Retiring Numbers
Although it's sad to say, Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett's days as Celtics are numbered. But when all is said and done, does the banner honoring Celtic greats hanging in the Garden have room for #20 and #5?
Kevin Garnett enjoyed a fantastic career with the Timberwolves, highlighted by his MVP season. He led the league in rebounds for a couple years, made a few All-NBA 1st Teams, and even won the All-Star Game's MVP award. That being said, KG had some amazing years as a Celtic. First and foremost, KG helped bring a 17th Championship to the Celtics as a member of the Big 3. He was named to the All-NBA 1st team that year, and was named Defensive Player of the Year. He continued making All-Star teams and NBA All-Defensive First Teams. He was also the team's emotional leader for several years, keeping Ubuntu alive and preaching lock-down defense. If you ignore his clearly superior stint with the Timberwolves, and focus in on his achievements as a Celtic, it seems like a very solid resume for somebody looking to get their number retired.
Ray Allen also enjoyed a fantastic career prior to his days as a Celtic, but Ray was shipped around a little bit, playing for the Bucks and Sonics before coming to the Celtics. He isn't linked to a single other ball-club as much as KG is, so retiring his number as a Celtic seems more reasonable. But as a Celtic, he also had some amazing seasons of his own. He's leading all Celtics in three-point and free throw percentage in a season. He also has the highest career free throw percentage as a Celtic in history. In addition, he broke several NBA records as a Celtic, most notably the most 3 pointers ever made. Finally, he was a key cog in the Big 3's Championship run in 2008, and has been helping us contend ever since.
So what do you guys think? Despite their short tenure as Celtics, do they deserve to have their numbers hang from the banners?
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not even close. There is only one player on the roster whose number should even be discussed as being retired. #34.
Other than that, Rondo has got a chance. But he’s got to put in a lot more time.
As for the hired guns of Ray Allen and KG … they shouldn’t come close to having their numbers retired.
Editor at Alligator Army.
but they arent just hired guns
they completely changed the culture of this city and our team. ubuntu was formed around them, and they turned our lottery-bound organization into a championship-thirsty one. theyve already been around for 5 years on the team, and won the hearts of everyone in MA.
~Aaron
by bostonceltics on Jan 19, 2012 2:55 AM EST up reply actions
So five years and one championship, even though they’re best years have been behind them… is enough to retire a number for the Boston Celtics?
Standards have diminished, I guess.
Editor at Alligator Army.
I accidentally voted the wrong option...
I meant to say neither should be retired unless they get another championship.
I can't imagine one being voted in without the other
It wouldn’t make sense to me for Ray to get it and KG not to, or vice versa. They’re kinda a package deal
~Aaron

by 


































