Celtics Blocked In Overtime, Can't Beat L.A.
Pierce missed the shot at the end but Ray Allen got the rebound and the chance to win the game but Gasol got the block and that was the game. Celtics fall to Lakers in overtime.
- Both teams shot the ball poorly (under .400) all night
- Kobe, as usual, seems to hit the difficult shots at a higher clip than the normal ones
- Hard not to get flashbacks to the Finals when Gasol and Bynum are getting tip-in baskets and there's nothing we can do about it
- Everyone played heavy minutes in this one, so it hurts that much more to get the loss
- Doc called up a good play at the end of regulation but for some reason Pierce didn't get the ball to Ray Allen - again, kind of reminds me of the broken play from the Finals (still hurts)
- The ghost of Derek Fischer shot 0-7 tonight, so there's that
- Bradley dressed but (apparently) couldn't play. We could have used him out there to hassle the Lakers point guards.
- So tired of seeing Garnett miss layups in traffic. I wish he was just more aggressive and finished with authority instead of trying to finesse it up there.
- Pierce had a below average night - which still happens against the Artest currently known as Metta more often than I'd like to admit
- Lakers only made 1 three pointer?
- Celtics only took 5 free throws?
- Now the C's have to fly to Toronto to play tomorrow night. Will they have enough energy to beat the Raptors again?
339 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not blow it up. Just except that this team and the Lakers are slightly better than average
Unless the Celtics get an inside presence, this will happen against most good teams.
Yep!
The only one who looked older than KG tonight was D. Fisher, retirement home ready!
If Danny Boy doesn’t let KG & Ray Ray walk after this season, get ready for quite a few years
of mediocrity around these parts my friends, just saying.
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 9, 2012 11:52 PM EST up reply actions
Absolutely ZERO presence at center
big problem
Well
I think JO did a good job defending Bynum at times in the game, but as a whole I agree the C’s needed some more production at center.
I hate to sound like a broken record but throwing the Steamers size and length at the Lakers big and long front court duo of Bynum and Gasol maybe, just maybe would of helped tonight.
Also with the C’s not having any in the paint scoring presence there was no pressure put on Bynum or Gasol to tire them out or to possibly get them in foul trouble and out of the game to change the complexion of the game.
Tonights game was just like a playoff 1/2 court power game and if the C’s do not develop some more offense from there current bigs in the paint or acquire a low post scoring big, it will be tough for them in the playoffs to play solely on a perimeter based offense in my opinion.
trade idea
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=84zyh4o LA would also send ebanks and goudelock to Charlotte
charlotte gets 3 young players both LA and Boston get much better pacers maybe need a pick too but they get better too i think
by JuJuan some moore on Feb 9, 2012 11:22 PM EST up reply actions
Laker fan here...
No chance we give up Bynum, Ebanks and Mini-Mamba for Bass, Granger and Collison. If Bynum gets traded, it’s ONLY going to be for Dwight Howard. Think about it. There are two dominant centers in the game today and Bynum is one of them. We’re not giving him up for an average PG, a finesse PF and a shooting SF. If the Lakers and Celtics trade with each other, it’s going to be Gasol, Metta and maybe Luke’s expiring contract next year for Rondo, but even that is highly unlikely.
Personally, I’d like to see us send Bynum, Luke’s contract and a couple of picks to Orlando for Howard, and then turn around and flip Gasol, the Trade Exception and maybe Ebanks to NJ for Deron Williams. Pipe dream? Probably.
Chris Wilcox doesn't do it for you?
What the hell they sign that guy for? He absolutely sucks!
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 9, 2012 11:54 PM EST up reply actions
HOLLYWOODN'T
Q1 Ray was active at both ends of the court,
He epitomizes beauty in this particular sport.
In field goals attempted Kobe’s ahead of the lot,
Three minutes left in Q1 took and made his first shot.
Bass and Pietrus came in, they’re fun to see,
Bass—his signature shot, Pietrus for three.
Once Kobe got started, he went on a run,
And that’s how the Lakers ended Q1.
Q2 a minute eight seconds—’Quis wanted to stay,
He played NO defense so right in came Ray.
JO had two blocks, but the Cs fans were queasy,
When quite a few times he missed shots that were easy.
Perhaps on Ray’s defense we don’t want to be reliant,
But he does a pretty good job guarding Kobe Bryant.
Ray blocked Fisher, very aggressive on D,
Playing at both ends, how he started Q3.
RAY ALLEN FOR THREE, Cs went on a run,
Rondo coast to coast, lost the ball, run was done.
Kobe forced a shot right over Ray,
Which made the Cs’ lead go the other way.
14-4 run by the Lakers we did see,
67 (them)-64 at the end of Q3.
First bench points for the Lakers happened in Q4,
When Troy Murphy, one time Celtic, was able to score.
Gotta love when Pietrus makes his three,
And shows his Cs shirt for all to see.
KG and Fisher have a jump ball,
Two old guys giving their all!
Cs disorganized, then RAY ALLEN FOR THREE,
Tie: Gasol tipped the ball shot by Ko-be.
Alas, you thought this was the end of this rhyme,
But instead we head into overtime.
Kobe double dribbled and made the shot,
Rondo missed the jumper, guarding him they’re not.
Pierce for three, one point lead didn’t last,
Kobe made sure the Lakers scored fast.
Ray’s follow up attempt could have won the game,
But that shot was blocked, by Gasol, that’s his name.
Magic and Bird, remember them in their day?
Forget about Hollywood, they are on Broadway.
Really impressed on how you do it on the fly every time.
"The idea is not to block every shot. The idea is to make your opponent believe that you might block every shot."
- Bill Russell
by Marjun Raposon on Feb 9, 2012 10:47 PM EST up reply actions
Scripted
This increased my suspicion that every NBA game (at least Celtics game) is scripted well in advance with every possession fully documented in a secret little book. that mycelts has a copy of.
by getthat18now on Feb 10, 2012 6:05 AM EST up reply actions
Disgusting loss to a mediocre team
When you can’t rebound the game, you can’t win. When you have no inside offensive presence, you can’t win. When 90 percent of your shots are jump shots, you can’t win. When the opposition only has to guard 4 of your 5 players, you can’t win. Fun to see the Lakers and Celtics tonight, but neither of these teams will be there at the end. They are both slightly better than average. The Lakers’ bench is almost as embarrassing as the Celtics inability to rebound. Thanks, Danny, for the centers on this team.
15-11 is not mediocre
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
There's plent of time left to get closer
to a win rate close to 66%. That should give us a decent enough seed for an interesting run. Clearly we are a mid level playoff seed in the east or slightly better, which is all you can ask for at this point. It’s going to be a fun ride!
Jesus Shuttlesworth: I hate my name. What kind of name is Jesus anyway?
Jake Shuttlesworth: It's biblical.
Jesus Shuttlesworth: Yeah, no kidding.
by jakeshuttlesworth on Feb 10, 2012 1:54 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
why?
Too many three"
We were Scared to go into the paint
KG cold as ice
Pietrius is the New Antoine Walker…..quit shooting three’s!!!!! go to the rim!!!
Is it Soup Yet?
But there are no 4’s, so leave him alone!
by P2 on Feb 9, 2012 10:57 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agree 100%
when you said:
C’s were took too many threes, were Scared to go into the paint and that KG was cold as ice.
All 3 played a big role in the loss tonight.
Grimy game that didn't go our way
Try again March 11.
Rocking the warmups could not even help the Celtics. Horrible ball movement, Kg could not hit side of barn, Pierce tried at the end but could not do it. Ray had a good game but got cold toward the end. 5 on 4 because RR can’t shoot really hurt us!
by Blackberry33 on Feb 9, 2012 10:48 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Good game
Not sweating the L. We do however need a solid big that can play some consistent D, has some speed and has the desire to grab every rebound. We dont even need a scoring big, just one that can box out and stop other bigs from scoring. On a side note, ray cant guard kobe…unfortunatley
by Kgwillkillyou on Feb 9, 2012 10:50 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Bynum is...
pretty damn great.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
The same can be said about Gasol as well.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
The problem remains the same..
Rebouding. Regardless of how close the game was, if we can somehow improve our rebounding.. we can be dominant.
God, how much do I wish we had a player like Joakim Noah or even Varejao.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Agree
LA beat the C’s tonight 55 to 45 on the boards, if they could of rebounded a bit better the C’s would of won the game.
"The problem"
It’s not “The” problem.
If rebounding were the problem then yeah, the only way they could have won would be if they had gotten more rebounds. Sure – that would have done the trick.
But they ALSO could have won if KG had simply made any one of those 9 straight misses at the end. Or if someone had gotten to that loose ball before Blake. Or if Pierce had simply seen a better angle to get the ball to the wide-open Ray at the end. Or if ….
It is never just one thing. I know the rebounding differential looks impressive. But the plain fact is that despite racking up 110 rebounds in the last two games, the Lakers lost one game and barely won this one by 1 point.
Saying we need more rebounds – sure, that’s great. But rebounds in of themselves are just one part of the game and not the big magic bullet that many seem to think.
Our problem tonight was poor execution on offense. Lack of any sustained attempt to attack the paint.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Of course they had impact. I never said they didn't.
But their impact is overstated.
How many did they have? About 10 or so?
How many points did they win by? So, “dominating” on put-backs …. gives you a 1 point advantage?
The game is won-lost by making your opponent miss shots (something we did okay tonight) and making our own shots (something we didn’t do well tonight).
We had 45 rebounds of our own tonight – including 12 ORBs. The Lakers grabbed 40 of our misses. The last word is the core problem. We shot only 39%!!!!! That’s why the Lakers grabbed so many rebounds: BECAUSE WE MISSED SO MANY SHOTS! We missed 59 shots. 40 of 59 is 69% – HA! That’s actually LESS than the Laker’s normal, league-average DRB% coming into the game!
