Trading For Nash and Gortat
Promoted FanPost
I confess I'm one of those "bad" fans who sometimes enjoys watching Rondo play but most of the time wishes he was a little bit more disciplined. A lot of people have expressed their issue with Rondo: lack of improvement, lack of a reliable jumper, lack of free throw shooting... turnovers. I'm with them. Others, meanwhile, have expressed why they (and we all) love Rondo's game: he played with a dislocated elbow! he's a great passer! we won a championship with him! He dominated the Cavs (we live in the present not in the past). He's a Top 5 PG (no, he's not).
The thing is, Rondo's weaknesses are a burden when we play elite teams: Heat, Lakers, Bulls (let's see if he proves me wrong tomorrow against Rose), and those weaknesses overshadow his strengths.
I believe this team has another run in them; I really do; but it's not happening without a reliable center (and I think we can all agree on this).
At first, trading Rondo for Nash doesn't sound too good, but trading Rondo for Nash AND Gortat? Now we're talking.
Our problem at center would be fixed and we'd have a PG who can actually shoot and pass. Granted, Nash's defense isn't good, but the only guy who is a serious threat at PG in the East is Derrick Rose (and, frankly, I don't think Rondo can lock down Derrick Rose in a 7-game series. And without a great center? Forget about it).
In the short-term, acquiring both Nash and Gortat would make us a better team, while also giving us even more cap space this summer. I believe we can get another great PG in the draft. Rondo, after all, was the 21st pick. But a center like Gortat who averages a double-double of 15.2PPG and 10.1RPG (basketball-reference) and makes around 7 million dollars a year (hoopshype.com)? Those are not easy to find. Heck, Perkins has a contract through 2014-15 and in his final year he'll make more than 9 million dollars (hoopshype), and he isn't as good as Gortat!
The Suns would do this because Rondo fits their run and gun system perfectly, and, yes, even though giving up Gortat might be too much, what they really need is to rebuild through the draft and put pieces around Rondo.
There are a lot of scenarios that could work in this trade: Rondo+O'Neal=Nash+Gortat; Rondo+O'Neal+Daniels= Nash+Gortat+Hill; Rondo+O'Neal+Moore+Clippers' first round pick=Nash+Gortat+Aaron Brooks.
Actually, if we get Aaron Brooks, we'd be looking at a starting lineup of Brooks, Pierce, Jeff Green and Gortat in the future. That's not bad, and we can make another serious run this year!
Anyway, there are a lot of variations, but the important thing is to make a championship run with Nash and Gortat and then look to rebuild via draft, free agency, and sign and trade (Ray Allen, Brandon Bass) this summer.
(P.S.: I don't want Robin Lopez!!!).
Be respectful and keep it clean. Thanks.
51 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I've wanted Gortat on the Cs for a while ...
and Nash would certainly open things up on offense. I would love this trade, but I can’t see Phoenix going for it.
by rocknrollforyoursoul on Feb 11, 2012 9:38 PM EST reply actions
Don't do it
Wait till off season. Let the guys play the season out
These same people
Will be hanging from his stugots the next time he has a triple double, just sayin!
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
by Celtics_Diva on Feb 11, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
And it happened
TODAY!!! Just like I said!
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
by Celtics_Diva on Feb 12, 2012 7:49 PM EST up reply actions
Knock it off already
With this trade rondo stuff! He’s not the reason we lost the last two games. We lost by one point to the lakers in a game that nobody drove to the basket to get fouled. Then they lost in Toronto yesterday because they were exhausted. This rondo stuff is lame now. Stop it!
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
Nobody drove cuz the defense was packed in
You say no one drove, (which is right), but you don’t mention why. The reason is, because the defense was collapsing in to pack the paint, playing off rondo. By giving rondo space at the top, it’s like having an extra defender camped in the lane. It makes no sense to drive into a double (or triple) team like that. You just have to hit your shots. We lost cuz kg missed his, Paul missed a lot of his, and rondo was scared to even take any. If we had a pg that needed to be guarded on his shot, THEN we could drive, cuz the lane would be more open
by dtrader on Feb 11, 2012 10:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If you think that the paint points
Were affected by rondo being on the floor, then doc could have very easily put him on the bench and played either of the two other point guards he has. Not a reason to trade him.
PS. If I’m not mistaken, I believe rondo had more points than KG. Nobody is screaming trade him.
