When I read such words like the anti-Gino sentence about Brooks his 6 minutes on the floor it makes you want to throw up. Everybody knows that the celtic will have a tough year and tanking is in the air. So give me reasons why it is a bad idea to develop Brooks into the main/ goto guy he may could be?
Everything went wrong for him in Brooklyn and he showed in the Preseason that he can be a decent scorer AND passer.
What he needs to develop is defense - OF COURSE - but he can concentrate on it, because on the offensive end he already is a complete player.
NOTHING HAPPENS if you give him one-digit minutes or garbage time. I know it by myself, that the game comes slowly to you, if you don't get playing time for a long period. Pressure grows up and than it took a lot of time to get over the hump but after that everybody praises him and you hear such things like: why not playing this guy earlier... and so on. If you look to our roster this guy is the only one who can make a difference!
So could somebody explain me, why Brooks is the anti-Gino and should get trade as soon as possible, pls`?
Because of Courtney Lee is better? NO - he may do a better job on Brads system by now but athletically he's not on the same level as Brooks. I would rather work on Marshon for the future instead of continuing with Lee.
Bring him in before Rondo is back, otherwise it may be to late!