People are all freaking out about rebounds. Rebounds are important. But the more important problem is that we missed so many shots. If we don’t miss so many shots, then there are fewer rebounds for the defense to grab. And of course, the reason we missed so many shots is because we kept settling for jump shots instead of attacking inside (with a small side dish of nobody running with Rondo on breaks).
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Rebounds were definitely HUGE tonight
The game tying basket late in regulation by the Lakers was on an offensive rebound by Gasol as KG stood by and watched.
The game winning basket in OT was on an offensive rebound by Bynum.
The Celtic’s initial defense was superb for much of the night but they simply gave the Lakers too many chances to score.
The problem isn’t necessarily the amount of offensive rebounds given up, it’s when they occur. Tonight the Lakers got the game tying and winning baskets on possessions kept alive by offensive rebounds…
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
Oh - so a rebound at one moment of the game is different in value from one at another time?
Are points scored at different times added up on the scoreboard differently?
If we make just one of the 59 shots we missed at any point in the game – does that ‘HUGE’ offensive rebound ‘late in regulation’ by Gasol still tie the game?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
No but it's just another example
where rebounding matters. Matters more than how much you think it matters.
Kobe didn’t kill us tonight. Their big men did with rebounding and getting easy buckets/and1s did.
They shot 36 for 91 = .396, We shot 38 for 97. The game wouldn’t have been this close had we grabbed just a couple more rebounds, and limited their offensive posseions.
Blaming the game on us missing shots solely as a factor is nonsense. It was a defensive game. It’s not like they shot 50% vs our 39%. Both teams shot terribly because of the great defense display by both teams which led to poor shooting. It’s not like we shot miserable vs the Wizards.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
"Blaming the game on us missing shots solely as a factor is nonsense"
Nonsense?
No. If you look at the way the Celtics play over the last few years – and this is what they need to do based on their personnel – they have a very precise formula for winning. They NEED to convert at close to 50% and they need to hold opponents to the low 40%. Those two numbers combined with grabbing anywhere north of 70% of DRBs will lead to winning.
When they execute their offense and defense correctly, those are the numbers that they achieve. Tonight, they executed their defense. They did not execute their offense.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Disagree wholeheartedly
I don’t agree with those numbers. I am sure the chances of winning is pretty damn great if we achieve those numbers, but that isn’t going to happen a lot vs teams like the Bulls, Heat, Lakers, Mavs, Thunder, and so on.
Those numbers isn’t the recipe for winning.
We bring the avg up by playing teams like the Raptors, Wizards and bring it down when we play the teams I listed. The avg is created for that reason. We can’t possibly expect to have the same kind of execution vs the Bulls or the Lakers. I say you’re crazy if you expect the Cs to shoot 50% going into the game vs the Lakers, Bulls, and so on. The Lakers missed their chances, but gained back their possessions which should have never been given.
What I am saying is we could have overcome the deficit or poor shooting by grabbing rebs or boxing out. A few plays stick out in this game esp the ones where Bynum got the and1 and the putback. Same with Gasol.
Whatever, I see your point. I just think we need to rebound better vs elite teams or else, we are out early.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Let me be clear: We DO need to rebound better.
We need to do LOTS of things better.
But the thing we MOSTLY need to do better is to get better, higher percentage shots than we got tonight.
As vinnie points out – we settled for far too many outside jump shots. Those are lower percentage than shots at the rim. That’s why we missed so many shots.
The reason I’m trying to get people to not stress ‘quite’ so much over the rebounds is that it is a myth that we have to ‘win the rebound battle’ in order to win the game. As many have said, if we get just one more rebound (definitely on defense, only possibly on offense) then we win the game. But we would have still ‘lost the rebound battle’ by … 54-46.
Look, I know this is not always intuitive, but you have to break the game into possessions. Each team ends up with the same number of possessions in a game. The goal is to score points on your possessions and prevent points on their possessions. Rebounds are a component of each side of the equation, but only a component. On the offensive side, when you realize that if you miss a shot, even the worst defensive rebounding team is most likely to grab it close to 70% of the time, then it becomes critical that you don’t miss your first shot! I.E. – your strategy should be focused on creating the highest percentage first shot on each possession. For the most part, since the Big 3 formed, we have been among the NBA leaders in doing this. We constantly rank in the top 2-3 teams in FG%.
Conversely, on the defensive side, your goal should be to make them take the lowest percentage shot because if they miss, you are going to be able to grab it at least 70% of the time. This is why, on offense, after the shot goes up, the C’s mostly shed and get back on transition D. This is because statistically, the moment the shot leaves their hand, if they miss it, they have a significantly better chance on average of getting the ball back by getting back, forcing a low-percentage (below about 43%) shot and grabbing the defensive rebound (again, at a >70% clip) than they do of grabbing the offensive rebound. Again, during the Big 3 era, we have usually been among the best at holding our opponents to low FG%.
This year, we have been very inconsistent on each side of this. Early in the year, we were letting other teams shoot close to 50% constantly. Lately, we have really clamped down on that and the wins started coming. But last night we also shot really poorly – due inability to attack inside. And the result was a one-point loss.
These numbers are proven and measured. They arent something that you ‘agree or disagree’ with. They just are. Even the poorest defensive rebounding team grabs close to 70% of missed shots and even the best of offensive rebounding teams barely grab 30%. This is a fundamental of how the game works out every season. Celtic championship teams going back to Red’s day understand this and have used the strategy of max/min shot percentage that Doc preaches when he says, “It’s a make/miss league!”
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
"If we get one rebound at the end of regulation we would have given ourselves a great chance to win. We got stops but didn’t rebound."
Thank you captain.
"They’re really long and good. We did a good job on Kobe. Listen, both teams shot 39%, someone had to win."
Thank you Doc.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Or, one shot
mmmm’s got a point. Btw our starting 5 at present has the same problem as the Perk-5: only 3 shooters on the court. Think about that.
"Celtics bring order and structure to a chaotic world"
Of course late game situations matter more
Of course grabbing a rebound on the Lakers final possession of regulation is more valuable than at other times given the situation.
It’s hard to play the what if game. Yes if the Celtics had made one more basket then it could have been a mute point. However if down 4 instead of 2 late in the game the Lakers could have hit a 3, stolen the inbounds pass and hit a game winning 3 pointer who knows.
It’s why players and teams are revered for the crunch time exploits. If you have two players who both shoot 75% from the line overall but one is 90% in the 4th quarter while the other is 60% who would a coach want with the ball to close out a game?
No matter what plays were made by either team leading to that point, the game came down to late game execution in regulation and OT. The Lakers stopped the Celtics from scoring in both situations while the Celtics failed to prevent the Lakers from scoring due to giving up 2 crucial offensive rebounds…
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
"Of course"
Well, since you assert it that way, what is there to argue?
You are, of course, completely right. You have completely proven your assertion. Points scored late in the game are added up on the scoreboard differently from points scored early in the game. Silly me.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
When have I not provided evidence to support my assertions?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I love watching mmmm debate
It’s line poetry! Preach on brotha!
Jesus Shuttlesworth: I hate my name. What kind of name is Jesus anyway?
Jake Shuttlesworth: It's biblical.
Jesus Shuttlesworth: Yeah, no kidding.
by jakeshuttlesworth on Feb 10, 2012 1:56 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Like*
Jesus Shuttlesworth: I hate my name. What kind of name is Jesus anyway?
Jake Shuttlesworth: It's biblical.
Jesus Shuttlesworth: Yeah, no kidding.
by jakeshuttlesworth on Feb 10, 2012 1:59 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
For tonights game,
yeah you are right. But you are taking all these factors while not thinking about the putbacks, and1s and so on.
Reboundings been our problem. Check back game 7.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
I have. Many times.
I have examined that game play by play. And you are wrong.
Go back and examine it closely. You will find that the number of points that the Lakers generated on possessions that included ORBs was minimal. In fact their point-per-possession efficiency was much worse on those possessions than otherwise. The reason they had so many ORBs was because they were missing a ton of shots. In the first half, they ‘dominated’ in rebounds, but we lead by 6 at the half. In the second half, they did not, yet they caught us and won.
We lost that Game 7 not because of rebounds, but ultimately because we had only 2 bigs (KG & Sheed) and they ran out of fouls and gas. And because the Lakers shot five gazillion free throws in the 4th.
Rebounds are important. But many people have a distorted impression of what they mean in the game. In a perfect game, you would never miss a shot and thus have zero offensive rebounds. And on defense you would force a TO on every possession and have zero defensive rebounds. Life is not perfect and that would never happen. But that should illustrate that the goal is not to get rebounds. The goal is to score points and to prevent points.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Never.
All the title winners were great. Us in 08 were great too.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
If you are ranking by DRB%, then that's true.
But not true if you rank by rebound totals.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
2010
I’m going to assume you define ‘worse rebounding’ by low number of rebounds, since that is what people usually toss out there to rank teams by rebounding. It is wrong, but convention.
In 2010, the Boston Celtics were 2nd to last in rebounds per game. Yet came within 4 stinking points of winning the title.
The truth is, rebounding totals don’t really tell the tale about whether a team is ‘good’ at rebounding or not. That year, the Celtics were 12th, just a hair above league average in DRB% – which is really the only semi-useful stat to use for assessing how good team’s are at rebounding.
So long as the Celtics are able to grab defensive rebounds at least around league average (typically around 73%), they will be fine – so long as we also SHOOT for high percentage (near 50%) and also hold our opponents to low FG% (near 40%). If we do all three, we win. If not, we lose.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Not sure you guys really disagree
Everyone would (probably) agree that rebounding is important, making shots is important, having a coherent offense is important, etc., etc.