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
by Celtics_Diva on Feb 11, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
Don't you think there is a problem if you have to take out a star player
Because he can’t shoot and is completely messing up the offensive spacing? Rondo is not the only one to blame for the last 2 losses, but he deserves some and he should be the guy taking the team on his shoulders and carrying them (this was supposed to be the year he becomes the man). The reason people want to trade Rondo is because he is young and has some value especially with a reasonable contract for an allstar point guard. KG’s contract is huge and expiring, Ray Allen is expiring, and for now PP is staying. That is why you don’t hear as much trade demands for other Celtics. JO is expiring, and everyone else is young or just a bench player.
Smh
The funniest thing in the world would be for the celts to trade rondo and then become the laughing stalk and fall out of even making it to the playoffs because the team cannot recover from losing rondo. That is exactly what would happen if he is traded this season. Trading perk made the celts soft, so what do you think the outcome would be of trading rondo? For who anyway? 50 year old Steve Nash.
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
by Celtics_Diva on Feb 11, 2012 11:09 PM EST up reply actions
of course they were...
THE LAKERS DIDNT EVEN GUARD RONDO!!!!! They just loaded 5 players on the other 4 and kept two in the paint.
Believe
by Green Oracle on Feb 12, 2012 12:41 AM EST up reply actions
I think the idea is play steve nash only for this year
And have gortat be the center for the near future, while rebuilding.
I'd do it
Love Rondo but Nash and Gortat would be so great. Better interior D with JO coming off the bench, Nash can really spread the floor and really helps in clutch situations where free throws or shots need to be made. I think he’d play another year for cheap too so do it if given the opportunity. I really thought Rondo would improve this year but he’s not doing any better.
What’s our choices in FA though?
"Victory belongs to the most Preserving" - Napoleon
by RotB_MattR on Feb 12, 2012 1:44 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
You people are off your meds
You complain that we are too old, but you wanna sign STEVE NASH! Wow!
Celtics fan from Brooklyn, NY
Id do this trade in a heartbeat!
rondo most overrated player in the nba, even more than perkins. Look what perkins is doing this year. The big 3 deserve some help for a final run. Gortat and Nash provide this!
Nash, for some reason, is playing out of his mind - even with his current age
Right now, I’d rather have Nash than Rondo.
Rondo is playing with no heart and it shows out there. Nash is playing out of his mind and doing his best to win. Where is this kind of Rondo?
Rondo is standing around and waiting for Ray Allen to get open. Nash penetrates and moves the ball around. Where is this kind of Rondo?
Yes, Nash is incredibly old but he IS playing a whole lot better than Rondo. Rondo is a better defender but lately, for most of this season and last season, he has gambled a lot and doesn’t pressure often on defense. For fuck sakes, Jose Calderon scorched the kid and THAT’S inexcusable.
Not only do we get a better PG that’s playing well this year (honestly we NEED to win THIS YEAR – the Big 3 are getting too old, guys), we will get GORTAT, an actual Center that can really help the Celtics with their rebounding woes and his good offense. We will ACTUALLY have a Center.
Those two for Rondo… I’ll take it!
Suns say no.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
Once again...
I’m not on the bandwagon who doesn’t want to trade Rondo and watch us suffer. The team has gone through enough misery after the Perkins trade and has affected Rondo’s game ever since. Therefore…
TRADE RONDO FOR NASH AND GORTAT IN A HEARTBEAT!
Seriously.
Stop bringing up Perkins. It’s over and done with. Also, he ain’t doing jack in OKC.
The player taken with the clippers pick will be better than either rondo or perkins regardless if we keep the pick or not!
I doubt it...
It’s pretty unlikely that a late 1st rounder becomes either a starting center or an all-star PG.
All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino
Well...
Yeah, Tony Parker, but that’s a pretty unique case… We can get another Great PG with our pick, though. Rondo, Lowry, Lawson are good examples.
by Celticsdude on Feb 12, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
I'm a Rondo fan and I still believe he is our main man right now...
…but I have to admit, if an offer like that is on the table, Nash + Gortat… hmmm… that’s something I’m sure DA will be very interested in for a short term deal. The C’s are gonna have an overhaul for next season anyway… but yeah, I’m still a Rondo fan ;)
Good promoted article, Celticsdude!
Rondo has the skill to be a top 5 PG..
but he does not have the leadership nor the willingness to assume the leadership position. His reaction to perkin’s trade, his non existence improvement in his fg n ft , his ups n downs, show that he is not matured yet as a professional. We need to change, trading for Gortat solves the Center position, and stabilizes PG. Don’t why the Suns want to do it though.
by indocelts on Feb 12, 2012 3:46 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Terrible trade
I take nothing away from Nash but for anyone to believe that Gortat is a championship making center, well, it boggles my mind.
