-8% pay cut so the Celtics could offer up another contract to sign more players. Pierce was actually quite angry when Ainge didn’t make any moves after a few weeks of Pierce taking a pay cut.
by RR_The_Future on Jan 18, 2012 12:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
All of the great Celtics RETIRED celtics.
That loyalty and sense of pride is something that i have always gravitated towards, because no team celebrates their winning culture quite like the Celtics do. If they traded Pierce, I don’t think I would be able to watch basketball anymore, and not just because the Celtics wouldn’t be competitive, but because I would feel betrayed. Sometimes you attatch yourself to things, and you desperately want to believe that there is some sort of greater good, some sort of unique quality or reciprocal characteristic that pertains to those things, but then you wake up only to see that the Perkins and the Pierces of the world got traded the other night. Someday, I hope to see the jerseys of the new age big 3 up in the rafters, but until then, I’ll keep in mind that it’s nothing personal, just business. For some people, buisiness is all too personal.
Believe
Correction
Antoine Walker didn……. oh…. never mind.
by AussieGreen on Jan 17, 2012 11:18 PM EST up reply actions
Just for fun
The only players that we’re drafted in or after 1990, had an allstar career and retired with the team that they played their first game for are. ….. …. ummm…… ahhh??…………………………… there are none. Dirk Nowitzki, Kobe Bryant, Manu Ginibilli, Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Paul Pierce are the only allstar caliber players who were drafted in or after 1990 and have spent 10+ years with a single team. Very select and rare feet indeed…
by AussieGreen on Jan 17, 2012 11:50 PM EST up reply actions
It's true that most of the great Celtics retired Celtics, but not all
These guys – whose numbers are all hanging in the Garden rafters – played on other teams after their time in Boston: Robert Parish, Cedric Maxwell, Jo Jo White, Dave Cowens, Nate Archibald, Ed Macauley. And if you’re asking about Celtic greats who played all their time for the Cs, the list gets a little shorter. You have to also take off Dennis Johnson and Don Nelson.
That’s eight Celtics with retired numbers who didn’t spend their whole careers in Boston. There are twelve more who did.
has it gotten to the point where we should openly root against the Clippers so we have a better draft pick?
they just lost! optimism!
LOL - we have to root for karma to 'manage' CP3's injury schedule?
Because clearly their season will go as his health goes!
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
as part of the rebuilding process trade him.
his letting the c’s ship sink. time to get a new captain. Pierce is done.
So what does it mean to be a "fan"?
This piece goes to that question. Or could. So what does being a fan mean? I am not asking this rhetorically… I actually have an answer.
The choices are:
1- You love ‘your team’, come hell or high water, regardless of the players. This is it for you. Nothing will sway you. It really doesn’t matter who gets traded for whom.
2- You are besotted by this particular group of people, for whatever reasons. If the group changes enough, the team you once loved disappears, and so is your reason for being a fan.
The problem with #2 is…. sooner or later, you are going to be out of a team to follow. Because all teams change; in fact, all teams eventually change completely.
The problem with #1 is…. it makes you a fan of LAUNDRY, as someone put it above. You’re a fan because the team carries the name of your city, or because you like the logo, or the history, or whatever. All reasons apply EXCEPT the actual people involved…. they are apparently interchangeable.
So what’s the right answer? (Since I said there was gonna be one.) Well…. the answer is…. it’s up to you. To each his own. Some fans love the players on their team, and have to either learn to love the new ones as they come, or move on. Other fans love the laundry. (Ok, the name, the city, the history…. pick your own description.)
There is no right way or wrong way. Pick whichever way you want to waste your free time. Neither way is better than the other, imo.
But for the record, I don’t care much for laundry.
This term is so overused
I don´t root for laundry, I root what this laundry stands for.
PP retires a Celtic and is inducted into the HOF
Nothing to see here—move on, folks
by McHaleinthepost on Jan 17, 2012 11:46 PM EST reply actions
Oh, one more thing
If DA ever traded Pierce for some young punk who played one year of college ball and is the next new thing, a journeyman big man who couldn’t hold Cowens jock, a future draft pick and bag of chips thrown in, I’d burn him in effigy on my front lawn.
Pierce is the epitome of what it means to be a Celtic. I have been a C’s fan for 30 years since Bird was drafted junior eligible by Red. I watched all of the games when we were mediocre or far worse and he carried this team, playing through injuries (how many times did he get his front teeth knocked out?), and always leaving it out on the court. He finally got redemption with the Finals MVP and a ring in ‘08. I still believe in loyalty, character, and pride and Pierce embodies those virtues. He needs to retire a Celtic, have #34 be raised to the rafters, and be inducted into the HOF in Springfield with Doc, KG, Ray, Rondo and Perk looking on. That’s the way it has to be. I care about Pierce’s legacy a lot more than I do this season.
OK—I’ve had my say. Thanks.
by McHaleinthepost on Jan 17, 2012 11:56 PM EST reply actions
I would hate it...
But if an offer is too good, say a pick and a promising young, doesn’t have to be a superstar but a piece who can help (can’t think of any names right now) I’d say yes.
I hope Paul remains a Celtic, but sometimes you gotta do what’s best for the team. This has become a Patrick Ewing scenario.
Some of you are getting carried away
He has been injured, not in game shape and playing the toughest matchups in the league at the 3 spot during process. Trade talks for PP are crazy. Flat out.