For me, the biggest problem in this particular game was the god-awful offense. Stagnant. Nobody moving, ball sticking, Rondo either hot-dogging or sluggish… man, it was Ugly. Why?… I have no idea. How these games come about is a mystery to me, because we KNOW they’re better than this. Must be something about mindset, about game prep…. or maybe it was just bad peanut butter. Who the hell knows. It’s a mystery.
I agree that the offense was the main problem.
We just had a hard time getting into our set plays. Credit the Lakers for some of that, but we also just seemed a little sluggish. Our off-the ball movement looked hesitant – we were consistently late in setting picks and then late in using the ones that got set.
All that said – the starters overall still outplayed the Lakers when on the court. They collectively posted a significant net positive while on the floor. Our bench, however, all were very negative. We got killed in this game by our bench. LA’s bench was almost all positive. I have to say I didn’t think their bench looked that good on paper, but in this game it rose to the occasion and outplayed us. Smooge did not have one of his better games.
I think we really missed Bradley’s ability to take an opposing offense off their game by shaving 10 seconds off the shot clock each time. I had been looking forward to him being wrapped all around Fisher and Blake as they tried to bring the ball up. That would have allowed Rondo more rest as well.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Yeah espically Gasol
I mean tonight, he was getting baskets and solid on defense. Man did it pain me to say that.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
you know why?
Because 95 percent of the shots they took tonight were jump shots
Have no inside game
KG is now also a jump shooter, Pietrus fires up threes all game.
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 9, 2012 11:58 PM EST up reply actions
Painful loss
But we will rebound
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 10:51 PM EST reply actions
I know, damn me and my optimism.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 11:00 PM EST up reply actions
For 3+ years
and counting…
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 10, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
Bad choice of words
The team will find another way to win games.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 11:00 PM EST up reply actions
Honestly, how many times did they even try to drive the lane tonight?
And it is fitting that it ended on a pierce awkward, fall away shot.
Why didn't KG stop shooting?
At some point he has to say to himself. My shot sucks tonight I’m going to stop throwing it at the rim and pass the ball.
-Sammyg
Catch 22
Doc and many others want him to shoot a lot, but when he does and has a poor shooting night, there’ll be someone asking for less shots. Man, these types of nights happen. He didn’t take bad shots.
Not my question
I’m not asking him to shoot less in all the games. But when he doesn’t have the jumper going. Then why keep shooting? When was the last time a celtic took that many shots and bricked most of them. He has to just say I don’t have it going tonight I’m going to pass this one up.
-Sammyg
I get what you're saying
but you expect every next shot to go in. So many have before, and there’s hardly a reason not to take an open midranger for Kevin. If you pass that up, your offense may fall apart because that’s the main option – Kevin at the elbow
Nah, shots come in streaks and they can pick up at any time.
The best of shooters can slip into an 0-10 slump. And then all of a sudden rip off 4 straight. You have to believe that the next shot will go in, and eventually it will.
If a player is open, with a good look at the rim, especially from their sweet range, I want them taking the shot.
If they don’t fall that sucks. And that is what happened to night. It sucked. But most of the time that’s the winning strategy.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Well I'd agree
if it was Ray Allen having a poor night despite getting good looks, but my problem with KG was his shot selection. I don’t care how many he shoots in fact, I like it when he’s got that offensive mindset going into the game.
True he missed some open looks, but I thought his shot selection overall was a bit poor…. esp the fadeaways with a smaller guy on him and a 3 he took at the end.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Well, I'd certainly rather he was taking shots close in off post moves and rolls to the basket
but overall, I though most of his shots were from good spots, with open looks. He’s normally a well-above average shooter from above the elbow. But tonight they just wouldn’t fall in.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
well that last 3 pointer near the end of the game was a pretty awful shot
lots of time on the shot clock there
How in the world did the Celtics lose to a mediocre team?
Oh yes, we have no Center and a shitty rebounding team… and an idiot like Rondo who stands around with the ball, draining the shot clock, and overall sucking ass.
KG didn’t help the cause with constant missing at the end.
I have to blame this loss on Rondo, seriously. This kid seems to gamble way too damn much and his play always stagnates the offense. I was really hoping for more Moore or at least Bradley to disrupt Fisher.
Rondo?????
Really? Gambling? Fisher hit 0-7 and they had to pull him out, because Rondo kept him out of the game (limited to 24 min.).
by European NBA fan on Feb 9, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions
fisher got a ton of open looks
he just….hes old…he sucks…he was a huge weakness for the lakers on both sides of the court….some of his wide open misses were in like metta world peace territory
Waiting for the Prodigal Son to Return KH12 BITCHES!!!!
In the Chemi-meter we trust!
Seriously
Rondo plays help defense on Kobe and jumps to Fisher when he tries to shoot. Fisher misses every shot. What is wrong with the defense?
by European NBA fan on Feb 9, 2012 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS
REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS REBOUNDS
Rebound wins 18 we r still poor in rebounding and it s*cks!
backs out backs out! why cant they backs out and not allowing teams like L.A. to grab offensive and defensive boards.
by reb0undwins18 on Feb 9, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
Kinda Sucks
But in the end its just a game in a season with many.
But this game should have been a win for the Celtics...
But the flaws are really starting to show up on Rondo’s armor… as well as the gaping hole in the Center position. O’Neal is absolutely dreadful at rebounding and creating offense.
Kobe got bailed out by his teammates
he was terrible in the late 4th quarter and overtime, nearly shot his team out of the game by taking horrible contested jumpers but Gasol or Bynum got a tip-in or offensive rebound at least 3 times. If that was Lebron….
Thoughts on Bynum
I know we want Dwight Howard to go anywhere but to the Lakers, but Orlando can’t resist getting Bynum. I have had doubts about this guy for some time, but let’s be real here. I can’t see a better player that the Magic could get back for Howard right now. Bynum is legit. He proved himself in this game.
As for tonight’s game, I honesty think if we had Avery, we would’ve won. Just saying.
Worst
than Brady’s 7-18 late in the game, LOL!
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 10, 2012 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
Our offense sucks! Our rebounding sucks! We're a joke!
People told me, “we can just win with our defense.” Helloooooooo, nooo, we cannot! Why has nothing changed since 2010? We can’t score the ball! We can’t close out games! Same old story! It’s extremely frustrating to watch the Lakers grab every single off. rebound. What good is to play great defense if you’re going to give up so many second chance opportunities!
How many times tonight did Rondo stand there and pound the ball into the ground
for 15-20 seconds with no one guarding him?
Rondo doesn't get
Teams are backing off him and he just stands there and dribble. One time Ray had steve Blake in the post. Rondo dribbled out 8 sec and shot an air ball instead of giving it up. Ray is not our best post player but any shot by him is better than a Rondo 3.
-Sammyg
Rondo
Rondo was solid for most of the game but his mistakes were crucial. Late in the first half the C’s were playing well to close strong and Rondo stood around talking to the ref and allowed MWP to steal the ball for a breakaway layup. In the 3rd quarter the C’s were up 7 and looking to score again but Rondo made a terrible pass leading to a Kobe uncontested layup. Down the stretch Rondo reverted to his puzzling habit of standing around dribbling until the shot clock wound down and forced bad shots.
As others have pointed out Rondo has some great traits of an elite PG. However he can also be a liability. Tonight he made a couple jump shots but Kobe was just leaving him open to shoot. The Lakers or any other team would love to have Rondo come down and take 20 jump shots because they know in the long run it won’t be successful. Having a PG that can’t shoot free throws and enables opposing teams to leave him uncovered outside of the lane is definitely a liability especially late in games…
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
0 times is the answer
That didn’t happen once in the game.
by European NBA fan on Feb 9, 2012 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
I really watched what happened on the Celtics offense
And what you described just wasn’t the problem. A lot of other problems, yes, including Rondo’s shaky jumpers, but not the dribbling down the clock.
by European NBA fan on Feb 9, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed.
’Didn’t happen.
What also didn’t happen was his teammates doing any real pick & cut to the basket. Arrgh … we played great defense but our offensive execution was just awful.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Agree...
the defense was pretty good tonight.
Most of the big shots Kobe, Gasol and the Lakers made tonight were tough and contested shots with good Celtic defensive pressure.
The offense was the problem tonight though that played a big role in the loss.
Lakers length and the C’s lack of scoring in the paint doomed the C’s tonight...
It was a entertaining game and the C’s had there chances but just could not pull it out.
The Lakers length even with out Odom not around anymore is still tough matchup for the C’s as Bynum and Gasol just caused all sorts of trouble for the C’s all game long on both ends of the court ..even up until the buzzer when Gasol blocked Rays shot with his length.
Also the C’s just over did the perimeter offensive game, as there inside the paint scoring paint was absolutely non exsitant and MIA tonight.
I though Pierce and especially KG had off nights that did not help the C’s cause tonight either.
I also thought the C’s home crowd was a non factor as it sounded as if we were playing in a empty gym for most of the night.
You know the crowd is bad when you only hear 1 BEAT LA chant all night long.
I feel almost as bad as I did after the Pats loss last sunday..aagh.
oh please
don’t even compare this to the SB loss
Agree...
though I felt bad tonight for the C’s loss, I was just joking above that it felt as bad as the Pats loss which still hurts big time and will for a long time I assume.
well, DA can now trade RR for Gasol
and eliminate the LA length advantage
Center??
I’d be happy with a shorter guy that actually attempts to box out.
this is a terrible matchup for us
we’re an awful rebounding team and they have two dominating seven footers
Yea the C's
bigs who are not as long or bulky as the Lakers bigs needed to box out better to help neutralize this Lakers advantage, but they did not and the C’s paid the price tonight.