Rondo has had two bad games. And yes, as I wrote in a post after the Lakers game, the Lakers kill us because they don’t defend Rondo—AT ALL. That coupled with the fact that we do not have a low post offensive threat or a board clearer on the defensive end and we will never match up well with a team with the Lakers height advantage in the paint (unless we have a lights out shooting night from the outside).
All of that being said, let’s judge Rondo on the past two games and not what we perceive to be his temperamental shortcomings. The Perk trade and his perceived reaction to it are done. I don’t think we need Rondo to be the “leader”—-yet. We need him to be the catalyst and when he is (not the last two games) we look like a championship contender even though we have obvious low-post deficits. Rondo IS our fast break. He’s playing without a teammate night in and night out who can make it up the floor with him. He’s running into three defenders up the floor before his aging teammates make it to half court. Trading away Rondo is trading away our only speed for very old legs. We are also forgetting that Nash doesn’t play defense half as well as Rondo, even Rondo on an “off” night.
I think Rondo gets a lot of the blame because when he’s really on, we look so good. But let’s not forget PIerce’s sub-par performances the past two nights. If Pierce had even an average game, we would have beaten the Lakers and this trade “idea” would seem even more silly.
Rondo for C. Paul made sense. Rondo for an aging S. Nash and a center who will get beaten up in the playoffs. I don’t think so.
right now,
Nash is averaging more assists in less minutes per game. He’s played 8 more games than Rondo, with nearly 100 more assists and only 20 more turnovers. He has a lower turnover per rate and higher assists-per 48mins played. Nash is within the top 50 for scoring league leaders and Rondo is not. Rondo has a slight edge in rebounds in steals but assists and scoring are more important from the point guard position, and if this trade were to go down Gortat would make a HUGE difference on the inside. Forget about age for a minute and just let that stats do the the talking. How could you not want Nash over Rondo? Nobody believes we’re winning it all this year so why make a trade that greatly improves this teams two glaring weaknesses (a point who can shoot and a center who can rebound) to better compete in the playoffs? If it works out, we have banner 18 and Nash, Allen and Garnett all come back for another year for cheap and our success convinces Dwight Howard to come fill in the missing piece of the puzzle and compete for 1 or 2 more titles. If it doesn’t, Nash, Allen & Garnett all come off the books this summer anyway and we have more cap space for the rebuilding process. It’s win-win, and believe me when I tell you Rondo is a great player and all but he is NOT the future face of the franchise!
by Mikey Bizzle on Feb 12, 2012 10:29 AM EST via iPhone app reply actions
Funny thing is if this happened
Gortat would play behind Dwight again lol but I’d do this trade.
"Victory belongs to the most Preserving" - Napoleon
by RotB_MattR on Feb 12, 2012 12:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
the future is now, right now
i agree with your assessment. i doubt the suns do it but if they did and we signed przybilla and the rest of the squad was healthy we’d be in good shape to make a run and that’s what you want; a healthy veteran team that knows how to win ready to make a deep push for the title. it’s not that i don’t like rondo, he’s a great player but for what we are now, he’s the one to trade because he might bring back what we need now to win. as for going forward, well, that’s next year and with this trade we still retain our flexibility. and as i’ve said elsewhere, rondo is not the piece you build around; he’s not even a #2 guy. hey, i’d love to be wrong; danny holds on to rondo signs przybilla and the team gels with RR leading the band and we win it in 6 against the lakers in the garden. but i’m afraid that’s a pipe dream. aloha
by bigislandbob on Feb 12, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
Why would Phoenix want to trade Nash and Gortat in the 1st place- for Rondo?
The way he’s going, Nash and G. Hill will be balling until they’re in their 50s the way they’re going.
Hill turns 40 this year, and I would still love to have him on the Cs.
Nash is like Ray Ray, who’ll keep on playing at a high level until they get carried out on a stretcher.
Rondo is damaged goods at the moment, as he’s been blowing hot and cold, with good and bad games here and there. He’s going to have to prove himself again this season, after returning from his injury.
Nash almost never has a bad game [ his defence is not the greatest, but apart from that ] and is a model of consistency.
Lygafe.
Lionel Gaffen / Fotomix.
Lygafe
Lionel Gaffen / Fotomix | International Hockey Forums > Europe > ISRAEL
Israel Recreational Hockey Association 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 [ Lygafe ] | Israel Ice Skating Federation - From the Media [ Lionel Gaffen ]
Good point
As it stands right now. Gortat has more trade value than Rondo and Nash is a better player than Rondo. We’d have to chuck in a pick or 2 for the Suns to even consider this.
by AussieGreen on Feb 13, 2012 12:40 AM EST up reply actions
Rondo is playing his worst right now
I think you should ask yourself- if Rondo was playing like he was last fall- i.e. at least a no-doubt all-star reserve, would you still make this trade?