Paul Pierce on a team that’s not the Celtics?!? The two ideas simply don’t belong in the same universe. He’s the Captain of the Boston Celtics. Some of the other trades I can wrap my mind around but this is ridiculous crazy talk, about as nauseating as seeing Kobe Bryant wearing the Celtic green. Next article please.
What would Red do?
Celtic Chat Handle: Bird
by David Henderson on Jan 18, 2012 12:15 AM EST reply actions
Trade Pierce
and trade away everything that this franchise is. I wouldnt trade away the tradition of the Celtics for Howard, Chris Paul, and the # 1 pick in the upcoming draft. I think if you trade the captain it would be spitting on what it means to be a Celtic. Or does being a Celtic not mean anything anymore? Its really starting to seem that it dosent mean much to anyone anymore, and that sucks. The way these guys are playing dosent bother me as much as all the screams for trades do. Maybe I’m just getting too old.
Maybe your just getting old
I agree with you, star players should stay with one team for their whole careers but times are changing. Since Kevin Mchale retired no Celtic has spent their entire career as a Celtic. Its a shame but its just the way it is now days.
That's because words like "honor" and
“character” have lost their meaning in today’s fast-pace world.
by Daveonthecape on Jan 18, 2012 5:49 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Maybe the next time a lockout happens
The teams should try to get a franchise player clause where when you draft a guy and he’s rookie contract expires you can sign him to a franchise player contract (the player has to agree) which has a no trade clause + you can pay him 50% more than shows on the salary cap. So, say if you resign a rookie that you drafted or traded for on draft night, after his rookie contract expires you can use your one franchise player option to sign him (for example) to a 5 year $80m deal. So the $80m bit comes off the cap but you can pay him up to an extra 50% more that doesn’t count on your cap, an extra $40m! So by having a rule that only a player drafted by the team or traded for on draft night encourages star players to stay with one franchise their whole career (even if its only for financial reasons). Once you’ve been a franchise player at one team you cannot be a franchise player on any other team. Teams are only allowed to have one franchise player at a time.
Guys like Lebron would have been more enticed to stay at Cleveland if he was offered a franchise player contract because he would have earned almost $33m per year in stark contrast to the contract Miami offered him which I believe is 35% less. Just a theory but I think it could work, of course there would have to be about 1000 clauses – out clauses etc but Im not a lawyer.
Ok, now everybody has that out of their system, can we move on.
by forever_green on Jan 18, 2012 1:21 AM EST via mobile reply actions
off topic but funny i read in bleachreport
Greg Stiemsma doesn’t block shots. The ball fears him and jumps out of his way.
Has loyalty deserted these lands?
I would see these kind of talks in Toronto, Washington etc. The virtues of this ball club are more important that 1 or 2 years of success. It is on these virtues that the C’s have a pride. Imagine your family would trade you when you’re 30 to a younger kid. What would that say about your parents?
Paul Pierce is old, so what? DA signed him for 4 years. He should have signed him for 2 years if he wasn’t sure. Live with your decisions and stand by them.
Here's your answer
Blakely.said it best. See:
http://www.csnne.com/01/17/12/Blakely-Ainge-should-resist-temptation-t/mobile_landing.html?blockID=633112&feedID=3352
by Daveonthecape on Jan 18, 2012 5:36 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The toughest call
This is an incredibly tough thing to even consider.
Look, I love PP34. He’s given us Celtics fans so many good memories. But to put it simply, my love for the Celtics outweights my love for one player. If this means getting closer to an NBA title, then I’m all for it.
I think Paul would understand. He’d lament the decision, but if it enabled us to get 2 max contract players for Rondo to play off of, he would understand. He’s a Celtics legend, regardless of whether he leaves or whether we keep him.
I love Pierce. But I support the Celtics, not one man. So any trade that gets the Celtics another NBA title should happen.. regardless of what it may be.
tough
I firmly believe sentimentality to older players breeds mediocrity in today’s professional sports landscape. It just does. We are conditioned to root for the laundry and I am okay with that because I am a Celtic’s well above any of it’s individual players. I don’t understand fans who say, “if we trade Paul Pierce(or anyone else) I will no longer be a Celtic fan”. To me that makes you a fan of the player above the team and sets you up for disappointment because players in today’s NBA get traded all the time.
With that said I would not shop Paul Pierce at any point but I would listen to offers. It is going to take an offer that completely blows me away to deal Paul Pierce. I’m talking 1st round pick and a young buck or more. I cannot even put together that offer right now but the return has to be huge if you want to pry Paul Pierce away from the Celtics IMO.
Consider the source....
The Yahoo contributor that this article sources digs REALLY deep for stories. While I cannot say there is no scenario out there in which PP gets traded, I think there’s about a 1% chance of it happening this year.
PP is our best scoring threat and our finisher. He is a leader who could transition us out of the Big 3 era (I don’t think Rondo is ready for that load yet). And despite his age and slow start this year, I think younger free agents see him as player they would want to play with and learn from.
And PP is NOT our weakest link this year….BY FAR. Sure, it helps cap space but I don’t see how it helps us as a team. No one’s sacred but PP approaches that alter.
Slow news day.
This is the kind of topic that is guaranteed to generate a zillion comments.
But the chance of it (Pierce being traded) happening are probably close to 1 in a 100. Not zero. But damn close to zero.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by 


