Yeah, a terrible matchup.
That’s why we got pounded on the scoreboard. Total mismatch.
Wait .. what?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Define 'terrible mismatch' for me.
I don’t usually use that phrase to describe 1 point overtime games.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Terrible mismatch up front for sure
Sad thing is, the Lakers really are not a good team and they still beat the Celtics on their homecourt
Does that mean we had a 'great' mismatch in the back court?
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I don't think it's a terrible matchup for us
I think this Laker team, with or without Phil …. simply has our number
A truly pathetic loss. Somebody had to smack Gasol down just once.
Lygafe
Lionel Gaffen / Fotomix | International Hockey Forums > Europe > ISRAEL
Israel Recreational Hockey Association 2009-2010 & 2010-2011 [ Lygafe ] | Israel Ice Skating Federation - From the Media [ Lionel Gaffen ]
bad basketball
This wasn’t even that fun to watch. Both teams forcing terrible shots in the end. Bad offense all the way around. Lack of boxing out cost us the game.
Already played more than half of their home games this season
16 homes games and 25 road games left — UGH!
People forget the start of the season was the EASY part of the schedule
yeah Fratello pointed that out on the broadcast tonight that is a bad sign especially for a veteran team. The Celtics missed their chance to build up a nice record early in the season with so many home games and days of rest. The schedule is about to get much tougher as the season rolls on.
Fratello made me cringe in the first half when he remarked how Kobe was going to turn it on. He said ‘no way will Kobe let Ray Allen outscore him tonight’ and he turned out to be right…
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
Scared of the paint???
With the game on the line, why can’t our captain, or ray drive into the lane and draw a foul? Out of our last fifteen possessions, I think we put up15 jumpshots? WTF??? NO WAY we should have lost this game to the fakers…..
by greensince72 on Feb 9, 2012 10:55 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I think the C's were...
suffering from “inthepainttis” tonight.
I checked my medical dictionary and apparently its a disease where some fear to go into the paint on offense.
One rebound away..
..from winning in regulation period!
It was a great game, but it hurts. Revenge will be sweet on March 11!
Or, one shot falling
Or, 2 TOS leading to breakaways. Just saying.
"Celtics bring order and structure to a chaotic world"
What will happend to us in the Bulls coming game.
NOW WORRIED…
Boston Celtics
Mayday Mayday!!!
we are going down!
I repeat we are going down…
Bulls will probably win big time.
But hey, what do I know.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
When RR is going to learn how to shoot the ball?
He is very good at many things, but we need him to shoot the ball, is embarrasing that nobody in the league worries about his jump shot.
I was more upset with his poor decisions down the stretch
We’d just stand there, no ball movement, shot clock winding down as Rondo waited for the defense to react. It was really ugly offensive basketball, and that reflects on the PG.
the most worrying stat
is 5 free throws in the game. none in the 4th quarter and overtime
that's why I'm saying it's worrying
not knocking the refs
Celtics NEED----
Celtics need a DOMINANT Center….WHO? Couple of winners in Dwight Howard, Blake Griffin?Expiring contracts…
or steimsa or Wilcox combo
At least at the end when KG and oneal’s legs turn to noodles stuck in cynder blocks
We had 2 good chances to win the game.
It wasn’t meant to be. Painful loss, but entertaining game.
It was anybody's game
But it’s pretty obvious we need more underneath the rim in all phases of the game, more going towards the basket, more free throws, especially against a team with size. The Lakers are not a good matchup for us.
It wasn’t a playoff game it was just a loss but I think this was a first real barometer of the type of things we might need to do.
Pathetic game by the Cs (Lakers too)
Defense was fine. But OMG, the Cs’ rebounding and especially their offense was… incomprehensible. PnRs with nobody rolling. Rondo hero-passing sometimes into 2 or 3 defenders. Hey Rondo — how many times do you have to be told to KEEP IT SIMPLE, man? Doc must’ve said it 100 times by now. Take what the defense gives you and STOP trying for the glory plays. Really, he needs to STOP that crap, once and for all. But… it’s still happening. I am not confident it will ever change.
And the problem is contagious…
- there was KG trying a behind-the-back pass with THREE defenders around him
- and Wilcox doing a Rondoesque overhead hockey pass
- Pierce AND KG both passing into traffic
- and on and on…. all turnovers.
Puhlease, Cs! Damn… I’m sorry, but if this doesn’t change, there’s no way this team wins a championship or even gets close.
Absolutely pathetic offense tonight. Pathetic.
And the Lakers suck. Three good players, nothing else.
Let me tell you something. Lin and the Knicks are gonna beat the Lakers tomorrow. And it won’t be close. All you need is SIMPLE BASKETBALL, run the PnR, hit the open man, get a few rebounds. Something we couldn’t even begin to do tonight.
Dude, I give the Knicks no chance against the Lakers. Their offense and defense will not cut it. Amare can’t rebound his way out of a paper bag against the Lakers.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
Well then
Shows you how much I’ve been paying attention to New York.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
Well, he plays basic basketball
In 3 games, he hasn’t attempted ONE hero play. Just plays it straight-up, a pleasure to watch. Tonight’s game was the exact opposite.
I bet a KNicks win....
the Fakers would be tired of the grindout with the C’s, Plus J.Lin is gonna shread the Fakers.
Very sad indeed.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure where you got that.
I don’t see anybody saying anything other than this being a tough loss.
On the other side, you are nothing but negativity.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Disappointing performance
I think part of it is that they’ve been playing so much better than this. You would think that going against a rival would have motivated them more. I had to turn it off after the 3rd, but from what I saw, their offense and rebounding was passive and lazy. No heart tonight (again from what I saw).
I’ve been really happy with their play (especially the D) lately. Wish they could have shown that against a big rival.
Our 2010 loss in the Finals still hurts so bad! Sometimes I really feel like crying. Sigh.
by P2 on Feb 9, 2012 11:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Rondo was just pathetic tonight
Pathetic and disgusting.
The C's needed Rondo tonight to
run the floor, penetrate and attack the paint to try to give the C’s some points in the paint via transition ( since the big men were MIA scoring in the paint via the 1/2 court game) and to put pressure on the Laker bigs and maybe get them in foul trouble.
Though he tried to do that in the 1st half , he did not do any of that in the 2nd half, which I think hurt the C’s cause.
"Pathetic and disgusting"?
Hyperbole much?
Rondo shot 7 of 13 and dealt out 7 assists (would have been more if the rest of the team shot as well as he did). His opposing PGs (Fisher & Blake) combined to shoot 2 of 14 and dished 2 assists.
Rondo was also +6 on the floor tonight, stole the ball twice and only turned it over 3 times in 44 minutes.
Rondo shot well over 50% – the rest of the team shot well under 40%. If they make just 3 more shots he has a double-double. If they made just ONE more shot, we win.
He wasn’t by any remote stretch of the imagination ‘pathetic or disgusting’ tonight. It may not have been his best game, but come on – the hyperbole is already too thick on this thread.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
While I agree with you 100 percent that Rondo's numbers are okay
And I also agree that he is not the cause for the loss. Don’t you think, however, that the fact that the Lakers can have Kobe guard him and play 10 feet off him all night in the paint gives them an advantage on the defensive end and makes it tougher for the other Celtics to score on the inside? Don’t you also agree that he was passive in the second half?
Playing under the screens a strategy that teams employ all the time on Rondo
and we have about 10 different plays to defeat it. And in fact we did so a few times tonight.
But for whatever reason, the whole team had trouble getting into motion to actually run plays tonight.
Let me also point out that while everyone is beating up on Rondo and to a lesser extent KG, both of those guys – in fact our whole starting unit- were all + tonight. That is, when they were on the floor we were outscoring the Lakers.
We got killed when our bench was on the floor. Our bench was awful and quickly gave up the lead our starters had built. Bass (-6), Pietrus (-4), Wilcox (-3) & Moore (-7) were all negative tonight. Daniels was even (+0), but only played 1:08.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Stat-wise, Rondo was decent/good. But the stats don’t tell the whole picture.
Rondo shooting over 50% comes mostly from the layups he got on fastbreaks. Had he persistently continued doing that, I wouldn’t have any qualms about his play. But in the second half, especially the fourth quarter, he stood at the top of the key not attacking the basket, thereby allowing Kobe-roaming-defense to get to full gear. The other celtics couldn’t get to the rim with Kobe in the middle, so they ended up resorting to jump shots. And by the nature of the jump shots, some went in but most didn’t. So while Rondo shot 50% individually, his inability to hit the jumpshot and keep his defender honest might have factored in the low-percentage shooting from his teammates.
As for fisher & blake not having a good night, I honestly don’t think it’s rondo’s defense. It was mostly them not being good shooters (fisher due to age and blake due to injuries) and missing shots.
Obviously you can’t pinpoint Rondo’s play as the only reason we lost, but I believe it was a big factor in this loss.
by greysoul0614 on Feb 10, 2012 1:14 AM EST up reply actions
It just doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
With Rondo on the floor, we were +6.
We lost the lead our starters built because our bench was completely negative.
People are screaming for Rondo’s head – yet the plain and simple fact is that our bench got completely schooled. Part of that was the fact that Brown left Bynum & Gasol in while we had our bench ‘bigs’ (Bass & Wilcox) in and they simply crushed, even without Kobe on the floor.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Why are we blaming RR...he played ok IMO.
its our pathetic rebounding and coupled that with one of PP’s rare bad shooting night and we only lose by one.
mmmm was right, we could have won with any of PP’s patented pullups or Ray’s open shots from the corner.