I’m not totally sure of the answer, but don’t go to the grocery store hungry.
rondo vs nash... PLUS WE GET A GORTAT
S. Nash Career numbers 14.6 pts, 8.5ast, 3rb, 1stl, 49%, 43%3pt, 90%ft
S. Nash numbers 11/12 14.6 pts, 10.3ast, 2.6rb, .6stl, 56%, 45%3pt, 87%ft
R. Rondo Career numbers 11pts, 7.6ast, 4rb, 2stl, 49%, 24%3pt, 62%ft
R.Rondo numbers 11/12 13pts, 9.5ast, 4.6rb, 1.6stl, 49%, 23%3pt, 59%ft
Steve Nash is a better fit for this teams STYLE OF PLAY AND ITS PACE than Rondo is. That is a fact, not an opinion, how many times have we watched Rondo race up the floor only to pull up, throw a wild shot off the glass, hoping it somehow goes in or pull it back out while waiting on the rest of the team to catch up??? How many times have we seen Rondo dribble the ball in one spot for 12 seconds before passing it to someone? Don’t get me wrong, I love what Rondo brings to the game 70% of the time, its the other 30% when he is not being aggressive, not being assertive, when he is pouting or is indifferent to doing the right thing that is unacceptable. I would think that our Celtics would have a greater chance at banner 18 with a Nash and a gortat than the way our team is currently constructed. IF we have a chance to win this year, then DA should pull the trigger, if the trade makes us BETTER this year as a TEAM, DA has planned on rebuilding this summer for years, this trade even helps in that regard, creating more cap room, or DA could bring back KG, Allen, Nash, etc… for another run next year….
Why on earth would you compare the career numbers of a young player to the career numbers of an old player?
Trade Brandon Bass for Žydrūnas Ilgauskas!!!
by sofutomygaha on Feb 12, 2012 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
i also compared this years numbers
Yes, even at the age of 38 Nash is outballin Rondo!! Another thing, is there anyone who believes that Rondo will become a two time MVP…
A better comparison if you choose only young players, go to epn comparisons and plug in Rondo vs westbrook, deron Williams, mo Williams, et al… not to mention the cp3, rose etc…
This post was about trading Nash/gortat for Rondo, whose career numbers should I compare Rondo to????
by greensince72 on Feb 12, 2012 1:22 PM EST up reply actions
don't even need to compare career numbers, just compare this years!!!
At the age of 38 NASH is still OUTBALLIN RONDO
by greensince72 on Feb 12, 2012 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
because nash performs year, after year, after year....
REGARDLESS of whomever he is playing with…
by greensince72 on Feb 12, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
sofumygaha
He was just putting them up for reference, but just look at THIS years stat compare. And read the rest of the post excellent points about how regardless of who you think is the better PLAYER, Nash is clearly the better FIT for this team and the examples of things Rondo does that we the less tolerant are sick of seeing, his “how many times” points.
by Mikey Bizzle on Feb 12, 2012 1:36 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
thanks...
Sooooo many people just look at age, or point per game and refuse to look at the overall picture on how a team works or what type of a system that player is operating in….
by greensince72 on Feb 12, 2012 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
For what it's worth
The fans on the Suns SBNation blog don’t think they’ll get much of anything back for Nash. They are envisioning scenarios like Felton and picks from Portland or Shumpert and Fields from New York.
thats why we need to get a gortat in the deal if we swap nash for rondo
Pho gets a near all star PG locked up on a reasonable contract for the next 3 years, while we get a good young center also with a reasonable contract
HUH..
I can’t believe that so many of you are seriously discussing a nash for rondo trade..I for one am ashamed for most of you..and you call yourselves celtic fans?!
it is really a rondo for gortat trade...
And a Nash for joneal trade but Shh… don’t tell the suns that. Lol
with a gortat in the middle,
We actually have a chance to win in the post season when the game slows down to a half court game.
rondo plays too fast for this team...
And the only players that can run with him are jjj, Moore, bradley, Wilcox and pietrus. We will get eaten alive come playoff time. Steve Nash & gortat fit alongside KG, Allen and pierce, with a genuine chance to win it all. Just look at last years playoffs, that what we are looking at this year except we might not make it out of the first round this year…..

by 


