Rondo becomes passive late in games
Rondo did play well defensively and seemed to be in the passing lanes all night. In looking at his shooting percentage for tonight and the entire season it can be misleading. He shoots a high percentage because many of his baskets are on layups or shots close in. He is an unreliable outside shooter and everyone knows about his horrid free throw shooting. I think mentally it causes him to struggle late in games. He doesn’t want to take the big shot or drive to the lane in crunch time because he is afraid to take the free throws.
+/- can be a good stat but with Rondo as the entire team it was a complete failure in crunch time which cost them this game. I remember back to game 2 of the season against Miami where Ray Allen tied for the worst +/- on the entire team. But he was the one who almost single handedly kept Boston in that game by hitting several 3 pointers when the offense was struggling so that stat can also be very misleading.
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
+/- may not indicate that an individual played well or not - he may just have been lucky to be on the floor with others playing well
but it DOES measure the true net of what happened while the player (or players) were on the floor. It measures the actual change in the scoreboard (the most important stat of them all).
And the fact is that while the starters (including Rondo) were on the floor, they significantly out-scored the Lakers. They were together on the floor for 20.6 minutes and posted a net +7. Even when not all on the floor together, our starters all posted positive individual numbers.
The problem is our bench had a horrible game and wiped all that out. All of our bench were negative. Mike Brown purposely left Bynum and Gasol on the floor when we had Bass & Wilcox out there and the result was not good. Gasol v Bass in particular was a horror show.
There is nothing misleading about Rondo’s shooting percentages. Those are the shots he takes and the rate at which he makes them. Four of his makes were layups. Three were jump shots. That’s a good distribution.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
When the offense is as bad as it was tonight
It is a safe bet that it’s largely Rondo’s fault, assuming he is playing. That’s the general case. The specific case is that Rondo in the 2nd half was passive, clueless, stagnant, slow, and yeah, pathetic. He completely forgot to drive to the hoop. Couldn’t run a simple pick-n-roll. And btw, he had more turnovers than his line says. At least twice, he threw the ball away but got lucky when it bounced back into green hands.
So….. I will admit to some hyperbole in calling his performance “pathetic and disgusting,” but I have a good excuse. At the time, I had just come from the torture session of having watched that game. A small amount of hyperbole is permissible in those cases. Says so in the rulebook.
Fairly put.
We all get emotional.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
As I feared, their height inside was just too much.
Did we shoot any foul shots in the 2nd half?
I was using this game to convince me that we are playing at the level we need to. I got my answer.
C's hardly attacked the paint..
in transition or in a 1/2 court offense, which meant they took alot of jumpers, dis not put pressure on the Lakers defense, which lessened and basically eliminated the chance of the Lakers fouling the C’s and allowing them the chance to shoot free throws.
Rondo sucks
Every single loss to LA can be blamed on rondo. I know that’s a big generalization to make but it’s true.
Obviously not being able to box out and get the defensive board hurts, but that’s not that different for other teams facing the lakers. The Bynum-Gasol duo are going to get their share of tip-ins.
The problem is that the Cs are soooooooooooooooooooo easy to guard with rondo in the game, especially when an elite defender like Kobe just roams providing help in the paint. Every half-court offense is 5 on 4. That is an extremely hard situation to score in. I begged Doc to take out Rondo and play a 5 of Ray/Truth/Pietrus/KG/JOneal with Pierce playing the point. There’s no way the Lakers defend us to no field goals for 5 mins with that line-up.
Rondo should just take those open jumpshots. A set-up play with 5 guys defending 4 will lead to a much harder shot than Rondo’s jumper.
I’m sick and tired of Rondo killing our offense against the Lakers. Credit to the lakers as one should keep on using a scheme that works. It’s just perplexing that after 5 years and about twenty games against the lakers, the Cs still don’t understand that Rondo is killing us in every single LA game.
Dude,
without Rondo on the floor you have no chance. Your offense is stagnant, there are no cutters, there is no movement, and their is no continuity about who should do what.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
With Rondo on the floor
the offense was stagnant, there were no cutters, there was no movement, and there was no continuity. He killed the offense with his over dribbling and turnovers.
-Sammyg
Ray/Truth/Pietrus/KG/JOneal
that….is actually a pretty good lineup to end that game, mainly because paul pierce is a great ball handler….it wouldve opened up the middle more for J.O.
Waiting for the Prodigal Son to Return KH12 BITCHES!!!!
In the Chemi-meter we trust!
Paul Pierce is not a great ball handler
But would not mind having that lineup in at the end of the game
True Dat
Never has been, don’t care if he scores 5,000 points more than Bird can’t wear his jockstrap, just saying!
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 10, 2012 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly what I said would happen
In the “Hey Rondo, Shut down Derek Fisher” post. It happened in 2010 and it happened again today.
I disagree completely.
Rondo didn’t cause KG to lose his shooting touch and miss 9 straight shots.
Rondo is not the reason his teammates were too timid to execute any pick & cuts to the paint.
I posted some of his numbers for the game above. Rondo is not even remotely close to the reason we lost this game.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I reread my post
and noticed that I was pretty emotional there. the loss just hurt too much.
nevertheless i still think as long as rondo is defended the way he is and he fails to punish the opponents for it, we will always play the lakers holding a huge disadvantage.
by greysoul0614 on Feb 10, 2012 1:18 AM EST up reply actions
"Not even remotely close to the reason we lost"?
A little hyperbole there?
Of course guys missed shots. And guys forgot to roll on the PnR. And the ball stuck in everybody’s hands. But all that STARTS…. with Rondo. He’s the reason there were virtually no drives to the hoop in the 2nd half, just jump shots. He’s the cause of stagnation on offense when it happens while he’s playing. Rondo runs the offense, and when it’s THIS BAD…. it is absolutely correct to blame Rondo.
But blaming Rondo is not the same as blaming ONLY Rondo. There’s plenty of crap to spread around. But certainly Rondo is the one who was doing most of the crap-shoveling on the offensive side tonight.
Disagree...
Rondo was fine if you ask me. WE MISSED SHOTS, don’t blame that on Rondo, we DIDN’T BOX OUT and REBOUND.. that is NOT on Rondo. PP had a rare BAD offensive night, that isn’t Rondo’s fault.
For me its mostly on Doc, he ran his starters to the ground in the same way he did in the Fnals in Game 7, PP, RA, and KG are not in their early 30’s anymore, they are on the other side of it, we needed an infusion of youth, we needed energy and Doc rode the starters including JO’s corpse and so naturally they are gassed and have nothing anymore. Plain and simple.
All these reasons
PLUS the measured fact is that while Rondo was on the floor (44 minutes) we outscored the Lakers by 6 points.
That simple fact allows me to say that what I said without hyperbole.
Most of the crap shoveling was actually by our bench.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Bye Rondo
Won’t miss you when you get traded in March… Lakers don’t even respect you enough to put their hands up to challenge your shots. Dude can’t hit anything outside the restricted paint. If we want defense with no offense, might as well play Bradley and lets get something good for Rondo.
Wow, that was a painful loss...
Pierce shot clanked off the rim but my eyes widen when Allen almost had the put back. Then Pau Gasol blocked it…
Definitely not watching Sportscenter tomorrow to avoid any highlights of this game :P
He also missed Ray
in the corner for a wide open J, at end of regulation. KG had a screen set for Ray Ray.
Ricky Williams retired....Cue up Bob Marley,
"Excuse me while I light my spliff"...
by Great Gatsby on Feb 10, 2012 12:14 AM EST up reply actions
no height, no penetration, a shoulda coulda game, as parcells says- you are what your record says you are- a 7th seed. too many jumpers- the fakers are not that good.
Pietrus
Has he taken a 2 point shot this season? 8 threes in 17 mins??? Someone teach him the pump fake drive move. My son’s 7th grade team just learned this and it’s done wonders for them
-Sammyg
catch and shoot was all that he was used for in Orlando
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
You need him on the floor for another scoring punch and to give Allen some rest.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
I don't need him on the floor shooting three's only ...too predictable...and stupid basketball.
A guy his size and strength should go to the rim once in awhile….I strongly disagree
Is it Soup Yet?
You don't know who Pietrus is then.
Not gonna get that from him. Once every 3 games maybe.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
what difference does it make if I know who he is !!! I know what he should do!!! and it ain't what he is doing now
Is it Soup Yet?
Because you are asking for something he's not going to do
or prone to do. I want Nate Robinson to be a pass-first PG. Not happening.
Pietrus isn’t going to the basket unless there is a 295 at 2am between him and the basket.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
you don't get it....if he isn't going to be anything but a catch and shoot 3 point Antoine
then it’s another bad pick by DA….I would bench him if that’s all he can do..and I wouldn’t have piked him up
Is it Soup Yet?
No, you don't get it.
He’s not gonna drive to the basket. What more is there to get?
You are wishing for something he’s not going to do consistently.
Maybe once every few games. Not as much as you want him to though.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
smh
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
team sucked
Horrible offense. nothing but jumpshots clanging off the rim. too many turnovers. Rondo was either pounding the ball or making foolish, risky passes. Too many other dumb passes by everyone ele too.
Rebounding was even worse. unbelievably bad. This team needs to learn basic boxing out and that the whole team needs to rebound. Noticed that there was a lot less effort by the C’s to hit the offensive boards to.
On the bright side...
If the Lakers defeated the Celtics in Boston…
Does that mean the Celtics will beat the Lakers at Staples again just like every year?
If the luck goes our way yes
Still it is painful to watch your team lose at home the way they did to our biggest rivals.
Ovechkin-Leich-Semin: The greatest line in hockey..............................Tee Hee
Proud supporter of the following clubs: Pittsburgh Penguins, Erie Otters, Columbus Crew, Boston Celtics and the best football clubs in the land: Manchester United F.C.
The Manchester United Football Club: Winning countless trophies and making City fans jealous and full of envy since 1902.
by Bradley James McEachern on Feb 9, 2012 11:13 PM EST up reply actions
We lost the board game 55-45 not that bad for their height advantage. Where we lost the game was at the free throw line we shoot 5 free throws they shoot 20. Yes we lost but we should have won onto the next one to start another streak!
by Blackberry33 on Feb 9, 2012 11:29 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
five vs twenty
This is the difference in the game!!! 5 foul shots for the Celtics. 20 for the Lakers!!! We lose by one!!! Drive the lane, get a foul, pierce and Allen are great free throw shooters, BUT if we don’t get to the line, that IS the difference between a win and a loss!!!
by greensince72 on Feb 9, 2012 11:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions
This loss is on Doc
So much of this game we played offense 3 on 5, as Rondo and JO are virtually worthless in halfcourt. By the last quarter and OT the Big 3 could hardly run up and down the court, they had played so many minutes. Doc always harps on his guys that they have to trust each other, but he won’t trust guys like ET, JJ, and Steimer to play some minutes, guys who you can’t just leave wide open, and can make those shots. ET got some crumbs thrown his way with AB out, but just enough to give RR a couple minute blow.
This team will never win a playoff series, cause Doc will run the Big 3 completely down by the third or fourth game of the first series—-if we get that far.
Marquis is prob out in Doc's book
This is just as a btw…. just more bad news.
It was that play early in Q2 where Barnes was driving to the hoop in an open lane with only Daniels able to block him. Instead of sliding into the lane, Quis barely moved and just pushed him for the foul. Camera showed Doc disgusted, shaking his head, talking to himself. A few seconds later Quis was out of the game, never to return.
I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s all she wrote for Marquis Daniels. I think Doc’s had it.
More energy, that's for sure
And fewer hero plays.
Anybody else think the garden crowd tonight was a non factor?
I thought the C’s could of used them as a 6th man to get them going but they sounded very quiet and laid back and thought at times the C’s were playing in LA for awhile.
There were a lot of Laker fans in the crowd. They were clearly more confident and fired up for this game.
Fans can make you famous, a contract can make you rich, the press can make you a superstar, but only love can make you a player.
- Madonna
nice game tough loss.
were still a poor rebounding team and we rely on perimeter shooting too much. How can we blow out 8 point lead in the 3rd quarter? Garnett is awful his not attacking the rim his always throwing bricks. We dont need to sign this guy nxt year even if he comes out cheap or playing on the bench his done. Our Interior D s*cks we still need some big bodies to throw in to Gasol and Baynum. We cant beat L.A. if we keep playing like that relying on jumpshoots and no offensive rebounds. Pathetic! Phil jackson is right we still know how to loss in the 4th quarter!
Agree fully
with your comment :
“We cant beat L.A. if we keep playing like that relying on jump shoots "
We need to attack the paint and the Lakers bigs via fast break transition offense and some 1/2 court setup offense also.
Agree with a caveat
A large part of us not going to the rim was because there was no space with Kobe in the middle. It’s normally hard to drive to the basket in the NBA even with each defender guarding his matchup. It will be exceptionally hard when you have another guy in the middle clogging up driving lanes.
I don’t want to seem as a Rondo hater, as I know he does bring a lot to our team, but against the Lakers, his not being needed to be guarded leads to stagnant offense/ bunch of jumpshots.
by greysoul0614 on Feb 9, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions
You make a good point...
Rondo is a liability in a 1/2 court offensive setup since he does not have a reliable jumper and the defense slacks of him and doubles up Pierce, Ray and KG, it is for that reason I think he must push the ball and get as many points in transition whenever he to try to hide this deficiency.
But Rondo can not run a transition offense, all night with the aging team he has and the C’s will need to slow it down and go to 1/2 court setup offense at times.
But when they do Id rather Rondo try to space the floor and clear out some of the bigs like (KG, JO, Wilcox and Bass) who have in the paint scoring abilities, to try to get some high % in the paint scoring opportunities and to put pressure on opposing teams bigs to try to get them in foul trouble and out of the game (that can change the completion of a game to the C’s favor) rather then the C’s just coming down and bombing away with lower % jumpers most of the time.
Forget about transition offense
If you can’t grab defensive rebounds, then how the heck are you going to run?
by Celticsdude on Feb 10, 2012 12:01 AM EST up reply actions
Well
I understand your point and doing a better job on the boards both on the offenive and defensive ends of the court tonight may had helped the C’s win tonight.
But all I am saying is though the C’s got out rebounded on the defensive boards 40 to 33, they should of attempted more points in transition after getting and securing each of those 33 defensive rebounds then they did tonight, instead of settling for jumpers.
if bulls sit rose on sunday
and celtics win, will that tell you anything about your team?
Waiting for the Prodigal Son to Return KH12 BITCHES!!!!
In the Chemi-meter we trust!
Don't worry though
it’s all Rondos fault according to 50% of the people in here. Rolls eyes.
"I’m going to probably fade to black,’’ he said. "To be honest, I’m not a showman guy. I’m going to fade to black. I don’t know what I will do. I’m an idealist. I have a high drive and I’m very determined. Fade to black, man, like evaporate.’’
Not all his fault, but he does share a lot of the blame
At this point, I would not be adverse to trading him if they can get something good. I really think he has close to peaked.
Rondo is a unique player
However, he is not a cornerstone around which a team can be built and he really is the only player with trade value on this team.
Not someone to build around, but I think he's a good piece moving forward
I think Rondo is a good addition moving forward after the Big 3 era when the team has more younger players esp. during fast breaks.
But I definitely feel your frustration with Rondo. Tonight on offense it seemed like he was timid and unsure what to do on offense. Plus, he’s shot is still streaky which is why teams dare him to shoot half the time.
Maybe his wrist is still bothering him since he did mention it hurt to flick his wrist when he practices his shot.
Not as bad as Garnett tonight
But yeah he can’t be running the floor by himself all the time.
by yutakhunkhom on Feb 9, 2012 11:52 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed - Not enough Rondo was part of the problem
Remember JJ Barea against them in the playoffs last year? The Celtics had a clear advantage in the back court over Blake or Fisher that they didn’t take enough advantage of in Rondo. He’s faster than anyone on the Lakers and had success driving to basket, which all of the Celtics should have done more.
rondo sucks dude
the reason we lost and will lose is because he cant shoot. I doubt he ever works on his game. Id rather have ancient steve nash any day
I'd do it if we get Gortat back in that trade.
Same passing abilities, and Other than Rose, Nash doesn’t have to guard tough PGs in the East, and if he does, well, that’s why we have Bradley, no?
Quotes....
PP: “If we get one rebound at the end of regulation we would have given ourselves a great chance to win. We got stops but didn’t rebound.”
PP: “I thought we just didn’t get to our sets and played a little too much random pick and roll basketball.”
Doc: “What really killed us is 5 free throws and none in the second half.”
Doc: “I thought our execution was awful the whole game. Give them credit some of it was defense but a lot of it was self-inflicted.”
Doc on Bynum/Gasol: “They’re really long and good. We did a good job on Kobe. Listen, both teams shot 39%, someone had to win.”
Doc on Bynum & Gasol: ""There really long and good"
Exactly why I wanted to see that duo broken up earlier this year when all the trade rumors were flying.
Maybe by the trade deadline it can be done.
LA is not as effective after losing there 3rd twin tower in Odom, but apparently there 2 remaining towers of Gasol and Bynum are still effective, so I hope one of them can be moved down the line at some point.
Mismatch
The biggest one being when Bass was guarding Gasol.
As for the lack of foul shots, the C’s shrink and rarely venture near the paint when they face true big men, so that was no surprise. Offensive execution at key moments was atrocious (can we please try a simple pick and roll or pick and pop with Rondo and KG or Rondo and PP? Just once?)
I’m with mmmmm though—if KG hits his 17 footer with consistency, then we win this game, period. He ran out of gas.
Finally—it would be nice if Wilcox could provide a better dose of toughness off the bench.
by McHaleinthepost on Feb 10, 2012 6:07 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah, Bass really got schooled by Gasol.
That was not pretty.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
The Rondo Blame Game
is unbelievable here. I actually would like Rondo to get traded just to see who’s gonna run the offense after his departure. Dude is always lonely on those fast-breaks. Hope the next PG that you guys are ogling about learns Doc’s system awfully fast, or we’re gonna be moonwalking back to the mediocre years! The Big 3 are pretty much on their last tank, and I do understand that Rondo’s shooting will never help the future C’s, but he needs to stay since he is our most talented player (and YOUNGEST of the starting line-up). Y’all wanna know what killed us tonight? Ummmm, REBOUNDS, only FIVE trips down the FT line, the jump-shooting exhibition hosted by KG and Brandon Bass, leaving Gasol unattended, more poor shooting, and yeah what else??? REBOUNDS!!!!! Rondo kept the corpse of Fisher on check, so thank him for not allowing him to make his clutch 3’s. But hey, Rajon Rondo is responsible for EVERYTHING! Sorry he could never be a D. Rose for you guys, but I’d rather keep a PG that has hustled with one limping, dislocated arm in a playoffs anyday.
by CBanner18Scout on Feb 10, 2012 12:10 AM EST reply actions
not rondo blame game from me
i posted this separately below but am pasting it here as well:
the merits of rondo have been hashed and rehashed and i think most objective celtics fans will realize this; at the end in close games, like those you encounter in the playoffs and finals, rondo is not a difference maker. he cannot penetrate because the middle gets packed and if he does he’ll go 50-50 on fts. his jumper is unreliable. a team with rr as one of its 2 main guys will not win a title period. at this point rr is a chip; his value is reasonably high and probably won’t get any higher—it was higher after 2010 so it’s not at its peak. rr needs to be traded if we want to make the transition from this era to the next. to me an era in celtics speak is a period of time when championships are won. i.e., russell era, cowens/havlicek era, bird era, new big 3 mini-era. i think most everyone else can see that kevin love is dave cowens 2.0. if we could get him we would need pierce to be havlicek and then find a jo-jo and a paul silas—that is what this team can become. i like pietrus, bass, and jj as bench guys. danny get busy! aloha
by bigislandbob on Feb 10, 2012 1:03 AM EST up reply actions
I agree
But you also have to understand our limitations. Rondo to me struggles more with himself since he pretty much doubts his capabilities. He might have reached his prime, he might not have yet. And I do think that Rondo can be 2 of the main guys on a team, but he’d be more as a supporter of the two rather than the leader. The thing that bugs me about some ppl here is that they seem to be enamoured with scoring PG’s that they forget the true nature of a PG, and that is to distribute the ball to scorers. That’s the thing that gets me about PG’s like D. Rose and Westbrook, who rather take shots (yes I know they are great shooters) than to set up a play. To me the best PG is terms of scoring AND passing has to be CP3. But we couldn’t get that guy over here, and his persona is not Celtic-like. My curiousity will only die off Rondo’s abilities after the Big 3 retire, because then it will be all eyes on him, and there we will really see for what he is. Personally I think he’s spoiled himself too much by leaning over Ray and Pierce for the scoring and never really focused on bettering his shooting, since he was all “I’ll pass it to Ray for a three” etc. So in conclusion, Rondo spoiled himself and never took it upon himself to improve his jumpshot and FTs. All in all, it’s more preoccupation of his health and of his shooting that he rarely drives to the lane, he’s a little guy amongst husky brutes the majority of the time! and yes we can all agree that his shooting have possibly reached its peak, but think of what he could do if he had younger guys around him aside from his shooting. I honestly think trading Rajon will hurt the team in the PG department, and without the presence of a CENTER this team will never even reach playoffs! I still have faith in the man, and you know why? Because he’s attempting more jumpshots, he’s been switching roles with PP (ex. the Raptors game where he got injured, despite Toronto being a bad team Rondo took the role of scoring rather than assisting, and fared pretty well). Simply, I just want to see what Rondo will make of himself once our three HOFers hang up their jerseys, that’s all. Then if he does “suck” like everyone labels him up in here…. By all means get RID of HIM!!
by CBanner18Scout on Feb 10, 2012 2:34 AM EST up reply actions
With this loss, the Celtics total of quality wins this year remains at 3
10-7 at home, 4-4 on the road
As always, a lot of us here are overreacting...
It was a tough loss… Off-night for offensive sets, etc. Some of you have got to lay off that trade Rondo idea… He may be awful at shooting but can you seriously not see how the offense flows when he’s manning the point?! So good that even the Captain has said… “Without Rondo = playoff team, With Rondo = contender”.
It was also an ugly game in terms of offense for BOTH teams that’s why it was a close game (and of course, defense on both teams were good). Size mattered. Awful first 2 offensive possessions to start OT. PP made great shots. PP missed the game winner.
It was one of those heartbreaking losses we love to overreact to… but heck, that’s what makes us fans… well.. fans ;)
+1
Good points japsuki especially your point that size matters as the C’s learned the hard way tonight.
Disagree
Those flaws have always been there. They’re the resdon we’ve been kicked out of the playoffs. It’s not changing this year just like that. This game just helped us remember them.
by Celticsdude on Feb 10, 2012 12:18 AM EST up reply actions
Aaaarrrggghhhhh...... I hate losing to the Lakers!
Even if we had a winning streak at 10, that still wouldn’t offset our loss to LA. We ere playing well lately and the Lakers were struggling. This was a winnable game.
The Bucks beat the Lakers w/o Bogut. We are a better team than the Bucks. I hate losing to teams that have been struggling. I feel that struggling teams get that confidence-boosting win against the Celtics. If you’re on a losing streak, play Boston to get that confidence building victory. If you want to get back on track, play the Celtics.
The jump-shooting exhibition courtesy of KG and Bass
And Pietrus needs to STOP taking only 3’s!! Doc needs to start Wilcox man, really does! After the big 3 leave, please SOMEBODY explain to me who’s gonna be the face of the C’s? Because obviously everyone is so caught up in trading Rondo for….. Who again??
1- Westbrook will stay in OKC
2- D-Will’s NBA team wish list doesn’t include the Celtics
3- CP3 publicly stated he don’t wanna play here, as he is all about flashing lights and glamor (see LA, NY)
4- Bulls will NEVER trade away D.Rose!
5-John Wall is a better scorer but Rondo is a better playmaker and passer.
6-Steve Nash is Oh M Gee OLD!
7-Jameer Nelson….. (crickets chirp)
8-Mario Chalmers is playing with two superstars and is not distributing the ball as a PG should do
9-Derek Fisher is Teh’ OLD!!
10-Shumpert….. No comment
11-Ricky Rubio would like to dedicate a song to Boston fans called “Dream On!”, featuring Kyrie Irving as well!!
I know I’m missing more PG’s but I just named the most relevant ones. You guys just don’t see the harm that will get done once Rondo leaves Boston. It’ll hurt more than his trips down the FT line, mark my words. The only thing C’s need is a C-E-N-T-E-R! Gonna go see some Youtube vids of RONDO alley-ooping to Shaq from the 2010-2011 season(becuz yeah, Rondo couldn’t possibly be doing the same with a younger CENTER right??), just to remind myself of the MAIN weakness of this team. Wanna tag along?
by CBanner18Scout on Feb 10, 2012 12:28 AM EST reply actions
Agree that we can't get a better PG than Rondo now or in the near future
I am starting to think however that he has to the 3rd best guy on a team if the team wants to win a ring. He is a pure point guard, and he needs guys to set up. His jumper is better this year than last year, but it’s been upgraded to decent not good. Overall Rondo is the best player on this team due to age the of the big 3, and that makes it very hard to win it all. I will still say the Celtics are long shot contenders for now, they only lost by 1 point and KG/Pierce had horrible shooting nights, also the bench didn’t step up enough.
Not a Panic reaction just a clear example of why Rondo gets traded
the merits of rondo have been hashed and rehashed and i think most objective celtics fans will realize this; at the end in close games, like those you encounter in the playoffs and finals, rondo is not a difference maker. he cannot penetrate because the middle gets packed and if he does he’ll go 50-50 on fts. his jumper is unreliable. a team with rr as one of its 2 main guys will not win a title period. at this point rr is a chip; his value is reasonably high and probably won’t get any higher—it was higher after 2010 so it’s not at its peak. rr needs to be traded if we want to make the transition from this era to the next. to me an era in celtics speak is a period of time when championships are won. i.e., russell era, cowens/havlicek era, bird era, new big 3 mini-era. i think most everyone else can see that kevin love is dave cowens 2.0. if we could get him we would need pierce to be havlicek and then find a jo-jo and a paul silas—that is what this team can become. i like pietrus, bass, and jj as bench guys. danny get busy! aloha
Good post
There will be no rebuilding around rr. He’s a great role player at best. He has no jump shot that puts fear in people. No one rebuilds around players like this.
14-11 is making it very close for da to pull trigger
Celtics offense once again absolutely wilts in crunch time
Hard to believe how much a team with Rondo and 3 Hall of Famers struggles to score late in games. During a stretch of 11 possessions late in regulation and beginning OT the Celtics made only ONE basket.
Boston scored only one basket (Ray’s 3) over the last 3 minutes of regulation. They scored only 2 Paul Pierce baskets in the entire OT. The offense became stagnant and there were possessions where the C’s looked clueless on what play to run.
Scoring 3 baskets total in over 8 minutes of late game action is just not good enough.
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
Anyone remember when Gasol was afraid of KG???
KG really played with energy and it was nice to see him get a couple easy dunks. However he missed numerous wide open jumpers and struggled to keep Bynum and Gasol off the offensive boards. He also was terrible at finishing inside with defenders around as the quick leaping ability to go up strong just isn’t there anymore.
The way KG finished tonight was painful to watch. He had a wide open jumper to ice the game in regulation but missed, also failed to box out on the Laker’s tying basket and instead just watched Gasol tip it in. KG continued to miss open jumpers all night including two key shots in OT. He is just so timid inside at this point in his career. If he isn’t wide open for an uncontested shot he either goes under the basket or weakly throws up a shot that gets blocked or badly misses.
From Doc Rivers 1/6/12 --- "Listen, we’re a 4-4 basketball team. That’s what we are," said Rivers. "You are what your record is; Don’t make no mistake about that. I mean, one of the guys said, ‘Hey, that’s alright, we’re better than that.’ And I said, ‘No we’re not. You’re what your record says you are. And you always have the ability to do something about that.
KG refuses to even attempt to box out
and that’s why teams with a lot of height have their way on the offensive glass against the Celtics. KG’s not boxing out wasn’t as detrimental when playing next to Perkins, because Perk put a body on someone almost every time a shot went up.
When KG plays with Bass, the other team should just throw the ball off the backboard and fetch it, because these two are horrible together rebounding the defensive glass. JO and KG are a big better, but JO is terribly inconsistent about boxing out.
KG cost the Celtics a title by refusing to play fundamentally and box out. He cost them another loss to the Lakers but doing the same thing again tonight.
Lol yea I guess KG has always been a poor rebounder because he "never boxes out" *eyeroll*
KG isn’t always in a position to box out, he moves around a lot when they play d. I’m sure there are times when he should have boxed out (he makes mistakes like anyone else) but there are many reasons the Celtics get outrebounded. The Celtics are old, KG is old, bigs rotate to help and guards don’t come in to rebound. The Celtics are also undersized now, JO is a combo 4/5, bass is a small 4, Wilcox is a 4. KG still got 12 rebounds even with all these things going on, find something else to rant about idiotically.
Yes, another post complaining about Rondo
With Rondo out of the lineup, during games or missing games altogether, I don’t think there is a drop off in play. The offense ran just fine with Pierce controlling things for five games and then Ray coming back and averaging 5 assists for three games. I actually think the defense is much better because while Bradley can be too aggressive on defense and Moore is just average, at least they freaking try to stay in front of their Rondo. This is going on four years that Rondo gives zero effort to block off dribble penetration or fight through screens and stop gambling every time. It’s ridiculous. If Fisher and Blake hadn’t missed so many wide open looks, the Lakers would have blown the Celtics out.
Another thing, the games that Rondo missed were just more exciting to watch. I hate, absolutely hate how often Rondo just dribbles or holds the ball at the top of the key and waits for someone to come off screens. They it every time and it is so stagnant. When Pierce and Allen run things, the ball moves from side to side, screens are set constantly, the ball flows. Sure the offense wasn’t great either but it was better than with Rondo in there. How does that figure? If Rondo is such a great conductor of the offense, why have they rated in the twenties for the last three years since they started putting the ball in Rondo’s hands ALL THE Time.
Pierce didn’t have a great night but he also took only two shots during the second and third quarters combined. He must have touched, just touched the ball maybe eight times during that stretch. It drives me nuts that a point guard, or Doc, can’t keep one of their best offensive players involved. That shouldn’t be too much to ask.
Also, we really need Dooling back
Moore had one good game but is starting to show why he was a 2nd round pick.
Missed games opened my eyes
Another reason why I’m frustrated with Rondo is that the games he missed showed that the Celtics don’t have to run everything through Rondo. The perception before was that Ray and Pierce were too washed up to run things through, that Rondo and his skills were the only things enabling the Celtics to score. Never mind that the Celtics have been a horrible offense with this “great” point guard running things, the games he missed showed that, hey, Pierce or Ray can actually bring the ball up the floor once in a while, or a bunch of times. Rondo doesn’t need call for every single outlet or chase Ray down the court calling for the ball. Remember when the Celtics beat Indiana and Pierce got like three layups in a row going coast to coast? Rondo stifles that. Remember Ray getting 8 assists? Yeah stifles that. Maybe the ball doesn’t have to be in Rondo’s hands for 90 percent of the time when he’s out there. Things won’t fall apart.
I’m gonna keep saying that jump-shots are gonna be our undoing. There were times that KG just looked like an idiot shooting the ball, like bro if you not making them, PASS THE BALL!! Bass uses ZERO of that bulky body of his to drive through defenses in the paint for a dunk, Pietrus is all about 3’s for breakfast, 3’s for lunch, and 3’s for dinner. Oh and you know what he has for dessert? FREAKIN 3’s!!! Pierce was cooled down by World Peace, nobody remembered the flopping spaniard that is Gasoft, who tipped in missed shots and was left mostly alone since it was all about Bynum tonight. Rondo cared more about flashy passing than risky turnovers, landed his jumpshots fairly well tonight, but tainted his performance with his lack of agressiveness at the end of the 4th/OT. Ray Allen was Ray Allen, JO didn’t help with the rebounding (never does), Wilcox shoulda taken his spot long time ago. Our trips to the FT line was poor (just FIVE trips?? REALLY?!!). Dunno wth Marquis was doing out there anymore, TRADE THIS FREAKIN GUY!! We were lucky Kobe didn’t have one of those 40+ points of games he had been having, and Bynum reminded me where we lack in severily. I love my C’s but this team is done! Only way we’re making it to the finals is if by some madness LeBron and Wade get injured, D.Rose sits on bench cuz of his turf toe and Deng does as well. but even then we got those scary Pacers and Sixers to worry about. Here’s my thing: Let KG and Ray Ray retire, PLEASE get rid of Jermaine, Daniels, Dooling, and Pavlovic. That story of Boston not likeable by players is utter bull, cuz how is Indianapolis much cooler than Boston? Look at the Pacers and how good they are. It’s all about money, and plenty of that we’ll have come the end of this season. Let’s see if we can get Jeff Green for a year minimum to see why Danny traded Perkins for this guy! Let’s keep our All-Star PG because other than D-Will we’re not gonna get anyone better than him! Tomorrow we beat the Raptors for the sequel of Gino Time LOL!! sarcasm
Some have argued that the Cs played pretty well, because it was close at the end
Well, let me disabuse you of that notion. The Celtics SUCKED this time. And this a bad, BAD game, all around (though our D was ok). The only reason it was close at the end is that the Lakers SUCK TOO.
Now, I know I will get an argument about this from certain people. So let me just quote Doc Rivers for ya, from his postgame interview:
- “I thought this was an awful game…… If we had won, it woulda been an awful game that we had won.” (My exact thought when the Cs still had a shot to win.)
- “Our execution the whole game was terrible.”
- “Gotta give the defense credit…. but a lot of it was self-inflicted.”
- “Today was no fun to watch.”
- “What really burned me was that they got 6-7 2nd-chance points with the ball ON THE FLOOR.”
- “Two old teams… Jurrasic Park.”
It’s one thing to be sanguine about the team in general, and quite another to pretend they’ve done well when they SUCKED SO BADLY. Reality is an important thing to keep in mind… if for no other reason than they don’t give out championships in Never-Neverland.
I agree with Doc. We did horrible execution on offense.
But you can’t overlook the fact that even as poorly as we played on offense – that it was, indeed, a close game.
In other words, if ONLY we had played even ‘average’ for our expectations on offense we SHOULD have won this game easily.
Doc has a right to be mad. We damn well are a better team than we showed (on offense) last night.
But I like that. That’s the silver lining. Doc knows – and I believe he’s right – that this team still has a lot more upside. He expects better because he believes they are better. I’m thrilled that he’s pissed off.
My main take in this thread though, is that it isn’t very useful to just say ‘they sucked’. If you break down the game, it becomes clear that they did some things good and some things horrible and in this case, the horrible outweighed the good by 1 point. And breaking it down, I think people are generally screaming at the wrong target when they get on Rondo. It wasn’t his best game, but he wasn’t the main problem. The biggest, most glaring let down was how poorly our bench fared.
The starters built up a 9 point lead and when the bench came in, it just evaporated in a blink.
Doc should be pissed.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I hear ya
I’d say the point of disagreement is this: I think the closeness of the game was more due to the fact that the Lakers were very bad too, than the quality of our game. Although, there is no argument at all about the defense — that was good, and that is clearly a solidly good thing.
And I know that Rondo was the prime reason our offense stunk, because he’s supposed to penetrate into the paint, and hardly ever did in the 2nd half and certainly in the 4th quarter. And his anemic line (overall, and especially in the 2nd half) reflects his poor performance.
I’d like to add something else that Doc wanted to say but didn’t quite spell out. He was GLAD on one level that they lost. If they had won, he said, “it would have been a bad game that they won,” meaning a good lesson in what not to do would have been potentially lost.
For that same reason, at the end of that game, I found myself hoping they would lose. When they’re this bad, losing may actually be better for the team long-term than winning.
Having pointed out how bad the Cs were today
I still hold to the notion that BAD GAMES DON’T COUNT… not in the bigger picture of our trying to determine just how good this team can be. In that endeavor — the one where we are trying to determine this team’s ceiling — only great games count. As I’ve said before, stinkers like this Lakers game can’t touch the ceiling, they can only lower the floor. Consider the floor lowered.
But we can still look forward to raising the ceiling. Hopefully, sometime soon. Bad games can do that sometimes.
Rubio shows that lack of PG shooting doesn't mean an offense has to be terrible
When I compare Rondo to Rubio, I can’t help but think that Rondo’s shooting weakness doesn’t mean he has to play the ball-holding style he does. Besides free throw shooting, Rubio is as bad a shooter from outside as Rondo is but it’s a joy to watch him to direct an offense. I would have no qualms about running nearly everything through Rubio because you know what, he keeps the ball moving. He actually passes the ball ahead once in a while from the back court. Imagine that! He thinks it’s a good idea to give his teammates the ball when they have open space in front off them and the defense isn’t set. He passes to pick setters. He drives and kicks with abandon. He makes simple lateral passes to an open teammate who can shoot. Why in the freakity fuk can’t Rondo, a supposed passing savant, play like that?
Another thing, Rubio actually makes an effort to deny dribble penetration and does a very good job of it too. It’s possible but it requires giving a heck which is something Rondo doesn’t.
jump shots..jump shots ... more jump shots
Almost every offensive possession ended with a missed junp shot from 10 ft out. The Celtics has no post-up player, 0 low-post threat. They desperately need some who can rebound, at least at the defensive end
They could secure the rebound at the end of the first half or at the end of regulation, they would have won, Period.
Where are the fire and fluidity in offense that they displayed no long ago against the Magic?
Another tweak
Really to see Ray anchor the second line and have Peach Tree finish down the stretch. Ray can feast on bench players, MP add some D to close out.
"Celtics bring order and structure to a chaotic world"
And this
In terms of scoring, our current starting 5 is like a slower version the Perk-era 5: 3 shooters only. Dont know what DA has up his sleeve but what the club doesnt need is a non-shooting big man, or another D-only PG,
"Celtics bring order and structure to a chaotic world"
Rondo
Love him but until he develops a jumper and or can hit free throws this is the offense we are stuck with and frankly it isn’t enough against the better teams in the league.
If you are going to Eagle, Colorado just get a massage.

































